More than a score: A qualitative study of ancillary benefits of performance measurement

BMJ Quality and Safety

Volumn 23, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 651-658

  Powell, Adam A ^a,b   White, Katie M ^c   Partin, Melissa R ^a,b   Halek, Krysten ^a   Hysong, Sylvia J ^d,e   Zarling, Edwin ^f   Kirsh, Susan R ^g,h   Bloomfield, Hanna E ^a,b  

^a VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^d MICHAEL E DEBAKEY VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE   (United States)

^g LOUIS STOKES CLEVELAND VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MOTIVATION; NURSE PRACTITIONER; NUTRITION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PHYSICIAN; PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SMOKING CESSATION; WEIGHT REDUCTION; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN RELATION; INTERVIEW; NURSE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; NURSES; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIANS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROFESSIONAL-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS;

EID: 84905035953     PISSN: 20445415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002149     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Smith P, Mossialos E, Papanicolas L, et al. Performance measurement for health system improvement: experiences, challenges, prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
2. Roxon N. Second Reading Speech: National health reform amendment (National Health Performance Authority) bill 2011. Canberra: House of Representatives Hansard, 2011.
3. World Health Organization (WHO). The European Health Report 2009: Health and Health Systems. Copenhagen 2009.
4. Doran T, Fullwood C, Gravelle H, et al. Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med 2006;355:375-84. (Pubitemid 44127540)
5. HEDIS & Performance Measurement. National Committee for Quality Assurance website. http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/59/Default.aspx (accessed 28 Jan 2014).
6. Chiu WT, Yang CM, Lin HW, et al. Development and implementation of a nationwide health care quality indicator system in Taiwan. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:21-8.
7. Scott A, Nacarella L, Furler J, et al. Using financial incentives to improve the quality of primary care in Australia. Final Report. Canberra: Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute, Australian National University, 2010.
8. Beata K, Mattias E, Jan L. Design and implementation of a performance measurement system in Swedish Health Care Services: a multiple case study of 6 development teams. Qual Manag in Health Care 2005;14:95-111.
9. Powell AA, White KM, Partin MR, et al. Unintended consequences of implementing a national performance measurement system into local practice. J Gen InternMed 2012;27:405-12.
10. Van Herck P, De Smedt D, Annemans L, et al. Systematic review: Effects, design choices, and context of pay-for-performance in health care. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:247.
11. Fung CH, Lim YW, Mattke S, et al. Systematic review: the evidence that publishing patient care performance data improves quality of care. Ann Intern Med 2008;148:111-23. (Pubitemid 351651554)
12. Ryan AM, Doran T. The effect of improving processes of care on patient outcomes: evidence from the United Kingdom's quality and outcomes framework. Med Care 2012;50:191-9.
13. Kirschner K, Braspenning J, Akkermans RP, et al. Assessment of a pay-for-performance program in primary care designed by target users. Fam Pract 2013;30:161-71.
14. Lester HE, Hannon KL, Campbell SM. Identifying unintended consequences of quality indicators: a qualitative study. BMJ Qual Saf 2011;20:1057-61.
15. McDonald R, White J, Marmor TR. Paying for performance in primary medical care: learning about and learning from "success" and " failure" in England and California. J Health Polit Policy Law 2009;34:747-76.
16. Wilkinson EK, McColl A, Exworthy M, et al. Reactions to the use of evidence-based performance indicators in primary care: a qualitative study. Qual Health Care 2000;9:166-74.
17. Casalino LP. The unintended consequences of measuring quality on the quality of medical care. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1147-50. (Pubitemid 29466231)
18. Asch SM, McGlynn EA, Hogan MM, et al. Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample. Ann Intern Med 2004;141:938-45.
19. Gene-Badia J, Escaramis-Babiano G, Sans-Corrales M, et al. Impact of economic incentives on quality of professional life and on end-user satisfaction in primary care. Health Policy 2007;80:2-10. (Pubitemid 44750276)
20. Rodriguez HP, von GT, Rogers WH, et al. Organizational and market influences on physician performance on patient experience measures. Health Serv Res 2009;44:880-901.
21. Kizer KW, Demakis JG, Feussner JR. Reinventing VA health care: systematizing quality improvement and quality innovation. Med Care 2000;38:I7-I16.
22. Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2002.
23. Proenca EJ, Rosko MD, Zinn JS. Correlates of hospital provision of prevention and health promotion services. Med Care Res Rev 2003;60:58-78. (Pubitemid 36206264)
24. Halm EA, Lee C, Chassin MR. Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Ann Intern Med 2002;137:511-20. (Pubitemid 35024623)
25. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006;18:59-82.
26. Miles MB, Huberman AM. An expanded sourcebook: qualitative data analysis. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
27. Saldana J. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2009.
28. Hogg MA. Social identifications: a social psychology of intergroup relations group processes. London: Poutledge, 1988.
29. Bodenheimer T. Primary care - will it survive? N Engl J Med 2006;355:861-4. (Pubitemid 44315976)
30. Colwill JM, Cultice JM, Kruse RL. Will generalist physician supply meet demands of an increasing and aging population? Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:w232-41. (Pubitemid 351770283)
31. Salsberg E, Rockey PH, Rivers KL, et al. US residency training before and after the 1997 Balanced Budget Act. JAMA 2008;300:1174-80.
32. Bitton A, Martin C, Landon BE. A nationwide survey of patient centered medical home demonstration projects. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25:584-92.
33. Solberg LI. How can we remodel practices into medical homes without a blueprint or a bank account? J Ambul Care Manage 2011;34:3-9.
34. Wolfson D, Bernabeo E, Leas B, et al. Quality improvement in small office settings: an examination of successful practices. BMC Fam Pract 2009;10:14.
35. Hysong SJ. Meta-analysis: audit and feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality. Med Care 2009;47:356-63.
36. Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psych Bul 1996;119:254-84. (Pubitemid 126042646)
37. Bruera E, Sweeney C, Calder K, et al. Patient preferences versus physician perceptions of treatment decisions in cancer care. J Clin Oncol 2001;19:2883-5. (Pubitemid 32538198)
38. Elkin EB, Kim SH, Casper ES, et al. Desire for information and involvement in treatment decisions: elderly cancer patients' preferences and their physicians' perceptions. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:5275-80. (Pubitemid 350232261)
39. Hall JA, Stein TS, Roter DL, et al. Inaccuracies in physicians' perceptions of their patients. Med Care 1999;37:1164-8.