Characterizing participants in the clinSeq genome sequencing cohort as early adopters of a new health technology

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 7, 2015, Pages

  Lewis, Katie L ^a   Han, Paul K J ^b   Hooker, Gillian W ^c   Klein, William M P ^d   Biesecker, Leslie G ^a   Biesecker, Barbara B ^a,c  

^a NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b Maine Medical Center Research Institute   (United States)

^c Social and Behavioral Research Branch ^*  (United States)

^d NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AFFECT; AGED; AGREEABLENESS; ARTICLE; CAUCASIAN; COGNITION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSCIENTIOUSNESS; COPING BEHAVIOR; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EXTRAVERSION; FEMALE; GENE SEQUENCE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INCOME; MALE; MARRIAGE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROSIS; NORMAL HUMAN; OPENNESS; OPTIMISM; PERSONALITY; PHENOTYPE; PROGENY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL STATUS; DEMOGRAPHY; DNA SEQUENCE; GENOMICS; HUMAN GENOME; PROCEDURES;

AGED; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; COHORT STUDIES; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOMICS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84940885887     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132690     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Biesecker LG, Green RC. Diagnostic clinical genome and exome sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370:2418-25. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1312543 PMID: 24941179.
2. Biesecker LG, Mullikin JC, Facio FM, Turner C, Cherukuri PF, Blakesley RB, et al. The ClinSeq Project: Piloting large-scale genome sequencing for research in genomic medicine. Genome Res. 2009; 19(9): 1665-74. doi:10.1101/gr.092841.109 PMID: 19602640.
3. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. Anticipate and communicate: Ethical management of incidental and secondary findings in the clinical, research and direct-to-consumer contexts [Internet]. [updated 2013; cited 2014 Sep 10]. Available from: http://bioethics.gov/node/3183.
4. Biesecker LG. Hypothesis-generating research and predictive medicine. Genome Res. 2013; 23(7): 1051-3. doi:10.1101/gr.157826.113 PMID: 23817045.
5. Facio FM, Brooks S, Lowenstein J, Green S, Biesecker LG, Biesecker BB. Motivators for participation in a whole-genome sequencing study: implications for translational genomics research. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011; 19(12):1213-7. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2011.123 PMID: 21731059.
6. Carere D, Couper MP, Crawford SD, Kalia SS, Duggan JR, Moreno TA, et al. Design, methods and participant characteristics of the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study, a prospective cohort study of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing customers. Genome Med. 2014; 6:96-106. doi:10.1186/s13073-014-0096-0PMID: 25484922.
7. Gollust SE, Gordon ES, Zayac C, Griffin G, Christman MF, Pyeritz RE, et al. Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: Perspectives from research participants. Public Health Genomics. 2012; 15:22-30. PMID: 21654153.
8. Bloss CS, Ornowski L, Silver E, Cargill M, Vanier V, Schork NJ, et al. Consumer perceptions of directto- consumer personalized genomic risk assessments. Genet Med. 2010; 12:556-66. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181eb51c6 PMID: 20717041.
9. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. Glencoe: Free Press; 1962.
10. Furnham A, Marks J. Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the recent literature. Psychology. 2013; 4(9): 717-28.
11. Marcati A, Guido G, Peluso AM. The role of SME entrepreneurs' innovativeness and personality in the adoption of innovations. Res Policy. 2008; 37(9):1579-90.
12. Gelade G. Creative style, personality and artistic endeavor. Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 2002; 128(3):213-234. PMID: 12401033.
13. Zhao H, Seibert SE. The big five personality dimensions and entrepreneurial status: A meta-analytic review. J Appl Psychol. 2006; 91(2):259-71. PMID: 16551182.
14. Georgsdottir AS, Getz I. How flexibility facilitates innovation and ways to manage it in organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management. 2004; 13(3):166-75.
15. Scheier ME, Carver CS. Dispositional optimism and physical well-being: The influence of generalized outcome expectancies on health. J Pers. 1987; 55:169-210. PMID: 3497256.
16. Achat H, Kawachi I, Spiro A, DeMolles DA, Sparrow D. Optimism and depression as predictors of physical and mental health functioning: The normative aging study. Ann Behav Med. 2000; 22(2):127-30. PMID: 10962705.
17. Gellar G, Tambor ES, Chase GA, Holtzman NA. Measuring physicians' tolerance for ambiguity and its relationship to their reported practices regarding genetic testing. Med Care. 1993; 31(11):989-1001. PMID: 8231339.
18. Han PK, Klein WM, Arora NK. Varieties of uncertainty in health care: A conceptual taxonomy. Med Decis Making. 2011; 31:828-38 PMID: 22067431.
19. Ellsberg D. Risk, ambiguity and the savage axioms. Q J Econ. 1961; 75(4):643-69.
20. Scheier ME, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, selfmastery and self-esteem): A re-evaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994; 67:1063-78. PMID: 7815302.
21. John OP & Srivastava S. The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin LA & Johns OP, editors. Handbook of personality: Theory and research. New York: Guilford Press; 1999. pp. 102-138.
22. Wagnild, GM. The Resilience Scale [Internet]. [updated 2014; cited 20 Aug 2014]. Available from: http://www.resiliencescale.com/en/rstest/rstest-14-en.html.
23. Armstrong K, Micco E, Carney A, Stopfer J, Putt M. Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer. JAMA. 2005; 293(14):1729-36. PMID: 15827311.
24. McBride CM, Koehly LM, Sanderson SC, Kaphingst KA. The behavioral response to personalized genetic information: Will genetic risk profiles motivate individuals and families to choose more healthful behaviors? Annu Rev Public Health. 2010; 31:89-103. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.012809. 103532 PMID: 20070198.
25. Aspinwall LG, Leaf SL, Dola ER, Kohlmann W, Leachman SA. CDKN2A/p16 genetic test reporting improves early detection intentions and practices in high-risk melanoma families. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008; 17(6):1510-9. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-0010 PMID: 18559569.
26. Taber JM, Klein WM, Ferrer RA, Lewis KL, Biesecker LG, Biesecker BB. Dispositional optimism and perceived risk interact to predict intentions to learn genome sequencing results. Health Psychol. In Press.
27. Facio FM, Eidem H, Fisher T, Brooks S, Linn A, Kaphingst KA, et al. Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013; 21(30):261-5.
28. Kaphingst KA, Facio FM, Cheng M-R, Brooks S, Eidem H, Linn A, et al. Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge. Clin Genet. 2012; 82(5):408-15. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2012.01909.x PMID: 22694298.
29. Klein WM, Shepperd JA, Suls J, Rothman AJ, Croyle RT. Realizing the promise of social psychology in improving public health. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2015; 19(1):77-92. doi:10.1177/1088868314539852 PMID: 24981514.
30. Taber JM, Klein WM, Ferrer RA, Lewis KL, Harris PR, Shepperd JA, Biesecker LG. Information Avoidance Tendencies, Threat Management Resources, and Interest in Genetic Sequencing Feedback. Ann Behav Med. In Press.
31. Ferrer RA, Taber JM, Klein WM, Harris PR, Lewis KL, Biesecker LG. The role of current affect, anticipated affect and spontaneous self-affirmation in decisions to receive self-threatening genetic risk information. Cogn Emot. In Press.
32. McGowan ML, Fishman JR, Lambrix MA. Personal genomics and individual identities: Motivations and moral imperatives of early users. New Genet Soc. 2010; 29(3):261-90. PMID: 21076647.
33. Michie S, Bobrow M, Marteau TM. Predictive genetic testing in children and adults: A study of emotional impact. J Med Genet. 2001; 38(8):519-26. PMID: 11483640.
34. Heshka JT, Palleschi C, Howley H, Wilson B, Wells PS. A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing. Genet Med. 2008; 10(1):19-32. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f524f PMID: 18197053.
35. Fredrickson BL. The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. Am Psychol. 2001; 56(3):218-26. PMID: 11315248.
36. Srivastava S, John OP, Gosling SD, Potter J. Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: Set like plaster or persistent change? J Pers Soc Pscyhol. 2008; 84(5):1041-53.
37. Costa PT, McCrae RR, PAR Staff. NEO Personality Inventory-3 Interpretive Report [Internet]. [updated 2010; cited 5 Sep 2014]. Available from: http://www.acer.edu.au/acer/search-results?q=NEO+personality+inventory&submit=.
38. Hopwood CJ, Morey LC, Skodol AE, Strout RL, Yen S, Ansell EB, et al. Five-factor model of personality traits associated with alcohol-related diagnoses in a clinical sample. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2007; 68:455-60. PMID: 17446986.
39. Munafò MR, Zetteler JI, Clark TG. Personality and smoking status: A meta-analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. 2007; 9:405-13. PMID: 17365772.
40. Chapman BP, Fiscella K, Kawachi I, Duberstein PR. Personality, socioeconomic status and all-cause mortality in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 171(1):83-92. doi:10.1093/aje/kwp323 PMID: 19965888.
41. Bloss CS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ. Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk. N Engl J Med. 2011; 364:524-534. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1011893 PMID: 21226570.
42. Feero WG, Wicklund C, Veenstra DL. The economics of genomic medicine: insights from the IOM roundtable on translating genomic-based research for health. JAMA. 2013; 309(12):1235-1236. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.113 PMID: 23532238.
43. Facio FM, Lee K, O'Daniel JM. A genetic counselor's guide to using next-generation sequencing in clinical practice. J Genet Counsel. 2013; 23:455-462.
44. Gray SB, Martins Y, Feuerman LZ, Bernhardt BA, Biesecker BB, Christensen KD, et al. Social and behavioral research in genomic sequencing: Approaches fromthe Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium Outcomes and Measures Working Group. Genet Med. 2014; 16(10):727-35. doi:10.1038/gim.2014.26 PMID: 24625446.
45. Bollinger JM, Scott J, Dvoskin R, Kaufman D. Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: findings from a qualitative focus group study. Genet Med. 2012; 14:451-7. doi:10.1038/gim.2011.66 PMID: 22402755.
46. Wright MF, Lewis KL, Fisher TC, Hooker GW, Emanuel TE, Biesecker LG, et al. Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing. Genet Med. 2013; 16:442-7. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.170 PMID: 24310310.