메뉴 건너뛰기
mBio
Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2015, Pages
The justification for the academy track in mbio
Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]
Indexed keywords

AMERICAN; AMERICAN ACADEMY OF MICROBIOLOGY; AMERICAN ACADEMY OF MICROBIOLOGY TRACK; DECISION MAKING; EDITORIAL; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; MICROBIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; ORGANIZATION; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH; UNITED STATES; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; PUBLISHING;
EID: 84940882378     PISSN: 21612129     EISSN: 21507511     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/mBio.01222-15     Document Type: Editorial
Times cited : (6)
References (13)
  • 1
    • 84902960290 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Scientific publishing: The inside track
    • Aldhous P. 2014. Scientific publishing: the inside track. Nature 510: 330–332. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/510330a
    • (2014) Nature , vol.510 , pp. 330-332
    • Aldhous, P.1
  • 3
    • 0028291595 scopus 로고
    • Is there gender bias in JAMA’s peer review process?
    • Gilbert JR, Williams ES, Lundberg GD. 1994. Is there gender bias in JAMA’s peer review process? JAMA 272:139–142
    • (1994) JAMA , vol.272 , pp. 139-142
    • Gilbert, J.R.1    Williams, E.S.2    Lundberg, G.D.3
  • 4
    • 0028234337 scopus 로고
    • Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language
    • Nylenna M, Riis P, Karlsson Y. 1994. Multiple blinded reviews of the same two manuscripts. Effects of referee characteristics and publication language. JAMA 272:149–151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.272.2.149
    • (1994) JAMA , vol.272 , pp. 149-151
    • Nylenna, M.1    Riis, P.2    Karlsson, Y.3
  • 5
    • 33646104670 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals
    • Smith R. 2006. Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals. J R Soc Med 99:178–182. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.99.4.178
    • (2006) J R Soc Med , vol.99 , pp. 178-182
    • Smith, R.1
  • 6
    • 0037024214 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effects of editorial peer review: A systematic review
    • Jefferson T, Alderson P, Wager E, Davidoff F. 2002. Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic review. JAMA 287:2784–2786. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2784
    • (2002) JAMA , vol.287 , pp. 2784-2786
    • Jefferson, T.1    Alderson, P.2    Wager, E.3    Davidoff, F.4
  • 7
    • 0033996860 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A randomized controlled study of reviewer bias against an unconventional therapy
    • Resch KI, Ernst E, Garrow J. 2000. A randomized controlled study of reviewer bias against an unconventional therapy. JRSocMed93:164–167
    • (2000) Jrsocmed93 , pp. 164-167
    • Resch, K.I.1    Ernst, E.2    Garrow, J.3
  • 8
    • 84940887547 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • ISCID Archive, 30 June 2003, International Society for Complexity, Information, and Design. (Society and website inactive after September 2008.)
    • Tipler FJ. 2003. Refereed journals: do they insure quality or enforce orthodoxy. ISCID Archive, 30 June 2003, International Society for Complexity, Information, and Design. (Society and website inactive after September 2008.)
    • (2003) Refereed Journals: Do they Insure Quality Or Enforce Orthodoxy
    • Tipler, F.J.1
  • 9
    • 84918802079 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Publishing: The peer-review scam
    • Ferguson C, Marcus A, Oransky I. 2014. Publishing: the peer-review scam. Nature 515:480–482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/515480a
    • (2014) Nature , vol.515 , pp. 480-482
    • Ferguson, C.1    Marcus, A.2    Oransky, I.3
  • 11
    • 0033514074 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opening up BMJ peer review
    • Smith R. 1999. Opening up BMJ peer review. BMJ 318:4–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7175.4
    • (1999) BMJ , vol.318 , pp. 4-5
    • Smith, R.1
  • 12
    • 84900868133 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opening up peer review in life: Towards a transparent and reliable process
    • Rampelotto PH. 2014. Opening up peer review in life: towards a transparent and reliable process. Life (Basel) 4:225–226. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life4020225
    • (2014) Life (Basel) , vol.4 , pp. 225-226
    • Rampelotto, P.H.1
  • 13
    • 84939143239 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Credibility, peer review, and Nature, 1945–1990
    • 1 July 2015
    • Baldwin M. 1 July 2015. Credibility, peer review, and Nature, 1945–1990. Notes Rec http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2015.0029.
    • Notes Rec
    • Baldwin, M.1

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.