Multi-scale participatory scenario methods and territorial planning in the Brazilian Amazon

Futures

Volumn 73, Issue , 2015, Pages 86-99

  Folhes, Ricardo Theophilo ^a,b   Aguiar, Ana Paula Dutra de ^c   Stoll, Emilie ^a,d   Dalla Nora, Eloi Lennon ^c   Araújo, Roberto ^a,c   Coelho, Andrea ^e   Canto, Otávio do ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARÁ   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITÉ SORBONNE NOUVELLE PARIS 3   (France)

^c INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE PESQUISAS ESPACIAIS   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^e Instituto de Desenvolvimento Econômico   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Brazilian amazon; Deforestation; Land use and cover change; Participatory methods; Scenarios; Territorial planning

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DEFORESTATION; LAND COVER; LAND USE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; LOCAL PLANNING; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; TERRITORIAL PLANNING;

AMAZONAS [BRAZIL]; BRAZIL; PARA [BRAZIL];

EID: 84940862094     PISSN: 00163287     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.futures.2015.08.005     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Acuña C.D. Novo descubrimento do grande rio das Amazonas 1994, Agir, Rio de Janeiro.
2. Alcamo J. Environmental Futures: The Practice of Environmental Scenario Analysis 2008, Elsevier, Amsterdam.
3. Araújo, R., 2009. De la Communauté aux populations traditionnelles, Nuevo Mundo Mundos Nuevos. Nouveaux mondes Mondes nouveaux, Novo Mundo Mundos Novos, New World New Worlds. Available: . http://doi.org/10.4000/nuevomundo.56593.
4. Alcamo J., Ribeiro T. Scenarios as tools for international environmental assessments. Environmental issue report No. 24 2001, European Environment Agency, Germany, http://www.google.fr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCcQFjAAahUKEwjt4Oqv39rGAhUBVhQKHc55AAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eea.europa.eu%2Fpublications%2Fenvironmental_issue_report_2001_24%2Fdownload&ei=9BClVe2WLoGsUc7zAQ&usg=AFQjCNHghDY0BWJ7hHTQBk9W2WNqTPqJOA&bvm=bv.97653015,d.d24, p. 31.
5. An L. Modeling human decisions in coupled human and natural systems: review of agent-based models. Ecological Modelling 2012, 229(24):25-36. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2011.07.010.
6. Araújo R., Léna P. Da predação à sustentabilidade na Amazônia: a difícil metamorfose. Desenvolvimento Sustentável e Sociedades na Amazônia 2010, MPEG, Belém, pp. 13-55.
7. Auvinen H., Ruutu S., Tuominen A., Ahlqvist T., Oksanen J. Process supporting strategic decision-making in systemic transitions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2015, 94:97-114. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.07.011.
8. Börjeson L., Höjer M., Dreborg K.-H., Ekvall T., Finnveden G. Scenario types and techniques: towards a user's guide. Futures 2006, 38(7):723-739. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.12.002.
9. Becker, B. (1997). Amazônia. São Paulo: Ática.
10. Becker B.K. Amazônia: geopolítica na virada do III milênio 2009, Editora Garamond, Rio de Janeiro.
11. Becu N., Neef A., Schreinemachers P., Sangkapitux C. Participatory computer simulation to support collective decision-making: potential and limits of stakeholder involvement. Land Use Policy 2008, 25(4):498-509. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2007.11.002.
12. Bettendorff J.F. Crônica da missão dos padres na Companhia de Jesus no Estado do Maranhão 2010, Edições do Senado Federal, Brasília.
13. Biggs R., Raudsepp-Hearne C., Atkinson-Palombo C., Bohensky E., Boyd E., Cundill G., et al. Linking futures across scales: a dialog on multiscale scenarios. Ecology and Society 2007, 12(1). art. 17.
14. Borras S., Hall R., Scoones I., White B., Wolford W. Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies 2011, 38(2):209-216. http://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.559005.
15. Bradfield R., Wright G., Burt G., Cairns G., Van Der Heijden K. The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning. Futures 2005, 37(8):795-812. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003.
16. Buarque S.C. Metodologia e técnicas de construção de cenários globais e regionais. Texto para discussão no. 939 2003, IPEA, Brasília, http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/images/stories/PDFs/TDs/td_0939.pdf, p. 75.
17. Bunker S.G. Underdeveloping the Amazon 1985, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/U/bo3634235.html.
18. Cosgrove W.J., Rijsberman F.R., Council W.W. World water vision: making water everybody's business 2000, Earthscan Publications, London.
19. Dalla-Nora E.L., de Aguiar A.P.D., Lapola D.M., Woltjer G. Why have land use change models for the Amazon failed to capture the amount of deforestation over the last decade?. Land Use Policy: The International Journal Covering All Aspects of Land Use 2014, 39:403-411.
20. Dufva M., Ahlqvist T. Knowledge creation dynamics in foresight: A knowledge typology and exploratory method to analyse foresight workshops. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2015, 94:251-268. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.007.
21. Ferreira J., Aragão L.E.O.C., Barlow J., Barreto P., Berenguer E., Bustamante T.A., et al. Environment and Development. Brazilãs environmental leadership at risk. Science 2014, 346(6210):706-707. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260194.
22. Folhes R.T. Uma cartografia da memória (cartografia participativa) 2007, Projeto Saude e Alegria, Santarém.
23. Folhes R.T. Cenários de mudanças de uso da terra na Amazônia: explorando uma abordagem participativa e multi-escala no PAE Lago Grande, em Santarém-Pará. Dissertação de Mestrado 2010, UFPA-PPGCA, Belém.
24. Giddens A. The Politics of Climate Change 2009, Polity Press, Cambridge UK.
25. Godet M. The art of scenarios and strategic planning: tools and pitfalls. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2000, 65(1):3-22. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(99).
26. Gomes D.M.C. The diversity of social forms in pre-colonial Amazonia. Revista de Arqueologia Americana 2007, 25:189-225.
27. Kok K. The potential of fuzzy cognitive maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil. Global Environmental Change 2009, 19(1):122-133. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.08.003.
28. Kok K., Biggs R., Zurek M. Methods for developing multiscale participatory scenarios: insights from Southern Africa and Europe. Ecology and Society 2007, 13(1). art. 8.
29. Kok K., Patel M., Rothman D.S., Quaranta G. Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part II. Participatory local scenario development. Futures 2006, 38(3):285-311. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.07.006.
30. Kok K., Rothman D.S., Patel M. Multi-scale narratives from an IA perspective: Part I. European and Mediterranean scenario development. Futures 2006, 38(3):261-284. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.07.001.
31. Lapola D.M., Schaldach R., Alcamo J., Bondeau A., Koch J., Koelking C., Priess J.A. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107(8):3388-3393. http://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907318107.
32. Laurance W.F., Cochrane M.A., Bergen S., Fearnside P.M., Delamônica P., Barber C., et al. The future of the Brazilian Amazon. Science 2001, 291(5503):438-439. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.291.5503.438.
33. J.-P Leroy Uma chama na Amazônia 1991, Vozes/FASE Editora, Rio de Janeiro.
34. Martinelli L.A., Naylor R., Vitousek P.M., Moutinho P. Agriculture in Brazil: impacts, costs, and opportunities for a sustainable future. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2010, 2(5-6):431-438. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.09.008.
35. Miller R. Futures literacy: A hybrid strategic scenario method. Futures 2007, 39(4):341-362. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2006.12.001.
36. Muniz J.de P. Índice dos títulos de terras expedidos pelo governo do estado na Administração do Exm. Snr. Dr. Augusto Montenegro: 1901-1908 1909, Secretária de Estado de Obras Públicas, Terras e Viação, Belém.
37. Muniz J.de P., de J.P. Índice geral dos registros de terras: descritivo das freguesias 1909, vol. T.6. Secretaria de Estado de Obras Publica Terras e Viação, Belém.
38. Parson E.A. Useful global-change scenarios: current issues and challenges. Environmental Research Letters 2008, 3(4):45016. http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045016.
39. Patel M., Kok K., Rothman D.S. Participatory scenario construction in land use analysis: an insight into the experiences created by stakeholder involvement in the Northern Mediterranean. Land Use Policy 2007, 24(3):546-561. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2006.02.005.
40. Quist J., Vergragt P.J. Backcasting for industrial transformations and system innovations towards sustainability: relevance for governance? Governance for industrial transformation. Proceedings of the 2003 Berlin conference on the human dimensions of global environmental change 2004, 409-437.
41. Raskin P., Monks F., Ribeiro T., Van Vuuren D., Zurek M. Global scenarios in historical perspective. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Scenarios. Findings of the Scenarios Working Group 2005, Island Press, Washington, http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.326 aspx.pdf, pp. 35-44.
42. Schmink M., Wood C.H. Contested frontiers in Amazonia 1992, Columbia University Press, New York.
43. Soares-Filho B.S., Nepstad D.C., Curran L.M., Cerqueira G.C., Garcia R.A., Ramos C.A., et al. Modelling conservation in the Amazon basin. Nature 2006, 440(7083):520-523. http://doi.org/10.1038/nature04389.
44. Stoll E. Rivalités riveraines: territoires, stratégies familiales et sorcellerie en Amazonie brésilienne. Thèse de doctorat 2014, EPHE, Paris.
45. Stoll E., Folhes R.T. Frères ennemis: la participation à l'épreuve des factions en Amazonie brésilienne. Cahiers Des Amériques Latines 2013, 72-73:141-160.
46. Stoll E., Folhes R.T. La (dés) illusion communautaire: de l'ambivalence de la notion de communauté en Amazonie brésilienne. Journal de La Société Des Américanistes 2014, 100(2):73-113.
47. Swart R.J., Raskin P., Robinson J. The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Global Environmental Change 2004, 14(2):137-146. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.002.
48. Vergragt P.J., Quist J. Backcasting for sustainability: introduction to the special issue. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2011, 78(5):747-755. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.010.
49. Voinov A., Bousquet F. Modelling with stakeholders. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25(11):1268-1281. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.03.007.
50. Wilkinson A., Eidinow E. Evolving practices in environmental scenarios: a new scenario typology. Environmental Research Letters 2008, 3(4) 1):7. http://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/4/045017.
51. Wollemberg E., Edmunds D., Buck L. Anticipating change: scenarios as a tool for adaptive forest management 2000, Center for International Forestry Research, Indonesia. http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/SCENARIO.pdf.
52. de Aguiar A.P.D., Assis T.O., Folhes R.T., Dalla-Nora E.L., Araújo R., Alves D. Modelagem e cenários para a Amazônia Ambiente e Sociedade na Amazônia. Uma abordagem interdisciplinar 2014, 100-134. MPEG, Belém.
53. van Asselt Marjolein B.A., Rijkens-Klomp N. A look in the mirror: reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environmental Change 2002, 12(3):167-184. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(02)12-2.
54. van Notten P.W.F., Rotmans J., van Asselt M.B.A., Rothman D.S. An updated scenario typology. Futures 2003, 35(5):423-443. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(02)90-3.
55. van Vliet M., Kok K., Veldkamp T. Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies: the use of fuzzy cognitive maps as a communication and learning tool. Futures 2010, 42(1):1-14. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2009.08.005.