Formulation development and optimization of nateglinide-loaded ethyl cellulose nanoparticles by box-behnken design

International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences

Volumn 7, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 310-315

  Gopi, G ^a   Kannan, K ^a  

^a ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Box Behnken; Drug delivery; Nanoparticles; Nateglinide; Response surface methodology; Solvent evaporation method

Indexed keywords

ETHYL CELLULOSE; NANOPARTICLE; NATEGLINIDE;

ARTICLE; BOX BEHNKEN DESIGN; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG FORMULATION; DRUG LOADING; DRUG RELEASE; ENTRAPMENT EFFICIENCY; PARTICLE SIZE; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PHYSICAL PHENOMENA; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; REVERSED PHASE HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STIRRING SPEED; SURFACTANT CONCENTRATION; TIME; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 84940655462     PISSN: None     EISSN: 09751491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Vyas SP, Khar RK. Targeted and controlled drug delivery: Novel carrier system. 1sted. CBS Publishers and distributors; 2007. p. 363.
2. Amulyaratna B, Sunit Kumar S. Development and in-vitro, in-vivo evaluation of controlled release, biocompatible nanoparticles. Digest J Nanomater Biostruct 2012;7:217-25.
3. Daisy P, Jeeva Kani FG. Evaluation of antidiabetic activity of various extracts of cassia Auriculata Linn. bark on streptozotocin-induced diabetic wistar rats. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2012;(4, Suppl 4):312-8.
4. Dhana lekshmi UM, Poovi G, Neelakanta Reddy P. In-vitro observation of repaglinide engineered polymeric nanoparticles. Digest J Nanomater Biostruct 2012;7:1-18.
5. Jassim ZE, Hussein AA. Formulation and evaluation of clopidogrel tablet incorporating drug nanoparticles. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci 2014;6:838-51.
6. Kaleemuddin M, Srinivas P. Lyophilized oral sustained release polymeric nanoparticles of nateglinide. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech 2013;14:78-85.
7. Box GEP, Wilson KB. On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. J Royal Statistical Soc: Series B 1951;13:1-45.
8. Box GEP, Hunter JS. Multi-factor experimental design for exploring response surfaces. Ann Math Stat 1957;28:195-241.
9. Jain S, Saraf S. Influence of processing variables and in-vitro characterization of glipizide loaded biodegradable nanoparticles. Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research Reviews 2009;3:113-7.
10. Dhana lekshmi UM, Poovi G, Kishore N, Neelakanta Reddy P. In-vitro characterization and in-vivo toxicity study of repaglinide loaded poly (methyl methacrylate) nanoparticles. Int J Pharm 2010;396:194-203.
11. Kashanian S, Azandaryani AH, Derakhshandeh K. New surface-modified solid lipid nanoparticles using N-glutaryl phosphatidylethanolamine as the outer shell. Int J Nanomed 2011;6:2393-401.
12. Hoa LTM, Chi NT, Triet NM, Nhan LNT, Chien DM. Preparation of drug nanoparticles by emulsion evaporation method. J Phys: Conf Ser 2009;187:1-4.
13. Madhavi A, Reddy GS, Suryanarayana MV, Naidu A. Development of a new analytical method for determination of related components in nateglinide. Chromatogra 2008;67:639-45.
14. Yuan XB, Yuan YB, Jiang W, Liu J, Tian EJ, Shun HM, et al. Preparation of rapamycin-loaded chitosan/PLA nanoparticles for immunosuppression in corneal transplantation. Int J Pharm 2008;349:241-8.
15. Marcos F, Sofía N, Karla S, Ana Fernández C, Emilia B. An effective novel delivery strategy of rasagiline for Parkinson's disease. Int J Pharm 2011;419:271-80.
16. Ahn JH, Kim YP, Lee YM, Seo EM, Lee KW, Kim HS. Optimization of microencapsulation of seed oil by response surface methodology. Food Chem 2008;107:98-105.
17. Myers RH, Montgomery DC. Response Surface Methodology. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc; 1995. p. 700.