Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy for solitary renal stones in the CROES URS global study

Journal of Urology

Volumn 194, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 137-143

  Skolarikos, Andreas ^a   Gross, Andreas J ^b   Krebs, Alfred ^c   Unal, Dogan ^d   Bercowsky, Eduardo ^e   Eltahawy, Ehab ^f,g   Somani, Bhaskar ^h   De La Rosette, Jean ⁱ  

^a SISMANOGLIO HOSPITAL   (Greece)

^b ASKLEPIOS HOSPITAL BARMBEK   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSIDAD DEL DESARROLLO   (Chile)

^d HACETTEPE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^e Hospital Mateu Orfila   (Spain)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^g AIN SHAMS UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^h UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SOUTHAMPTON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

body mass index; kidney; nephrolithiasis; treatment outcome; ureteroscopy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEPHROLITHIASIS; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOLITARY KIDNEY; SOLITARY RENAL STONE; URETER SURGERY; CLINICAL TRIAL; EVALUATION STUDY; KIDNEY CALCULI; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETEROSCOPY;

HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETEROSCOPY;

EID: 84940654189     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.112     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. J. de la Rosette, J. Denstedt, P. Geavlete, and et al. The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society Ureteroscopy Global Study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 11,885 patients J Endourol 28 2014 131
2. S. Durrleman, and R. Simon Flexible regression models with cubic splines Stat Med 8 1989 551
3. C. Türk, T. Knoll, A. Petrik, and et al. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis 2014 European Association of Urology Arnhem, The Netherlands
4. J. Kourambas, F.C. Delvecchio, R. Munver, and et al. Nitinol stone retrieval-assisted ureteroscopic management of lower pole renal calculi Urology 56 2000 935
5. B.K. Hollenbeck, T.G. Schuster, G.J. Faerber, and et al. Flexible ureteroscopy in conjunction with in situ lithotripsy for lower pole calculi Urology 58 2001 859
6. Dasgupta P, Cynk MS, Bultitude MF, et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy: prospective analysis of the Guy's experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 86: 367.
7. A.J. Mariani Combined electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy for 20 to 40 mm renal calculi J Urol 172 2004 170
8. M.S. Pearle, J.E. Lingeman, R. Leveillee, and et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less J Urol 179 suppl. 2008 S69
9. H. Jung, B. Norby, and P.J. Osther Retrograde intrarenal stone surgery for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy-resistant kidney stones Scand J Urol Nephrol 40 2006 380
10. A. Breda, O. Ogunyemi, J.T. Leppert, and et al. Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater - is this the new frontier? J Urol 179 2008 981
11. B.I. Chung, M. Aron, N.J. Hegarty, and et al. Ureteroscopic versus percutaneous treatment for medium-size (1-2-cm) renal calculi J Endourol 22 2008 343
12. A.E. Perlmutter, C. Talug, W.F. Tarry, and et al. Impact of stone location on success rates of endoscopic lithotripsy for nephrolithiasis Urology 71 2008 214
13. E.S. Hyams, and O. Shah Percutaneous nephrostolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy/holmium laser lithotripsy: cost and outcome analysis J Urol 182 2009 1012
14. J.M. Riley, L. Stearman, and S. Troxel Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm J Endourol 23 2009 1395
15. A.R. El-Nahas, H.M. Ibrahim, R.F. Youssef, and et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm BJU Int 110 2012 898
16. V. Koo, M. Young, T. Thompson, and et al. Cost-effectiveness and efficiency of shockwave lithotripsy vs flexible ureteroscopic holmium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser lithotripsy in the treatment of lower pole renal calculi BJU Int 108 2011 1913
17. T. Knoll, J.P. Jessen, P. Honeck, and et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus miniaturized PNL for solitary renal calculi of 10-30 mm size World J Urol 29 2011 755
18. J.D. Wiesenthal, D. Ghiculete, R.J. D'A Honey, and et al. A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent? J Endourol 25 2011 481
19. G. Atis, C. Gurbuz, O. Arikan, and et al. Ureteroscopic management with laser lithotripsy of renal pelvic stones J Endourol 26 2012 983
20. J.P. Jessen, P. Honeck, T. Knoll, and et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy for lower pole stones: influence of the collecting system's anatomy J Endourol 28 2014 146
21. S. De, R. Autorino, F.J. Kim, and et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eur Urol 67 2015 125
22. G. Herrera-Gonzalez, C. Netsch, K. Oberhagemann, and et al. Effectiveness of single flexible ureteroscopy for multiple renal calculi J Endourol 25 2011 431
23. H. Ito, T. Kawahara, H. Terao, and et al. Utility and limitation of cumulative stone diameter in predicting urinary stone burden at flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience PLoS One 8 2013 e65060
24. H. Ito, T. Kawahara, H. Terao, and et al. Predictive value of attenuation coefficients measured as Hounsfield units on noncontrast computed tomography during flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience J Endourol 26 2012 1125
25. S.V. Kandasami, C. Mamoulakis, A.R. El-Nahas, and et al. Impact of case volume on outcomes of ureteroscopy for ureteral stones: the clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy global study Eur Urol 66 2014 1046
26. W. Xue, D. Pacik, W. Boellaard, and et al. Management of single large nonstaghorn renal stones in the CROES PCNL global study J Urol 187 2012 1293
27. M.J. Bader, C. Gratzke, S. Walther, and et al. Efficacy of retrograde ureteropyeloscopic holmium laser lithotripsy for intrarenal calculi >2 cm Urol Res 38 2010 397
28. M. Binbay, E. Yuruk, T. Akman, and et al. Is there a difference in outcomes between digital and fiberoptic flexible ureterorenoscopy procedures? J Endourol 24 2010 1929
29. R. Multescu, B. Geavlete, D. Georgescu, and et al. Conventional fiberoptic flexible ureteroscope versus fourth generation digital flexible ureteroscope: a critical comparison J Endourol 24 2010 17
30. J.J. de la Rosette, D. Opondo, F.P. Daels, and et al. Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy Eur Urol 62 2012 246