Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

European Urology

Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 125-137

  De, Shuba ^a   Autorino, Riccardo ^b,c   Kim, Fernando J ^d   Zargar, Homayoun ^a   Laydner, Humberto ^c   Balsamo, Raffaele ^b   Torricelli, Fabio C ^a,e   Di Palma, Carmine ^b   Molina, Wilson R ^d   Monga, Manoj ^a   De Sio, Marco ^b  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS OF CLEVELAND   (United States)

^d DENVER HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Flexible ureteroscopy; Meta analysis; Miniperc; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Renal stones; Retrograde intrarenal surgery

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

BLEEDING; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY SURGERY; META ANALYSIS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NEPHROLITHIASIS; PELVIC PERFORATION; PELVIS INJURY; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; PLEURA DISEASE; PLEURAL INJURY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETER INJURY; URINARY EMBOLIZATION; URINARY TRACT DISEASE; URINE INCONTINENCE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; KIDNEY CALCULI; LENGTH OF STAY; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOMY; PROCEDURES;

BLOOD LOSS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; LENGTH OF STAY; NEPHROSTOMY, PERCUTANEOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84926220106     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.07.003     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. A. Breda, O. Ogunyemi, J.T. Leppert, J.S. Lam, and P.G. Schulam Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater - is this the new frontier? J Urol 179 2008 981 984
2. Türk C, Knoll T, Petrik A, et al. Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Urological Association Web site. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/22%20Urolithiasis-LR.pdf. Updated 2014.
3. J.J.M.C.H. de la Rosette, D. Opondo, and F.P.J. Daels Categorisation of complications and validation of the Clavien score for percutaneous nephrolithotomy Eur Urol 62 2012 246 255
4. M. Monga, and S. Oglevie Minipercutaneous nephorlithotomy J Endourol 14 2000 419 421
5. M.R. Desai, R. Sharma, S. Mishra, R.B. Sabnis, C. Stief, and M. Bader Single-step percutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc): the initial clinical report J Urol 186 2011 140 145
6. M. Grasso, and M. Ficazzola Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi J Urol 162 1999 1904 1908
7. M. Schoenthaler, K. Wilhelm, and A. Katzenwadel Retrograde intrarenal surgery in treatment of nephrolithiasis: is a 100% stone-free rate achievable? J Endourol 26 2012 489 493
8. J. Landman, D.I. Lee, C. Lee, and M. Monga Evaluation of overall costs of concurrently available small flexible ureteroscopes Urology 62 2003 218 222
9. Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, et al. Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine - levels of evidence (March 2009). Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Web site. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1025. Accessed March 30, 2014.
10. Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomized studies in metaanalyses. Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Web site. http://www. ohri.ca/programs/clinical-epidemiology/oxford.asp.
11. H.D. Clark, G.A. Wells, and C. Huët Assessing the quality of randomized trials: reliability of the Jadad scale Control Clin Trials 20 1999 448 452
12. B. Resorlu, A. Unsal, and T. Ziypak Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones World J Urol 31 2013 1581 1586
13. S. Kruck, A.G. Anastasiadis, and T.R. Herrmann Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an alternative to retrograde intrarenal surgery and shockwave lithotripsy World J Urol 31 2013 1555 1561
14. S.P. Hozo, B. Djulbegovic, and I. Hozo Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample BMC Med Res Methodol 5 2005 13
15. T. Akman, M. Binbay, and F. Ozgor Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde flexible nephrolithotripsy for the management of 2-4 cm stones: a matched-pair analysis BJU Int 109 2012 1384 1389
16. O.F. Bozkurt, B. Resorlu, Y. Yildiz, C.E. Can, and A. Unsal Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of 15 to 20 mm J Endourol 25 2011 1131 1135
17. P. Bryniarski, A. Paradysz, M. Zyczkowski, A. Kupilas, K. Nowakowski, and R. Bogacki A randomized controlled study to analyze the safety and efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal stones more than 2 cm in diameter J Endourol 26 2012 52 57
18. U. Ozturk, N.C. Sener, H.N. Goktug, I. Nalbant, A. Gucuk, and M.A. Imamoglu Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi 10-20 mm Urol Int 91 2013 345 349
19. R.B. Sabnis, J. Jagtap, S. Mishra, and M. Desai Treating renal calculi 1-2 cm in diameter with minipercutaneous or retrograde intrarenal surgery: a prospective comparative study BJU Int 110 2012 E346 E349
20. M. Kirac, Bozkurt ÖF, L. Tunc, C. Guneri, A. Unsal, and H. Biri Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in management of lower-pole renal stones with a diameter of smaller than 15 mm Urolithiasis 4 2013 241 246
21. J. Pan, Q. Chen, and W. Xue RIRS versus mPCNL for single renal stone of 2-3 cm: clinical outcome and cost-effective analysis in Chinese medical setting Urolithiasis 41 2013 73 78
22. R.B. Sabnis, R. Ganesamoni, A. Doshi, A.P. Ganpule, J. Jagtap, and M.R. Desai Micropercutaneous nephrolithotomy (microperc) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of small renal calculi: a randomized controlled trial BJU Int 112 2013 355 361
23. N. Rodrigues Netto Jr., G.C. Lemos, P.C. Palma, and J.L. Fiuza Staghorn calculi: percutaneous versus anatrophic nephrolithotomy Eur Urol 15 1988 9 12
24. E.S. Hyams, R. Munver, V.G. Bird, J. Uberoi, and O. Shah Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience J Endourol 24 2010 1583 1588
25. A.J. Mariani Combined electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (greater than 4 cm) renal calculi J Urol 177 2007 168 173
26. J.N. Armitage, J. Withington, and J. van der Meulen Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in England: practice and outcomes described in the Hospital Episode Statistics database BJU Int 113 2014 777 782
27. M.D. Tyson, and M.R. Humphreys Postoperative complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a contemporary analysis by insurance status in the United States J Endourol 28 2014 291 297