Flexible ureterorenoscopy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of lower pole stones of 10-20 mm

BJU International

Volumn 110, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 898-902

  El Nahas, Ahmed R ^a   Ibrahim, Hamdy M ^b   Youssef, Ramy F ^a   Sheir, Khaled Z ^a  

^a MANSOURA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b Fayoum University   (Egypt)

Author keywords

extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; flexible ureteroscopy; lower pole stones

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; ANTIPYRETIC AGENT; CEPHALOSPORIN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE FREE INTERVAL; EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY; FEMALE; FIBERSCOPE ENDOSCOPY; FLEXIBLE URETERORENOSCOPY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY RUPTURE; LOWER POLE STONE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHROLITHIASIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROLITHOTOMY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE FEVER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TREATMENT FAILURE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY CALCULI; LITHOTRIPSY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; URETEROSCOPY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865511436     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10961.x     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Inci K, Sahin A, Islamoglu E, Eren MT, Bakkaloglu M, Ozen H,. Prospective long-term followup of patients with asymptomatic lower pole caliceal stones. J Urol 2007; 177: 2189-92
2. Gerber GS,. Management of lower-pole caliceal stones. J Endourol 2003; 17: 501-3
3. Pearle MS, Lingeman JE, Leveillee R, et al,. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol 2005; 173: 2005-9
4. Lingeman JE, Siegel YI, Steele B, Nyhuis AW, Woods JR,. Management of lower pole nephrolithiasis: a critical analysis. J Urol 1994; 151: 663-7
5. Elbahnasy AM, Shalhav AL, Hoenig DM, et al,. Lower caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy: the impact of lower pole radiographic anatomy. J Urol 1998; 159: 676-82
6. Havel D, Saussine C, Fath C, Lang H, Faure F, Jacqmin D,. Single stones of the lower pole of the kidney: comparative results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 1998; 33: 396-400
7. Grasso M, Ficazzola M,. Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi. J Urol 1999; 162: 1904-8
8. Albala DM, Assimos DG, Clayman RV, et al,. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J Urol 2001; 166: 2072-80
9. Raman JD, Pearle MS,. Management options for lower pole renal calculi. Curr Opin Urol 2008; 18: 214-9
10. Tiselius HG, Ackermann D, Alken P, et al,. Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Urol 2001; 40: 362-71
11. Chung BI, Aron M, Hegarty NJ, Desai MM,. Ureteroscopic versus percutaneous treatment for medium-size (1-2-cm) renal calculi. J Endourol 2008; 22: 343-6
12. Kuo RL, Lingeman JE, Leveillee RJ, et al,. Lower pole II: initial results from a comparison of shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), ureteroscopy (URS), and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy (PNL) for lower pole nephrolithiasis. J Urol 2003; 169 (Suppl.): 486 (abstract in American Urological Association 98th Annual Meeting, 26 April to 1 May 2003, Chicago, IL)
13. McDougall EM, Denstedt JD, Brown RD, Dayman RV, Preminger GM, McClennan BL,. Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of renal calculi in lower pole calices. J Endourol 1989; 3: 265-71
14. Netto NR Jr, Claro JF, Lemos GC, Cortado PL,. Renal calculi in lower pole calices: what is the best method of treatment? J Urol 1991; 146: 721-3
15. Chen RN, Streem SB,. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for lower pole calculi: long-term radiographic and clinical outcome. J Urol 1996; 156: 1572-5
16. Cass AS,. Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis? J Endourol 1996; 10: 17-20
17. 2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent? J Endourol 2011; 25: 481-5
18. Daudan M, Donsimoni R, Hennequin C, et al,. Sex- and age-related composition of 10617 calculi analyzed by infrared spectroscopy. Urol Res 1995; 23: 319-26
19. El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Mansour O, Sheir KZ,. A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 1688-93
20. Andonian S, Okeke Z, Smith AD,. Digital ureteroscopy: the next step. J Endourol 2008; 22: 603-6
21. Stern JM, Yiee J, Park S,. Safety and efficacy of ureteral access sheaths. J Endourol 2007; 21: 119-23
22. Monga M, Best S, Venkatesh R, et al,. Durability of flexible ureteroscopes: a randomized, prospective study. J Urol 2006; 176: 137-41
23. Schuster TG, Hollenbeck BK, Faerber GJ, et al,. Ureteroscopic treatment of lower pole calculi: comparison of lithotripsy in situ and after displacement. J Urol 2002; 168: 43-5