A systematic review: effectiveness of mass media campaigns for reducing alcohol-impaired driving and alcohol-related crashes Health behavior, health promotion and society

BMC Public Health

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-17

  Yadav, Rajendra Prasad ^a   Kobayashi, Miwako ^a  

^a WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MASS MEDIUM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ALCOHOLIC INTOXICATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MASS MEDIA;

EID: 84940641400     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2088-4     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. World Health Organization. Global status report on road safety 2013. Geneva. 2013.
2. World Health Organization. World report on traffic injury prevention. Geneva. 2004.
3. Noar SM. A 10-year retrospective of research in health mass media campaigns: where do we go from here? J Heal Commun Int Perspect. 2006;11:21-42.
4. Snyder LB, Hamilton MA. A meta-analysis of U.S. Health campaign effects on behavior: emphasize enforcement, exposure, and new information, and beware the secular trend. In: Public health communication: evidence for behavior change. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2002. p. 357-84.
5. Derzon J, Lipsey M. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mass-communication for changing substance-use knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour. In: Crano W, Burgoon M, editors. Mass media and drug prevention: classic and contemporary theories and research. Mahwah, NJ: Ehlbaum; 2002. p. 231-58.
6. Cheng H, Kitler P, Lee N. Social marketing for public health: global trends and success stories. Sudbury, Massachusetts: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2010. p. 385.
7. Snitow S, Brennan L. Reducing drink driving road deaths: integrating communication and social policy enforcement in Australia. In: Cheng H, Kotler P, Lee NR, editors. Social marketing for public health: global trends and success stories. Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 2011. p. 383-404.
8. Elder RW, Shults RA, Sleet DA, Nichols JL, Thompson RS, Rajab W. Effectiveness of mass media campaigns for reducing drinking and driving and alcohol-involved crashes: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:57-65.
9. Edelman D, Salsberg B. Beyond paid media: marketing's new vocabulary. 2010. p. 1-8.
10. Gil de Zúñiga H, Jung N, Valenzuela S. Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. J Comput Commun. 2012;17:319-36.
11. Gold J, Pedrana A, Sacks-Davis R, Hellard M, Chang S, Howard S, et al. A systematic examination of the use of online social networking sites for sexual health promotion. BMC Public Health. 2011;11.
12. Hamm MP, Shulhan J, Williams G, Milne A, Scott SD, Harling L. A systematic review of the use and effectiveness of social media in child health. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14.
13. Livingston J, Tugwell A, Korf-Uzan K, Cianfrone M, Coniglio C. Evaluation of a campaign to improve awareness and attitudes of young people towards mental health issues. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2013;48:965-73.
14. Goss CW, Van Bramer LD, Gliner JA, Porter TR, Roberts IG, DiGuiseppi C. Increased police patrols for preventing alcohol-impaired driving. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;4:CD005242.
15. McLean A, Kloeden C, McCaul K. Drink-driving in the general night-time driving population, Adelaide 1989. Aust J Public Health. 1991;15:190-3.
16. Voas R, Romano E, Peck R. Validity of surrogate measures of alcohol involvement when applied to nonfatal crashes. Accid Anal Prev. 2009;41:522-30.
17. Risk of Bias - EPOC specific http://epoc.cochrane.org/sites/epoc.cochrane.org/files/uploads/Suggested%20risk%20of%20bias%20criteria%20for%20EPOC%20reviews.pdf
18. Whittam K, Dwyer W, Simpson P. Effectiveness of a media campaign to reduce traffic crashes involving young drivers. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2006;36:614-28.
19. Murry J, Stam A, Lastovicka JL. Evaluating and anti-drinking and driving advertising campaign with a sample survey and time series intervention analysis. J Am Stat Assoc. 1993;88:50-6.
20. Newstead S, Cameron M, Gantzer S, Vulcan P. Modelling of some major factors influencing road trauma trends in Victoria 1989-93. 1995.
21. Tay R, Ozanne L. Who are we scaring with high fear road safety advertising campaigns? Asia Pacific J Transp. 2002;4:1-12.
22. Jones R, Rodriguez-Iglesias C, Cyr E. Evaluation of Pueblo County. Springfield: Colorado's Smart Roads Project; 2005.
23. Fell JC, Tippetts AS, Levy M. Evaluation of seven publicized enforcement demonstration programs to reduce impaired driving: Georgia, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Indiana, and Michigan. Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008;52:23-38.
24. Zwicker T, Chaudhary N, Solomon M, Siegler J, Meadows J. West Virginia's impaired driving high visibility enforcement campaign, 2003-2005. Virginia: Springfield; 2007.
25. Zwicker T, Chaudhary N, Maloney S, Squeglia R. Conneticut's 2003 impaired-driving high-visibility enforcement campaign. Virginia: Springfield; 2007.
26. Lacey J, Kelly-Baker T, Brainard K, Tippets S, Lyakhovich M. Evaluation of the checkpoint strikeforce program. Washington DC. 2008.
27. Agent KR, Green ER, Langley RE. Evaluation of Kentucky's "You Drink and Drive. You Lose" Campaign. 2002. p. 31.
28. Solomon MG, Hedlund J, Haire E, Chaffe RHB. The 2006 National Labor Day impaired driving enforcement crackdown: drunk driving. Over limit. Under arrest. Washington DC. 2008.
29. Epperlein T. Initial deterrent effects of the crackdown on drinking drivers in the state of Arizona. Accid Anal Prev. 1987;19:285-303.
30. Miller T, Blewden M, Zhang J. Cost savings from a sustained compulsory breath testing and media campaign in New Zealand. Accid Anal Prev. 2004;36:783-94.
31. Beck KH. Lessons learned from evaluating Maryland's anti-drunk driving campaign: assessing the evidence for cognitive, behavioral, and public health impact. Health Promot Pract. 2009;10:370-7.
32. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Evaluation of the national impaired driving high-visibility enforcement campaign: 2003-2005. 2007.
33. Suriyawongpaisal P, Plitapolkarnpim A, Tawonwanchai A. Application of 0.05 per cent legal blood alcohol limits to traffic injury control in Bangkok. J Med Assoc Thai. 2002;85:496-501.
34. Zampetti R, Messina G, Quercioli C, Vencia F, Genco L, Bartolomeo LD, et al. Nonfatal road traffic injuries: can road safety campaigns prevent hazardous behavior? An Italian experience. Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14:261-6.
35. Worden J, Waller J, Riley T. The Vermont public education campaign in alcohol and highway safety: a final review and evaluation. Waterbury; CRASH report I-5. 1975.
36. Cameron M, Vulkan P. Evaluation review of the supplementary road safety package and its outcomes during the first two years. New Zealand: Auckland; 1998.