Interpreting and inverting with less cursing: A guide to interpreting IRAP data

Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

Volumn 4, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 157-162

  Hussey, Ian ^a   Thompson, Miles ^b   McEnteggart, Ciara ^a   Barnes Holmes, Dermot ^c   Barnes Holmes, Yvonne ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure; IRAP

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940581456     PISSN: 22121447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2015.05.001     Document Type: Note

References (29)

1. Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (Version 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014). Maynooth, Ireland. Retrieved from 〈IRAPresearch.org〉.
2. Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Hussey, I. (in press). Relational frame theory: Finding its historical and intellectual roots and reflecting upon its future development. In: Hayes, S.C., Barnes-Holmes, D., Zettle, R.D., Biglan, A. (Eds.), Handbook of contextual behavioral science. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
3. Barnes-Holmes D., Barnes-Holmes Y., Stewart I., Boles S. A sketch of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) and the Relational Elaboration and Coherence (REC) model. The Psychological Record 2010, 60:527-542.
4. Barnes-Holmes D., Murtagh L., Barnes-Holmes Y., Stewart I. Using the Implicit Association Test and the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure to measure attitudes toward meat and vegetables in vegetarians and meat-eaters. The Psychological Record 2010, 60:287-306.
5. Balota D.A., Yap M.J. Moving beyond the mean in studies of mental chronometry: The power of response time distributional analyses. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2011, 20(3):160-166. 10.1177/0963721411408885.
6. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 1977, Academic Press, New York.
7. De Houwer J., Moors A. Implicit measures: Similarities and differences. Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications 2010, 176-193. Guildford Press, New York, NY.
8. De Houwer J., Moors A. How to define and examine implicit processes. Psychology of science: Implicit and explicit processes 2012, 183-198. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Gawronski B., De Houwer J. Implicit measures in social and personality psychology. Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology 2011, Vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
10. Greenwald A.G., McGhee D.E., Schwartz J.L. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1998, 74(6):1464-1480.
11. Greenwald A.G., Nosek B.A., Banaji M.R. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2003, 85(2):197-216. 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197.
12. Hayes S.C., Barnes-Holmes D., Roche B. Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition 2001, Plenum Press, New York.
13. Hayes S.C., Barnes-Holmes D., Wilson K.G. Contextual behavioral science: Creating a science more adequate to the challenge of the human condition. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 2012, 1(1-2):1-16. 10.1016/j.jcbs.2012.09.004.
14. Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (in press). Relational frame theory: The basic account. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, R. D. Zettle, & A. Biglan (Eds.), Handbook of contextual behavioral science. New York, NY: Wiley-Blackwell.
15. Hughes S., Barnes-Holmes D., Vahey N. Holding on to our functional roots when exploring new intellectual islands: A voyage through implicit cognition research. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 2012, 1(1-2):17-38. 10.1016/j.jcbs.2012.09.003.
16. Hussey I., Barnes-Holmes D. The implicit relational assessment procedure as a measure of implicit depression and the role of psychological flexibility. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 2012, 19(4):573-582. 10.1016/j.cbpra.2012.03.002.
17. Hussey I., Barnes-Holmes D., Barnes-Holmes Y. From Relational Frame Theory to implicit attitudes and back again: Clarifying the link between RFT and IRAP research. Current Opinion in Psychology 2015, 2:11-15. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.009.
18. Kelly A., Barnes-Holmes D. Implicit attitudes towards children with autism versus normally developing children as predictors of professional burnout and psychopathology. Research in Developmental Disabilities 2013, 34(1):17-28.
19. Kishita N., Takashi M., Ohtsuki T., Barnes-Holmes D. Measuring the effect of cognitive defusion using the implicit relational assessment procedure: An experimental analysis with a highly socially anxious sample. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 2014, 3:8-15. 10.1016/j.jcbs.2013.12.001.
20. Milne, R., Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Stewart, I. (2005). Measures of attitudes to autism using the IAT and IRAP. In Presented at the 31st annual convention of the association for behavior analysis, Chicago, IL, USA.
21. Nicholson E., Barnes-Holmes D. Developing an implicit measure of disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity: Examining the role of implicit disgust propensity and sensitivity in obsessive-compulsive tendencies. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2012, 43(3):922-930. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.02.001.
22. Nicholson E., Barnes-Holmes D. The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) as a measure of spider fear. The Psychological Record 2012, 62(2):263-278.
23. Nosek, B. A., Bar-Anan, Y., Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2013).Understanding and using the Brief Implicit Association Test: Recommended scoring procedures. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from: . http://ssrn.com/abstract=2196002.
24. Ratcliff R. Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin 1993, 114(4):510-532.
25. Remue J., De Houwer J., Barnes-Holmes D., Vanderhasselt M.A., De Raedt R. Self-esteem revisited: Performance on the implicit relational assessment procedure as a measure of self-versus ideal self-related cognitions in dysphoria. Cognition & Emotion 2013, 27(8):1441-1449.
26. Sriram, N., Nosek, B. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2006). Scale invariant contrasts of response latency distributions. Unpublished manuscript. Retrieved from: . http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2213910.
27. Vahey N.A., Barnes-Holmes D., Barnes-Holmes Y., Stewart I. A first test of the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a measure of self-esteem: Irish prisoner groups and university students. The Psychological Record 2010, 59(3):4.
28. Vahey N.A., Nicholson E., Barnes-Holmes D. A meta-analysis of criterion effects for the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP) in the clinical domain. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 2015, 48:59-65. 10.1016/j.jbtep.2015.01.004.
29. Whelan R. Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record 2008, 58(3):475-482.