How to Define and Examine Implicit Processes?

Psychology of Science: Implicit and Explicit Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  De Houwer, Jan ^a   Moors, Agnes ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Automaticity; Cognitive decompositional approach; Functional decompositional approach; Implicit processes; Mental processes; Scientific behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921714811     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199753628.003.0008     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Bargh, J. A. (1989). Conditional automaticity: Varieties of automatic influence in social perception and cognition. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 3-51). New York: Guilford Press.
2. Bargh, J. A. (1992). The ecology of automaticity: Toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. American Journal of Psychology, 105, 181-199.
3. Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In R. S. Wyer & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 1-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4. Block, N. (1995). On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 227-287.
5. Degner, J. (2009). On the (un)controllability of affective priming: Strategic manipulation is feasible but can possibly be prevented. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 327-354.
6. De Houwer, J. (2006). What are implicit measures and why are we using them? In R. W. Wiers & A. W. Stacy (Eds.), The handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 11-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. De Houwer, J. (2011). Why a cognitive approach in psychology would benefit from a functional approach and vice versa. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 202-209.
8. De Houwer, J., Gawronski, B., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2010). A functional-cognitive framework for attitude research. Manuscript submitted for publication.
9. De Houwer, J., & Moors, A. (2007). How to define and examine the implicitness of implicit measures. In B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes: Procedures and controversies (pp. 179-194). New York: Guilford Press.
10. De Houwer, J., & Moors, A. (2010). Implicit measures: Similarities and differences. In B. Gawronski & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 176-193). New York: Guilford Press.
11. De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009a). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 347-368.
12. De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009b). Theoretical claims necessitate basic research. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 377-379.
13. Dijksterhuis, A., & Nordgren, L. F. (2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 95-109.
14. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition, 25, 582-602.
15. Evans, J. St. B. T. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 255-278.
16. Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object-evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25, 603-637.
17. Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
18. Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 229-238.
19. Gawronski, B., Deutsch, R., LeBel, E. P., & Peters, K. R. (2008). Response interference as a mechanism underlying implicit measures: Some traps and gaps in the assessment of mental associations with experimental paradigms. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 218-225.
20. Gemar, M. C., Segal, Z. V., Sagrati, S., & Kennedy, S. J. (2001). Mood-induced changes on the implicit association test in recovered depressed patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 110, 282-289.
21. Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4-27.
22. Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.
23. Hayes, S. C., & Brownstein, A. J. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view of the purposes of science. Behavior Analyst, 9, 175-190.
24. Hermans, D., Crombez, G., & Eelen, P. (2000). Automatic attitude activation and efficiency: The fourth horseman of automaticity. Psychologica Belgica, 40, 3-22.
25. Keren, G. B., & Schul, Y. (2009). Two is not always better than one: A critical evaluation of two-systems theories. Perspectives on Psychological Sciences, 4, 533-550.
26. Logan, G. D. (1985). Skill and automaticity: Relations, implications, and future directions. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 39, 367-386.
27. Logan, G. D. (1989). Automaticity and cognitive control. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 52-74). New York: Guilford Press.
28. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: Freeman.
29. Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006a). Automaticity: A conceptual and theoretical analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 297-326.
30. Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2006b). Problems with dividing the realm of cognitive processes. Psychological Inquiry, 17, 199-204.
31. Moors, A., & De Houwer, J. (2007). What is automaticity? An analysis of its component features and their interrelations. In J. A. Bargh (Ed.), Automatic processes in social thinking and behavior (pp. 11-50). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
32. Moors, A., Spruyt, A., & De Houwer, J. (2010). In search of a measure that qualifies as implicit: Recommendations based on a decompositional view of automaticity. In B. Gawronski, & B. K. Payne (Eds.), Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications (pp. 19-37). New York: Guilford Press.
33. Naccache, L., Blandin, E., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Unconscious masked priming depends on temporal attention. Psychological Science, 13, 416-424.
34. Nosek, B. A., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). (Part of) the case for a pragmatic approach to validity: Comment on De Houwer, Teige-Mocigemba, Spruyt, and Moors (2009). Psychological Bulletin, 135, 373-376.
35. Richardson-Klavehn, A., Lee, M. G., Joubran, R., & Bjork, R. A. (1994). Intention and awareness in perceptual identification priming. Memory and Cognition, 22, 293-312.
36. Schacter, D. L. (1987). Implicit memory: History and current status. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 501-518.
37. Schwarz, N. (2007). Attitude construction: Evaluation in context. Social Cognition, 25, 638-656.
38. Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
39. Wiers, R.W., & Stacy A.W. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.