The influence of uncertainty in the development of a CO2 infrastructure network

Applied Energy

Volumn 158, Issue , 2015, Pages 332-347

  Knoope, M M J ^a   Ramirez A ^a   Faaij, A P C ^b  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Carbon capture and storage; CO2 infrastructure; Optimization; Real option theory; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; COSTS; INVESTMENTS; OPTIMIZATION; TRANSPORTATION; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGE; CARBON DIOXIDE CAPTURE AND STORAGE; INFRASTRUCTURE NETWORKS; PERFECT FORESIGHTS; REAL OPTION APPROACHES; REAL OPTION THEORY; TRANSPORTATION NETWORK; UNCERTAINTY;

CARBON CAPTURE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT; INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; VOLATILIZATION;

EID: 84940500995     PISSN: 03062619     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.024     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Moomaw W., Yamba F., Kamimoto M., Maurice L., Nyboer J., Urama K., et al. Renewable energy and climate change. IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation 2011, 1-68. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, USA. O. Edenhofer, R.P. Madruga, Y. Sokona (Eds.).
2. IEA World energy outlook 2010 2010, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France.
3. European Commission. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050. COM (2011) 112 final; 2011. p. 1-16.
4. IEA Technology Roadmap. Carbon capture and storage 2010, IEA publications, Paris, France.
5. Benson S.M., Bennaceur K., Cook P., Davison J., de Coninck H., Farhat K., et al. Carbon capture and storage. Global Energy Assessment (GEA). Towards a sustainable future 2012, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK and New York, NY, USA, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria, Chapter 13. p. 993-1068. T.B. Johansson, N. Nakicenovic, A. Patwardhan, L. Gomez-Echeverri (Eds.).
6. 2 storage supply curve for North America; 2004. PNWD-3471. p. 1-92.
7. 2 storage cost curve and analysis of the potential for large scale carbon dioxide capture and storage in the people's Republic of China. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy; 2009. PNNL-19091. p. 1-85.
8. Middleton R.S., Bielicki J.M. A scalable infrastructure model for carbon capture and storage: SimCCS. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1052-1060.
9. 2 avoided. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 8:150-168.
10. Sun L., Chen W. The improved ChinaCCS decision support system: a case study for Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China. Appl Energy 2013, 112:793-799.
11. 2 pipeline infrastructure: an analysis of global challenges and opportunities. IEA GHG; 2010. p. 1-134.
12. 2 storage infrastructure using a GIS based linear optimization energy model. Environ Modell Softw 2010, 25:1754-1768.
13. 2 in the Utsira formation as part of a long term Dutch CCS strategy: an evaluation based on a GIS/MARKAL toolbox. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:351-366.
14. Piessens K, Welkenhuysen K, Laenen B, Ferket H, Nijs W, Duerinck J, et al. Policy support system for carbon capture and storage and collaboration between Belgium - The Netherlands - "PSS-CCS". Final report ed. Brussels: Belgian Science Policy; 2012.
15. Piessens K, Laenen B, Nijs W, Mathieu P, Baele JM, Hendriks C, et al. Policy support system for carbon capture and storage; 2008. SD/CP/04A. p. 1-269.
16. 2 transport network. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 7:48-61.
17. 2 capture and storage infrastructure. Environ Modell Softw 2012, 37:193-205.
18. Oei P., Herold J., Mendelevitch R. Modeling a carbon capture, transport, and storage infrastructure for Europe. Environ Model Assess 2014, 19:515-531.
19. 2 transport and storage infrastructure. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 8:132-142.
20. 2 transport through use of a trunk pipeline. Energy Convers Manage 2010, 51:2825-2834.
21. 2 infrastructure in North-Western Europe: legalities, costs and organizational aspects. Energy Proc 2011, 4:2409-2416.
22. 2 Europipe; 2011. D3.3.1:1-48.
23. Dixit A.K., Pindyck R.S. Investment under uncertainty 1994, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, U.S.A.
24. Hull J.C. Options, futures, and other derivative securities 1993, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, U.S.A. 2nd ed.
25. Reinelt P.S., Keith D.W. Carbon capture retrofits and the cost of regulatory uncertainty. Energy J 2007, 28:101-127.
26. 2 price caps on electricity investments - a real options analysis. Energy Policy 2008, 36:3974-3981.
27. Zhu L., Fan Y. A real options-based CCS investment evaluation model: case study of China's power generation sector. Appl Energy 2011, 88:4320-4333.
28. Zhang X., Wang X., Chen J., Xie X., Wang K., Wei Y. A novel modeling based real option approach for CCS investment evaluation under multiple uncertainties. Appl Energy 2014, 113:1059-1067.
29. 2 prices and carbon capture investments. Energy Econ 2008, 30:2992-3015.
30. Cardin M., Ranjbar-Bourani M., De Neufville R. Improving the lifecycle performance of engineering projects with flexible strategies: example of on-shore LNG production design. Syst Eng 2015, 18:253-268.
31. de Neufville R. Flexibility in engineering design. Using flexibility to creating value. In: CRAG-IRGC symposium; 2013.
32. de Neufville R., Scholtes S., Wang T. Real options by spreadsheet: parking garage case example. J Infrastruct Syst 2006, 12:107-111.
33. 2 pipeline configurations for point-to-point pipelines and simple networks. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2014, 22:25-46.
34. Heydari S., Ovenden N., Siddiqui A. Real options analysis of investment in carbon capture and sequestration technology. Comput Manage Sci 2012, 9:109-138.
35. Fuss S., Szolgayova J., Obersteiner M., Gusti M. Investment under market and climate policy uncertainty. Appl Energy 2008, 85:708-721.
36. Sarkis J., Tamarkin M. Real options analysis for "Green Trading": the case of greenhouse gases. Eng Econ: J Devoted Problems Capital Invest 2005, 50:273-294.
37. Kato M., Zhou Y. A basic study of optimal investment of power sources considering environmental measures: economic evaluation of CCS through a real option approach. Electr Eng Jpn 2011, 174:9-16.
38. Energy Information Administration. Energy policy act transportation study: interim report on natural gas flows and rates; 1995. DOE/EIA-0602(95):1-139.
39. Hacura A., Jadamus-Hacura M., Kocot A. Risk analysis in investment appraisal based on the Monte Carlo simulation technique. Eur Phys J B 2001, 20:551-553.
40. Van den Broek M., Faaij A., Turkenburg W. Planning for an electricity sector with carbon capture and storage. Case of the Netherlands. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2:105-129.
41. 2 capture and storage given a price on carbon. Int Regional Sci Rev 2011, 34:285-305.
42. AMPL. AMPL. Streamlined modelling for real optimization; 2014.
43. IBM ILOG. IBM ILOG CPLEX Optimization Studio V12.6.1 Documentation; 2015.
44. IEA World energy outlook 2013 2013, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France.
45. IEA Energy Technology Perspective 2012 2012, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)/International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France.
46. 2 Capture. Post-demonstration CCS in the EU; 2011. p. 1-81.
47. Chladná Z, Chladný M, Möllersten K, Obersteiner M. Investment under multiple uncertainties: the case of future pulp and paper mills. Interim report of the International Institute for applied systems analysis; 2004. IR-04-077:1-53.
48. Ho S.P., Liu L.Y. An option pricing-based model for evaluating the financial viability of privatized infrastructure projects. Constr Manage Econ 2002, 20:143-156.
49. 2 removal from pulp mills - process integration consequences. Energy Convers Manage 2007, 48:3025-3033.
50. Johnke B. Emissions from waste incinerations. Background papers. IPCC experts meetings on good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories 2002, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Japan, p. 455-468. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Ed.).
51. 2 capture project. Capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide from combustion sources 2005, 561-579. Elsevier Ltd., The Netherlands. D.C. Thomas (Ed.).
52. 2 from combustion of fossil fuel. 2nd ed., The GESTCO project. Summary report. European Union Fifth Framework Programme for Research and Development; 2004. p. 1-32.
53. Neele F. CATO2 sink database; 2013.
54. Natural Gas Supply Association. Pipeline cost recovery report. 32 Major pipelines; 2005-2009. p. 1-142.
55. Chemical Engineering. Chemical plant cost index (CEPCI); 2013.
56. 2 storage options. TNO report 2012. TNO-060-UT-2012-00414/B. p. 1-93.
57. 2 storage in aquifers and hydrocarbon fields in the Netherlands; 2014.
58. Verweij J.M., Simmelink H.J., Van Balen R.T., David P. History of petroleum systems in the southern part of the Broad Fourteens Basin. Neth J Geosci 2003, 82:71-90.
59. Koller T., Goedhart M., Wessels D. Valuation. Measuring and managing the value of companies 2010, New Jersey, USA, John Wiley & Sons, inc. 5th ed.
60. Brown DR, Humphreys KK, Vail LW. Carbon dioxide control costs for gasification combined-cycle plants in the United States. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy; 1993. PNL-SA-22634:1-94.
61. 2 pipelines. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2014, 29:104-124.
62. Energy Information Administration. Short-term energy outlook market prices and uncertainty report. Independent Statistics & Analysis; 2014 October 1-11.
63. ter Mors E., Terwel B.W., Daamen D.D.L. The potential of host community compensation in facility siting. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 11(Supplement):S130-S138.
64. OANDA. Historical exchange rates. OANDA; 2014.
65. 2 capture technologies for carbon-intensive industrial processes. Prog Energy Combust 2012, 38:87-112.
66. Zhou W., Zhu B., Fuss S., Szolgayová J., Obersteiner M., Fei W. Uncertainty modeling of CCS investment strategy in China's power sector. Appl Energy 2010, 87:2392-2400.
67. Abadie L.M., Galarraga I., Rübbelke D. Evaluation of two alternative carbon capture and storage technologies: a stochastic model. Environ Modell Softw 2014, 54:182-195.
68. Oda J., Akimoto K. An analysis of CCS investment under uncertainty. Energy Proc 2011, 4:1997-2004.
69. Energy and Environment Analysis. Characterization of the U.S. industrial/commercial boiler population. Prepared for Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2005. p. 1-65.
70. 2 capture from industrial CHPs. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:511-524.
71. 2 capture from distributed energy systems. Renew Sust Energy Rev 2013, 19:328-347.
72. Hendriks C, Graus W, Van Bergen F. Global carbon dioxide storage potential and costs. Prepared by Ecofys and TNO by order of the Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu; 2004. EEP-02001:1-59.