A basic study of optimal investment of power sources considering environmental measures: Economic evaluation of CCS through a real options approach

Electrical Engineering in Japan (English translation of Denki Gakkai Ronbunshi)

Volumn 174, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 9-17

  Kato, Moritoshi ^a   Zhou, Yicheng ^a  

^a TEPCO SYSTEMS CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

binomial tree method; carbon credit; CCS; construction time; economic evaluation; real options

Indexed keywords

BINOMIAL TREE METHOD; CARBON CREDIT; CCS; CONSTRUCTION TIME; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; REAL OPTIONS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; COAL; COAL INDUSTRY; COAL STORAGE; DECISION TREES; MAINTENANCE; THERMOELECTRIC POWER PLANTS;

FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS;

EID: 78649883401     PISSN: 04247760     EISSN: 15206416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eej.21065     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Murai S, Fujioka Y., Challenges in the development of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies., IEEJ J, 2007;127(4). (in Japanese)
2. Zhou Y, Kato M. A, basic study on optimal investment of power sources considering environmental measures. 1. Best mix of coal-fired thermal generation methods such as CCS. 2007 Annual Conference of Power & Energy, Society, IEE, Japan. (in Japanese)
3. 2 emission constraints on power source composition. 2007 Joint Technical Meeting on Power Engineering and Power Systems, Engineering, IEE, Japan, PE-07-78, PSE-07-93. (in Japanese)
4. Pindyck RS., Investments of uncertain cost. J Finan Econ 1993;34: 53-76 (North-Holland).
5. Dixit AK, Pindyck RS., Investment under uncertainty. Princeton University Press; 1994.
6. Deng SJ, Johnson B, Sogomonian A., Exotic electricity options and the valuation of electricity generation and transmission assets. Decision Support Syst 2001;30: 383-392.
7. Kishida K, Goto M, Ohno T., Valuation of thermal power generation facilities with spike jumps. Japan Association of Real Options and Strategy, Annual Conference, 2006. (in Japanese)
8. Kishida K, Goto M, Ohno T., Valuation of thermal power plants based on market mechanisms. Japan Association of Real Options and Strategy, Annual Conference, 2007. (in Japanese)
9. Gollier C, Proult D, Thais F, Walgenwitz G., Choice of nuclear power investments under price uncertainty: Valuing modularity. Real Options, 8th Annual International Conference, 2004.
10. Mun JC., Real options analysis. John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
11. Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry report, Y02013, 2003. (in Japanese)
12. Kato M, Zhou Y, Takamori H., Decision process of operation and stoppage of a power plant through a real options approach. The Japan Association of Real Option and Strategy, Annual Conference, 2007. (in Japanese)
13. Oda J., Competitive power generation and greenhouse gases. Japan Association of Real Options and Strategy, Annual Conference, 2006. (in Japanese)
14. 2 allowance prices and carbon capture investments. Real Options, 11th Annual International Conference, 2007.
15. Insley M., On the option to invest in pollution control under a regime of tradable emissions allowances., Can J, Econ 2003;36: 860-883.
16. European Climate Exchange., AECX CFI, Futures Contracts: Historic Data 2007[[check]].
17. Japan Electric Power Exchange (in Japanese).
18. DOE/EIA. A Annual Energy Outlook 2007 with Projections to 2030[[check]], Report # DOE/EIA-0383. 2007.
19. Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth (RITE) report. 2006. (in Japanese)
20. Electric Industry Council Report. 2004. (in Japanese)
21. Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry report, Y94009. 1995. (in Japanese)
22. Copeland T, Antikarov V., Real optionsCA practitioner's guide.TEXERE, Thomson; 2003. p 193-243.
23. Luenberger DG., Investment science. Oxford University Press;1998.
24. Trigeorgis L., Real optionsCManagerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. MIT Press; 1996.