Patient-reported quality of life and satisfaction with cosmetic outcomes after breast conservation and mastectomy with and without reconstruction: Results of a survey of breast cancer survivors

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 261, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1198-1206

  Jagsi, Reshma ^a   Li, Yun ^b   Morrow, Monica ^c   Janz, Nancy ^b   Alderman, Amy ^d   Graff, John ^e   Hamilton, Ann ^f   Katz, Steven ^a,b   Hawley, Sarah ^a,b,g  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^d Swan Center for Plastic Surgery   (United States)

^e RUTGERS CANCER INSTITUTE OF NEW JERSEY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g VA ANN ARBOR HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Breast reconstruction; Lumpectomy; Quality of life; Radiation therapy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; PARTIAL MASTECTOMY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CANCER REGISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; ESTHETICS; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; UNITED STATES; URBAN POPULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SEER PROGRAM; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; URBAN POPULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84940458741     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000908     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer: an overview of the randomized trials. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1444-1455.
2. Morrow M, Jagsi R, Alderman AK, et al. Surgeon recommendations and receipt of mastectomy for treatment of breast cancer. JAMA. 2009;302:1551-1556.
3. McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al. Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection ofmastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009;16:2682-2690.
4. Katipamula R, Degnim AC, Hoskin T, et al. Trends in mastectomy rates at the Mayo Clinic Rochester: effect of surgical year and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:4082-4088.
5. Tuttle TM, Habermann EB, Grund EH, et al. Increasing use of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for breast cancer patients: a trend toward more aggressive surgical treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5203-5209.
6. Portschy PR, Tuttle TM. Rise ofmastectomy. J Surg Oncol. 2013;107:563-564.
7. Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Scott A, et al. Satisfaction and quality of life in women who undergo breast surgery: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2009;9:11.
8. Olivotto IA, Whelan TJ, Parpia S, et al. Interim cosmetic and toxicity results from RAPID: a randomized trial of accelerated partial breast irradiation using three-dimensional conformal external beam radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4038-4045.
9. Norris D, Julian TB. Update on the NSABP B-39/RTOG 0413 Clinical Trial comparing partial to whole breast irradiation therapy. Oncol Issues. 2008;20-21.
10. Greenhalgh J, Meadows K. The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: a literature review. J Eval Clin Pract. 1999;5:401-416.
11. Cano SJ, Klassen A, Pusic A. The science behind quality-of-life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:98e-106e.
12. Cano SJ, Klassen AF, Scott AM, et al. A closer look at the BREAST-Q. Clin Plast Surg. 2013;40:287-296.
13. Stanton AL, Krishnan L, Collins CA. Form or function? Part 1: subjective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breastconserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer. 2001;91:2273-2281.
14. Krishnan L, Stanton AL, Collins CA, et al. Form or function? Part 2: objective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer. 2001;91:2282-2287.
15. Alderman AK, Kuhn LE, Lowery JC, et al. Does patient satisfaction with breast reconstruction change over time? Two-year results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204:7-12.
16. Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2007.
17. Hamilton AS, Hofer TP, Hawley ST, et al. Latinas and breast cancer outcomes: population-based sampling, ethnic identity, and acculturation assessment. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:2022-2029.
18. Grovers RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, et al. Survey Methodology. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2009.
19. Kurtz JM. Impact of radiotherapy on breast cosmesis. Breast. 1995;4:163-169.
20. Bentzen SM, Thames HD, Overgaard M: Latent-time estimation for late cutaneous and subcutaneous radiation reactions in a single-follow-up clinical study. Radiother Oncol. 1989;15:267-274.
21. Bentzen SM, Turesson I, Thames HD. Fractionation sensitivity and latency of telangiectasia after postmastectomy radiotherapy: a graded response analysis. Radiother Oncol. 1990;18:95-106.
22. Turesson I. The progression rate of late radiation effects in normal tissue and its impact on dose-response relationships. Radiother Oncol. 1989;15:217-226.
23. Clarke D, Martinez A, Cox RS, et al. Breast edema following staging axillary node dissection in patients with breast carcinoma treated by radical radiotherapy. Cancer. 1982;49:2295-2299.
24. Rose MA, Olivotto I, Cady B, et al. Conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early breast cancer: long-term cosmetic results. Arch Surg. 1989;124:153-157.
25. Harris JR, Levene MB, Svensson G, et al. Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stage 1 and stage 2 carcinoma of the breast. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1979;5:257-261.
26. Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, et al. Effect of esthetic outcome after breastconserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3331-3337.
27. Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1-8.
28. Craft RO, Colakoglu S, Curtis MS, et al. Patient satisfaction in unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1417-1424.
29. Kronowitz S. Current status of implant-based breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:513e-523e.
30. Kronowitz S. Current status of autologous tissue-based breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:282-292.
31. Krueger EA, Wilkins EG, Strawderman M, et al. Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstructionwith andwithout radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;49:713-721.
32. Contant CME, van Geel AN, van der Holt B, et al. Morbidity of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) aftermastectomy by a subpectorally placed silicone prosthesis: the adverse effect of radiotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000;26:344-350.
33. Tallet AV, Salem N, Moutardier V, et al. Radiotherapy and immediate twostage breast reconstruction with a tissue expander and implant: complications and esthetic results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57:136-142.
34. Ascherman JA, Hanasono MM, Newman MI, et al. Implant reconstruction in breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:359-365.
35. Williams JK, Carlson GW, Bostwick J, et al. The effects of radiation treatment after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:1153-1160.
36. Rogers NE, Allen RJ. Radiation effects on breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:1919-1924.
37. Alderman AK, Jagsi R. Discussion: Immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction followed by radiotherapy: risk factors for complications. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;121:635-637.
38. Ho A, Cordeiro P, Disa J, et al. Long-term outcomes in breast cancer patients undergoing immediate 2-stage expander/implant reconstruction and postmastectomy radiation. Cancer. 2012;118:2252-2259.
39. Kronowitz SJ, Lam C, Terefe W, et al. A multidisciplinary protocol for planned skin-preserving delayed breast reconstruction for patients with locally advanced breast cancer requiring postmastectomy radiation: 3-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:2154-2166.
40. Chawla A, Kachnic L, Taghian A, et al. Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: complications and cosmesis with TRAM versus tissue expander/implant. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54:520-526.
41. Chang EI, Liu TS, Festekjian JH, et al. Effects of radiation therapy for breast cancer based on type of free flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1e-8e.
42. Jagsi R, Jiang J, Momoh A, et al. Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:919-926.