Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 26, Issue 20, 2008, Pages 3331-3337

  Waljee, Jennifer F ^a   Hu, Emily S ^a   Ubel, Peter A ^a   Smith, Dylan M ^a   Newman, Lisa A ^a   Alderman, Amy K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST SURGERY; CANCER RECURRENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEPRESSION; EDUCATION; ESTHETICS; FEAR; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTAL MAIL; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RACE DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; STIGMA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ADAPTATION; ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT THERAPY; AGE; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; BREAST TUMOR; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; FOLLOW UP; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; RISK FACTOR; SEGMENTAL MASTECTOMY;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CHEMOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY, SEGMENTAL; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROBABILITY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 49149090054     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.1375     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Hewitt M, Herdman R, Holland J: Meeting the Psychosocial Needs of Women with Breast Cancer. Washington, DC, The National Academies Press, 2004
2. Kuroi K, Shimozuma K, Ohsumi S, et al: Current status of health outcome assessment of medical treatment in breast cancer. Breast Cancer 14:74-80, 2007
3. Ohsumi S, Shimozuma K, Kuroi K, et al: Quality of life of breast cancer patients and types of surgery for breast cancer: Current status and unresolved issues. Breast Cancer 14:66-73, 2007
4. Veronesi U, Banfi A, Salvadori B, et al: Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer: Long-term results of a randomized trial. Eur J Cancer 26:668-670, 1990
5. Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, et al: Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 347:1233-1241, 2002
6. Fisher B, Jeong JH, Anderson S, et al: Twenty-five-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing radical mastectomy, total mastectomy, and total mastectomy followed by irradiation. N Engl J Med 347:567-575, 2002
7. El-Tamer MB, Ward BM, Schifftner T, et al: Morbidity and mortality following breast cancer surgery in women: National benchmarks for standards of care. Ann Surg 245:665-671, 2007
8. Newman LA, Kuerer HM: Advances in breast conservation therapy. J Clin Oncol 23:1685-1697, 2005
9. Nissen MJ, Swenson KK, Ritz LJ, et al: Quality of life after breast carcinoma surgery: A comparison of three surgical procedures. Cancer 91:1238-1246, 2001
10. Shimozuma K, Ganz PA, Petersen L, et al: Quality of life in the first year after breast cancer surgery: Rehabilitation needs and patterns of recovery. Breast Cancer Res Treat 56:45-57, 1999
11. Irwig L, Bennetts A: Quality of life after breast conservation or mastectomy: A systematic review. Aust N Z J Surg 67:750-754, 1997
12. D'Aniello C, Grimaldi L, Barbato A, et al: Cosmetic results in 242 patients treated by conservative surgery for breast cancer. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 33:419-422, 1999
13. Cellini C, Hollenbeck ST, Christos P, et al: Factors associated with residual breast cancer after re-excision for close or positive margins. Ann Surg Oncol 11:915-920, 2004
14. Cellini C, Huston TL, Martins D, et al: Multiple re-excisions versus mastectomy in patients with persistent residual disease following breast conservation surgery. Am J Surg 189:662-666, 2005
15. Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW, Stewart J, et al: The cosmetic outcome in early breast cancer treated with breast conservation. Eur J Surg Oncol 25:566-570, 1999
16. Gold MR, Siegel JE, Russell LB, et al: Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine: Report to the US Public Health Service by the Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Washington, DC, Oxford University Press, 1996
17. Radloff L: The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1:385-401, 1977
18. Smith DM, Sherriff RL, Damschroder L, et al: Misremembering colostomies? Former patients give lower utility ratings than do current patients. Health Psychol 25:688-695, 2006
19. Smith DM, Lowenstein G, Rozin P, et al: Sensitivity to disgust, stigma, and adjustment to life with a colostomy. J Res Pers 41:787-803, 2007
20. Lacey HP, Fagerlin A, Lowenstein G, et al: It must be awful for them: Healthy people overlook disease variability in quality of life judgements. Judg Decis Making 1:146-452, 2006
21. Ubel PA, Hershey J, Baron J, et al: Do nonpatients underestimate the quality of life associated with chronic health decisions because of a focusing illusion? Med Decis Making 21:190-199, 2001
22. Vickberg SM: The Concerns About Recurrence Scale (CARS): A systematic measure of women's fears about the possibility of breast cancer recurrence. Ann Behav Med 25:16-24, 2003
23. Janz NK, Mujahid M, Lantz PM, et al: Population-based study of the relationship of treatment and sociodemographics on quality of life for early stage breast cancer. Qual Life Res 14:1467-1479, 2005
24. Stanton AL, Krishnan L, Collins CA: Form or function? Part 1: Subjective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy. Cancer 91:2273-2281, 2001
25. Mandelblatt JS, Hadley J, Kerner JF, et al: Patterns of breast carcinoma treatment in older women: Patient preference and clinical and physical influences. Cancer 89:561-573, 2000
26. Levy SM, Haynes LT, Herberman RB, et al: Mastectomy versus breast conservation surgery: Mental health effects at long-term follow-up. Health Psychol 11:349-354, 1992
27. Levy SM, Herberman RB, Lee JK, et al: Breast conservation versus mastectomy: Distress sequelae as a function of choice. J Clin Oncol 7:367-375, 1989
28. Al-Ghazal SK, Blamey RW: Cosmetic assessment of breast-conserving surgery for primary breast cancer. Breast 8:162-168, 1999
29. Fallowfield LJ, Baum M, Maguire GP: Effects of breast conservation on psychological morbidity associated with diagnosis and treatment of early breast cancer. BMJ (Clin Res Ed) 293:1331-1334, 1986
30. Hopwood P, Haviland J, Mills J, et al: The impact of age and clinical factors on quality of life in early breast cancer: An analysis of 2208 women recruited to the UK START Trial (Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy Trial). Breast 16:241-251, 2007
31. Cohen L, Hack TF, de Moor C, et al: The effects of type of surgery and time on psychological adjustment in women after breast cancer treatment. Ann Surg Oncol 7:427-434, 2000
32. Arora NK, Gustafson DH, Hawkins RP, et al: Impact of surgery and chemotherapy on the quality of life of younger women with breast carcinoma: A prospective study. Cancer 92:1288-1298, 2001