Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 32, Issue 9, 2014, Pages 919-926

  Jagsi, Reshma ^a   Jiang, Jing ^a   Momoh, Adeyiza O ^a   Alderman, Amy ^b   Giordano, Sharon H ^a   Buchholz, Thomas A ^a   Kronowitz, Steven J ^a   Smith, Benjamin D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b Swan Center for Plastic Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST RECONSTRUCTION; CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; FEMALE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; INCOME; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MASTECTOMY; PLASTIC SURGEON; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; AUTOTRANSPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANT; BREAST TUMOR; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RISK; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; SURGICAL FLAPS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; BREAST IMPLANTS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMAPLASTY; MASTECTOMY, MODIFIED RADICAL; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; SURGICAL FLAPS; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84899624940     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: 15277755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2013.52.2284     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Wilkins EG, Cederna PS, Lowery JC, et al: Prospective analysis of psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: One-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg 106:1014-1025, 2000
2. Atisha D, Alderman AK, Lowery JC, et al: Prospective analysis of long-term psychosocial outcomes in breast reconstruction: Two-year postoperative results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcomes Study. Ann Surg 247:1019-1028, 2008 (Pubitemid 351770423)
3. Rowland JH, Desmond KA, Meyerowitz BE, et al: Role of breast reconstructive surgery in physical and emotional outcomes among breast cancer survivors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:1422-1429, 2000
4. Al-Ghazal SK, Fallowfield L, Blamey RW: Comparison of psychological aspects and patient satisfaction following breast conserving surgery, simple mastectomy and breast reconstruction. Eur J Cancer 36:1938-1943, 2000
5. Alderman AK, McMahon L Jr, Wilkins EG: The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:695-703, 2003 (Pubitemid 36182312)
6. Christian CK, Niland J, Edge SB, et al: A multi-institutional analysis of the socioeconomic determinants of breast reconstruction: A study of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Ann Surg 243:241-249, 2006 (Pubitemid 43185444)
7. Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Janz NK, et al: Racial and ethnic disparities in the use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction: Results from a population-based study. J Clin Oncol 27:5325-5330, 2009
8. Reuben BC, Manwaring J, Neumayer LA: Recent trends in immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy in the United States. Am J Surg 198:237-243, 2009
9. Polednak AP: How frequent is postmastectomy breast reconstructive surgery? A study linking two statewide databases. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:73-77, 2001
10. American Cancer Society: Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act: The Federal Law, 9/12 update. http://www.cancer.org/treatment/findingandpayingfor treatment/managinginsuranceissues/womens-health-and-cancer-rights-act
11. Alderman AK, Wei Y, Birkmeyer JD: Use of breast reconstruction after mastectomy following the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act. JAMA 295:387-388, 2006 (Pubitemid 43144974)
12. Tuttle TM, Jarosek S, Habermann EB, et al: Increasing rates of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among patients with ductal carcinoma in situ. J Clin Oncol 27:1362-1367, 2009
13. Habermann EB, Abbott A, Parsons HM, et al: Are mastectomy rates really increasing in the United States? J Clin Oncol 28:3437-3441, 2010
14. McGuire KP, Santillan AA, Kaur P, et al: Are mastectomies on the rise? A 13-year trend analysis of the selection of mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy in 5865 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2682-2690, 2009
15. Jones NB, Wilson J, Kotur L, et al: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer: An increasing trend at a single institution. Ann Surg Oncol 16:2691-2696, 2009
16. Hawley S, Jagsi R, Katz SJ: Is contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) overused? Results from a population-based study. J Clin Oncol 30, 2012 (suppl 34s, abstr 26)
17. Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S, et al: Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet 366:2087-2106, 2005 (Pubitemid 41797643)
18. Overgaard M, Hansen PS, Overgaard J, et al: Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial. N Engl J Med 337:949-955, 1997 (Pubitemid 27425950)
19. Overgaard M, Jensen MB, Overgaard J, et al: Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breast-cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomised trial. Lancet 353:1641-1648, 1999 (Pubitemid 29224519)
20. Ragaz J, Jackson SM, Le N, et al: Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer. N Engl J Med 337:956-962, 1997 (Pubitemid 27425951)
21. Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, et al: A paradigm shift in US breast reconstruction: Increasing implant rates. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:15-23, 2013
22. Yang RL, Newman AS, Lin IC, et al: Trends in immediate breast reconstruction across insurance groups after enactment of breast cancer legislation. Cancer 119:2462-2468, 2013
23. Sisco M, Du H, Warner JP, et al: Have we expanded the equitable delivery of postmastectomy breast reconstruction in the new millennium? Evidence from the National Cancer Database. J Am Coll Surg 215:658-666, 2012
24. Alderman AK, Hawley ST, Morrow M, et al: Receipt of delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy: Do women revisit the decision? Ann Surg Oncol 18:1748-1756, 2011
25. Nattinger AB, Laud PW, Bajorunaite R, et al: An algorithm for the use of Medicare claims data to identify women with incident breast cancer. Health Serv Res 39:1733-1749, 2004 (Pubitemid 39601249)
26. Alderman AK, Atisha D, Streu R, et al: Patterns and correlates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction by US plastic surgeons: Results from a national survey. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:1796-1803, 2011
27. Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, et al: Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Reconstr Surg 124:1-8, 2009
28. Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al: Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 125:1585-1595, 2010
29. Alderman AK, Storey AF, Nair NS, et al: Financial impact of breast reconstruction on an academic surgical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1408-1413, 2009
30. Zendejas B, Moriarty JP, O'Byrne J, et al: Cost-effectiveness of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy versus routine surveillance in patients with unilateral breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:2993-3000, 2011
31. Krueger EA, Wilkins EG, Strawderman M, et al: Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49:713-721, 2001 (Pubitemid 32112196)
32. Contant CM, van Geel AN, van der Holt B, et al: Morbidity of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) after mastectomy by a subpectorally placed silicone prosthesis: The adverse effect of radiotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 26:344-350, 2000 (Pubitemid 30465895)
33. Tallet AV, Salem N, Moutardier V, et al: Radiotherapy and immediate two-stage breast reconstruction with a tissue expander and implant: Complications and esthetic results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:136-142, 2003 (Pubitemid 36959749)
34. Ascherman JA, Hanasono MM, Newman MI, et al: Implant reconstruction in breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:359-365, 2006 (Pubitemid 44400618)
35. Williams JK, Carlson GW, Bostwick J III, et al: The effects of radiation treatment after TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 100:1153-1160, 1997 (Pubitemid 27426015)
36. Rogers NE, Allen RJ: Radiation effects on breast reconstruction with the deep inferior epigastric perforator flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1919-1924, 2002 (Pubitemid 34492419)
37. Chawla AK, Kachnic LA, Taghian AG, et al: Radiotherapy and breast reconstruction: Complications and cosmesis with TRAM versus tissue expander/implant. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 54:520-526, 2002 (Pubitemid 35286821)
38. Ho A, Cordeiro P, Disa J, et al: Long-term outcomes in breast cancer patients undergoing immediate 2-stage expander/implant reconstruction and postmastectomy radiation. Cancer 118:2552-2559, 2012
39. Kronowitz SJ, Lam C, Terefe W, et al: A multidisciplinary protocol for planned skin-preserving delayed breast reconstruction for patients with locally advanced breast cancer requiring postmastectomy radiation therapy: 3-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 127:2154-2166, 2011
40. Chang EI, Liu TS, Festekjian JH, et al: Effects of radiation therapy for breast cancer based on type of free flap reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1e-8e, 2013
41. Smith GL, Xu Y, Buchholz TA, et al: Association between treatment with brachytherapy vs whole-breast irradiation and subsequent mastectomy, complications, and survival among older women with invasive breast cancer. JAMA 307:1827-1837, 2012
42. Yalom M: A History of the Breast. New York, NY, Alfred A Knopf, 1997
43. Latteier C: Breasts: The Woman's Perspective on an American Obsession. New York, NY, Haworth Press, 1998
44. Millsted R, Frith H: Being large-breasted: Women negotiating embodiment. Women Stud Int Forum 26:455-465, 2003