Renewable and non-renewable exergy costs and CO2 emissions in the production of fuels for Brazilian transportation sector

Energy

Volumn 88, Issue , 2015, Pages 18-36

  Flórez Orrego, Daniel ^a   da Silva, Julio A M ^b   Velásquez, Héctor ^c   de Oliveira, Silvio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF BAHIA   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

CO2 emissions; Exergy cost; Non renewable; Renewable; Transportation sector

Indexed keywords

BIODIESEL; BIOETHANOL; CARBON DIOXIDE; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; ETHANOL; ETHANOL FUELS; EXERGY; FATTY ACIDS; FOSSIL FUEL POWER PLANTS; GAS INDUSTRY; HYDROELECTRIC POWER; HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANTS; HYDROGEN FUELS; ITERATIVE METHODS; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; NATURAL GAS; NATURAL GAS TRANSPORTATION; NATURAL GAS WELLS; NATURAL GASOLINE PLANTS; PALM OIL; PETROLEUM INDUSTRY; PETROLEUM TRANSPORTATION; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

CO2 EMISSIONS; EXERGY COST; NON-RENEWABLE; RENEWABLE; TRANSPORTATION SECTOR;

FOSSIL FUELS;

BIOFUEL; CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; COST ANALYSIS; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; EXERGY; FOSSIL FUEL; HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANT; NONRENEWABLE RESOURCE; OIL PRODUCTION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

BRAZIL;

EID: 84940438320     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.031     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. 2: moving toward sustainability 2009, International Energy Agency.
2. Hira A., Oliveira L.G. No substitute for oil? How Brazil developed its ethanol industry. Energy Policy 2009, 37(6):2450-2456.
3. BP BP statistical review of world energy - BP energy outlook 2012, 2030, [London, UK].
4. Macedo I., Seabra J., Silva J. Greenhouse gases emissions in the production and use of ethanol from sugarcane in Brazil: the 2005/2006 averages and a prediction for 2020. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32(7):582-595.
5. Macedo I. Feasibility of biomass-derived ethanol as a fuel for transportation - activity 6: potentials in relation to sustainability criteria 2006, SENER/BID, Ciudad de México.
6. NEB National energy balance 2011, [In portguese], [accessed 08.02.2014]; Available from:. https://ben.epe.gov.br/.
7. MME National Energetic Matrix: 2030 2007, Ministry of Mines and Energy, Brasilia.
8. Schmitt W., Szklo A., Schaeffer R. Policies for improving the efficiency of the Brazilian light-duty vehicle fleet and their implications for fuel use, greenhouse gas emissions and land use. Energy Policy 2011, 39(6):3163-3176.
9. MME Monthly bulletin of renewable fuels January 2013, [In Portuguese], No.06, Mines and Energy Ministry.
10. PRONAR First national inventory on atmospheric emissions by road automotive vehicles 2011, Final Report [In Portuguese], Environment Ministry, Brasilia.
11. Beer T., Grant G., Morgan G., Lapszewicz J., Anyon P., Edwards J., et al. Comparison of transport fuels 2001, Australian Greenhouse Office, Melbourne.
12. Hossain I., Gülen G. Lifecycle analysis of different urban transport options for Bangladesh. Energy Policy 2007, 35(10):4909-4918.
13. D'Agosto M., Ribeiro S. Assessing total and renewable energy in Brazilian automotive fuels. A life cycle inventory (LCI) approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2009, 13(6-7):1326-1337.
14. Hawkins T., Singh B., Majeau-Bettez G., Strømman A. Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of conventional and electric vehicles. J Ind Ecol 2013, 17(1):53-64.
15. Ma H., Balthasar F., Tait N., Riera-Palou X., Harrison A. A new comparison between the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles. Energy Policy 2012, 44(0):160-173.
16. Seckin C., Sciubba E., Bayulken A. Extended exergy analysis of Turkish transportation sector. J Clean Prod 2013, 47(0):422-436.
17. Frangopoulos C.A. Thermo-economic functional analysis and optimization. Energy 1987, 12(7):563-571.
18. Lozano M.A., Valero A. Theory of the exergetic cost. Energy 1993, 18(9):939-960.
19. Erlach B., Serra L., Valero A. Structural theory as standard for thermoeconomics. Energy Convers Manag 1999, 40(15-16):1627-1649.
20. Lazzaretto A., Tsatsaronis G. SPECO: a systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Energy 2006, 31(8-9):1257-1289.
21. Torres C., Valero A., Rangel V., Zaleta A. On the cost formation process of the residues. Energy 2008, 33(2):144-152.
22. Santos J.C.S., Nascimento M.A.R., Lora E.E.S., Reyes A.M.M. On the Negentropy application in thermoeconomics: a fictitious or an exergy component flow?. Int J Thermodyn 2009, 12(4):163-176.
23. 2 emission of electricity generation: the brazilian case. Energy Convers Manag 2014, 85:619-629.
24. Flórez-Orrego D. Thermodynamic and environmental comparison of the routes of production and end use of vehicle fuels derived from petroleum and natural Gas, biofuels, hydrogen and electricity (electric vehicle) 2014, 229. [In Portuguese], (MSc). Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of São Paulo, São Paulo.
25. Szargut J., Morris D., Steward F. Exergy analysis of thermal, chemical, and metallurgical processes 1988, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, New York.
26. Sheehan J., Camobreco V., Duffield J., Graboski M., Shapouri S. Life cycle inventory of biodiesel and petroleum diesel for use in an urban bus 1998, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado.
27. 2 allocation for petroleum derived fuels. Energy 2014, 67(0):490-495.
28. Nakashima C.Y., Oliveira S., Caetano E.F. Subsea multiphase pumping system x gas lift: an exergo-economic comparison. Therm Eng 2004, 3(2):107-114.
29. Colebrook C. Turbulent flow in pipes, with particular reference to the transition region between smooth and rough pipe laws. J ICE 01 February 1939, 11(Issue 4):133-156. Paper 5204.
30. TBG, Brazil-Bolivia natural Gas Pipeline. Accessed 08.03.2014; Available from: . http://www.tbg.com.br/portalTBGWeb/ShowProperty/BEA%20Repository/Imagem/Media/carac_fis.
31. Lora E., Nascimento M. Geração Termelétrica Planejamento. Proj Operação 2004, 1. Interciencia.
32. 2 allocation in refineries. Energy 2014, 67:607-616.
33. Hotza D., Diniz da Costa J.C. Fuel cells development and hydrogen production from renewable resources in Brazil. Int J Hydrog Energy 2008, 33(19):4915-4935.
34. Tolmasquim M.T. Fontes renováveis de energia no Brasil 2003, Interciência, Rio de Janeiro.
35. Pereira Hill M. Energy use in transport: comparative analysis of energy efficiency between compressed natural gas and gas-fired electricity at the end use in light vehicles (In Portuguese). Transport engineering 2010, 154. Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.
36. Horta Nogueira L. Does biodiesel make sense?. Energy 2011, 36(6):3659-3666.
37. Font de Mora E., Torres C., Valero A. Assessment of biodiesel energy sustainability using the exergy return on investment concept. Energy 2012, 45(1):474-480.
38. Velásquez H. Exergy and Exergo-environmental evaluation of biofuels production 2009, (In Portuguese), Polytechnic School, Mechanical Engineering Dept (PhD Thesis), University of São Paulo, São Paulo.
39. Velásquez H.I., Oliveira S., Benjumea P., Pellegrini L.F. Exergo-environmental evaluation of liquid biofuel production processes. Energy 2013, 54(0):97-103.
40. Costa R., Lora E., Angarita E., Torres E. Preliminary energy balance of palm oil biodiesel production for brazilian and Colombian conditions (In Portuguese). 6° international congress on distributed generation and energy on country regions 2006, UNICAMP, Campinas.
41. Angarita E., Lora E., Costa R., Torres E. The energy balance in the palm oil-derived Methyl Ester (PME) life cycle for the cases in Brazil and Colombia. Renew Energy 2009, 34(12):2905-2913.
42. Yee K., Tan K., Abdullah A., Lee K. Life cycle assessment of palm biodiesel: revealing facts and benefits for sustainability. Appl Energy 2009, 86(Supplement 1(0)):S189-S196.
43. Cavalett O., Ortega E. Integrated environmental assessment of biodiesel production from soybean in Brazil. J Clean Prod 2010, 18(1):55-70.
44. ANEEL, National Agency of electric energy (In Portuguese), accessed 03.02.2014; Available from:: . http://www.aneel.gov.br/aplicacoes/capacidadebrasil/OperacaoGeracaoTipo.asp?tipo=5%26ger=Combustivel%26principal=Biomassa.
45. CGEE Sustainability of sugarcane bioenergy 2012, 360. Brasil, Strategy Study Centre - CGEE, Brasilia.
46. Ensinas A. Thermal Integration and thermoeconomy optimization applied to industrial process of sugar and ethanol production from sugar cane. Faculty of mechanical engineering 2008, Campinas State University, Campinas, SP.
47. Pellegrini L.F., Oliveira S. Combined production of sugar, ethanol and electricity: Thermoeconomic and environmental analysis and optimization. Energy 2011, 36(6):3704-3715.
48. Bossel U., Eliasson B., Taylor G. The Future of the hydrogen economy: Bright or Bleak?. J KONES Intern Combust Engines 2004, 11(1-2):87-111.
49. EUCAR Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context 2011, European Council for Automotive R&D.