Diverse set of Turing nanopatterns coat corneae across insect lineages

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 112, Issue 34, 2015, Pages 10750-10755

  Blagodatski, Artem ^a   Sergeev, Anton ^b   Kryuchkov, Mikhail ^a,c   Lopatina, Yuliya ^d   Katanaev, Vladimir L ^c,e  

^a INSTITUTE OF PROTEIN RESEARCH   (Russian Federation)

^b INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS OF BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^d MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^e FAR EASTERN FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NANOCOATING; NANOMATERIAL; TURING NANOPATTERN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BEETLE; COCKROACH; CORNEA; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIPTERA; EARWIG; FLEA; HEMIPTERA; HYMENOPTERA; INSECT; LEPIDOPTERA; MECOPTERA; MEGALOPTERA; NEUROPTERA; NONHUMAN; ODONATA; ORTHOPTERA; PLECOPTERA; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSOCOPTERA; RAPHIDIOPTERA; THYSANURA; TRICHOPTERA; ANIMAL; CHEMICAL MODEL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOUND EYE; DIFFUSION; MORPHOGENESIS; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

HEXAPODA; LEPIDOPTERA; PAPILIONOIDEA;

ANIMALS; COMPOUND EYE, ARTHROPOD; CORNEA; DIFFUSION; INSECTS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MORPHOGENESIS; NANOSTRUCTURES; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84940399492     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1505748112     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Gilbert SF (2014) Developmental Biology (Sinauer Assoc, Sunderland, MA), 10th Ed.
2. Stavenga DG, Foletti S, Palasantzas G, Arikawa K. (2006) Light on the moth-eye corneal nipple array of butterflies. Proc Biol Sci 273(1587):661-667.
3. Bernhard CG, Miller W.H. (1962) A corneal nipple pattern in insect compound eyes. Acta Physiol Scand 56:385-386.
4. Bernhard CG, Miller WH, Moller A.R. (1963) Function of the corneal nipples in the compound eyes of insects. Acta Physiol Scand 58:381-382.
5. Bernhard CG, Gemne G, Sällström J (1970) Comparative ultrastructure of corneal surface topography in insects with aspects on phylogenesis and function. J Comp Physiol A 67(1):1-25.
6. Kryuchkov M, et al (2011) Analysis of micro- and nano-structures of the corneal surface of Drosophila and its mutants by atomic force microscopy and optical diffraction. PLoS One 6(7):e22237.
7. Sukontason KL, et al (2008) Ommatidia of blow fly, house fly, and flesh fly: Implication of their vision efficiency. Parasitol Res 103(1):123-131.
8. Watson GS, Myhra S, Cribb BW, Watson J.A. (2008) Putative functions and functional efficiency of ordered cuticular nanoarrays on insect wings. Biophys J 94(8):3352-3360.
9. Dewan R, et al (2012) Studying nanostructured nipple arrays of moth eye facets helps to design better thin film solar cells. Bioinspir Biomim 7(1):016003.
10. Peisker H, Gorb S.N. (2010) Always on the bright side of life: Anti-adhesive properties of insect ommatidia grating. J Exp Biol 213(Pt 20):3457-3462.
11. Huang YF, et al (2007) Improved broadband and quasi-omnidirectional anti-reflection properties with biomimetic silicon nanostructures. Nat Nanotechnol 2(12): 770-774.
12. Palasantzas G, De Hosson JTM, Michielsen KFL, Stavenga DG (2005) Optical properties and wettability of nanostructured biomaterials: Moth eyes, lotus leaves, and insect wings. Handbook of Nanostructured Biomaterials and their Applications in Nanobiotechnology, ed Nalwa HS (Am Sci Publ, Valencia, CA), Vol 1, pp 273-301.
13. Blagodatski A, et al (2014) Under- and over-water halves of Gyrinidae beetle eyes harbor different corneal nanocoatings providing adaptation to the water and air environments. Sci Rep 4:6004.
14. Fröhlich A (2001) A scanning electron-microscopic study of apical contacts in the eye during postembryonic development of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Tissue Res 303(1):117-128.
15. Turing AM (1952) The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos Trans R Soc B 237(641): 37-72.
16. Kondo S, Miura T. (2010) Reaction-diffusion model as a framework for understanding biological pattern formation. Science 329(5999):1616-1620.
17. Nakamasu A, Takahashi G, Kanbe A, Kondo S. (2009) Interactions between zebrafish pigment cells responsible for the generation of Turing patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106(21):8429-8434.
18. Sick S, Reinker S, Timmer J, Schlake T. (2006) WNT and DKK determine hair follicle spacing through a reaction-diffusion mechanism. Science 314(5804):1447-1450.
19. Raspopovic J, Marcon L, Russo L, Sharpe J. (2014) Modeling digits. Digit patterning is controlled by a Bmp-Sox9-Wnt Turing network modulated by morphogen gradients. Science 345(6196):566-570.
20. Miura T, Maini P.K. (2004) Speed of pattern appearance in reaction-diffusion models: Implications in the pattern formation of limb bud mesenchyme cells. Bull Math Biol 66(4):627-649.
21. Tardieu A (1988) Eye lens proteins and transparency: From light transmission theory to solution X-ray structural analysis. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 17:47-70.
22. Miura T, Maini P.K. (2004) Periodic pattern formation in reaction-diffusion systems: An introduction for numerical simulation. Anat Sci Int 79(3):112-123.
23. Chipman AD, et al (2014) The first myriapod genome sequence reveals conservative arthropod gene content and genome organisation in the centipede Strigamia maritima. PLoS Biol 12(11):e1002005.
24. Ishiwata K, Sasaki G, Ogawa J, Miyata T, Su Z.H. (2011) Phylogenetic relationships among insect orders based on three nuclear protein-coding gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 58(2):169-180.
25. Boseman A, Nowlin K, Ashraf S, Yang J, Lajeunesse D. (2013) Ultrastructural analysis of wild type and mutant Drosophila melanogaster using helium ion microscopy. Micron 51:26-35.
26. Meyer-Rochow VB, Stringer I.A. (1993) A system of regular ridges instead of nipples on a compound eye that has to operate near the diffraction limit. Vision Res 33(18):2645-2647.
27. Clay Smith W, Butler J.F. (1991) Ultrastructure of the Tabanidae compound eye: Unusual features for Diptera. J Insect Physiol 37(4):287-296.
28. Parker AR, Hegedus Z, Watts R.A. (1998) Solar-absorber antireflector on the eye of an Eocene fly (45 Ma). Proc R Soc B 265(1398):811-815.
29. Anderson MS, Gaimari S.D. (2003) Raman-atomic force microscopy of the ommatidial surfaces of Dipteran compound eyes. J Struct Biol 142(3):364-368.
30. Chu H, Norris DM, Carlson S.D. (1975) Ultrastructure of the compound eye of the diploid female beetle, Xyleborus ferrugineus. Cell Tissue Res 165(1):23-36.
31. Mishra M, Meyer-Rochow VB (2006) Eye ultrastructure in the pollen-feeding beetle, Xanthochroa luteipennis (Coleoptera: Cucujiformia: Oedemeridae). J Electron Microsc (Tokyo) 55(6):289-300.
32. Dey S, Dkhar B. (1992) An unusual type of corneal nipple in the earwig, Forficula sp., with a possible anti-reflection role. Micron and Microscopica Acta 23(3):337-339.
33. Dey S (1988) Scanning electron microscopic detection of corneal anti-reflection coating in the grasshopper, Epacromia dorsalis and its physiological significance. Vision Res 28(9):975-977.
34. Sheth R, et al (2012) Hox genes regulate digit patterning by controlling the wavelength of a Turing-type mechanism. Science 338(6113):1476-1480.
35. Desai A, Mitchison T.J. (1997) Microtubule polymerization dynamics. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 13:83-117.
36. Alonso U, et al (2011) Colloid diffusion coefficients in compacted and consolidated clay barriers: Compaction density and colloid size effects. Phys Chem Earth Parts ABC 36(17-18):1700-1707.
37. Pumpa M, Cichos F. (2012) Slow single-molecule diffusion in liquid crystals. J Phys Chem B 116(49):14487-14493.
38. Sergeev A, et al (2015) Origin of order in bionanostructures. RSC Adv 5(78): 63521-63527.