“I was tired of all the sticking and poking”: Identifying barriers to diabetes self- care among low- income pregnant women

Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 926-940

  Yee, Lynn M ^b   McGuire, Jamie M ^b   Taylor, Shaneah M ^a   Niznik, Charlotte M ^a   Simon, Melissa A ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Barriers to care; Diabetes; Low income; Patient self management; Pregnancy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DIABETES MELLITUS; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MINORITY GROUP; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SELF CARE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNITED STATES; VULNERABLE POPULATION;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MINORITY GROUPS; POVERTY; PREGNANCY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SELF CARE; UNITED STATES; VULNERABLE POPULATIONS;

EID: 84940387034     PISSN: 10492089     EISSN: 15486869     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2015.0073     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Pregestational diabetes mellitus, ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 60. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;105(3):675-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006250-200503000-00049 PMid:15738045
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Gestational diabetes mellitus, ACOG Practice Bulleton No. 137. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Aug;122(2 Pt 1):406-16. PMid:23969827
3. Sweller J. Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction 1994;4:295-312. Available at: http://teaching.software-carpentry.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/sweller-cognitive-load-theory.pdf. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
4. Wilson EAH, Wolf MS. Working memory and the design of health materials: A cognitive factors perspective. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Mar;74(3):318-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.005 PMid:19121915
5. Khawaja MA, Chen F, Marcus N. Analysis of collaborative communication for linguistic cues of cognitive load. Hum Factors. 2012 Aug;54(4):518-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720811431258 PMid:22908676
6. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci. 1988;12:257-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
7. van Merrienboer JG, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):85-93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03498.x PMid:20078759
8. Nagamatsu LS, Voss M, Neider MB, et al. Increased cognitive load leads to impaired mobility decisions in seniors at risk for falls. Psychol Aging. 2011 Jun;26(2):253-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0022929 PMid:21463063 PMCid:PMC3123036
9. Burgess DJ. Are providers more likely to contribute to healthcare disparities under high levels of cognitive load? How features of the healthcare setting may lead to biases in medical decision making. Med Decis Making. 2010 Mar-Apr;30(2):246-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X09341751 PMid:19726783 PMCid:PMC3988900
10. Bandura A. Self- efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 PMid:847061
11. Anderson R, Funnell M, Fitzgerald J, et al. The Diabetes Empowerment Scale: a measure of psychosocial self- efficacy. Diabetes Care. 2000 Jun;23(6):739-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.6.739 PMid:10840988
12. Carolan M, Gill G, Steele C. Women’s experiences of factors that facilitate or inhibit gestational diabetes self- management. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2012 Sep 18;12:99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-99 PMid:22988897 PMCid:PMC3561108
13. Carolan M. Women’s experiences of gestational diabetes self- management: a qualitative study. Midwifery. 2013 Jun;29(6):637-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2012.05.013 PMid:22877761
14. Devsam BU, Bogossian FE, Peacock AS. An interpretative review of women’s experiences of gestational diabetes mellitus: Proposing a framework to enhance midwifery assessment. Women Birth. 2013 Jun;26(2):e69-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2012.12.003 PMid:23333029
15. Nielsen KK, Kapur A, Damm P, et al. From screening to postpartum follow-up: the determinants and barriers for gestational diabetes (GDM) services, a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 22;14:41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-41 PMid:24450389 PMCid:PMC3901889
16. Ulin P, Robinson E, Tolley E. Qualitative methods in public health: a field guide for applied research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey- Bass, 2005.
17. Makoul G, Clayman ML. An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Mar;60(3):301-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2005.06.010 PMid:16051459
18. Clayman ML, Makoul G, Harper MM, et al. Development of a shared decision making coding system for analysis of patient- healthcare provider encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Sep;88(3):367-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.011 PMid:22784391 PMCid:PMC3417351
19. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967. PMCid:PMC224645
20. Bryant A, Fernandez- Lamoth A, Kuppermann M. Attitudes toward birth spacing among low- income, postpartum women: a qualitative analysis. Matern Child Health J. 2012 Oct;16(7):1440-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10995-011-0911-9 PMid:22057657
21. Rosenstock I, Strecher V, Becker M. Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q. 1988 Summer;15(2):175-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109019818801500203 PMid:3378902
22. Collier SA, Mulholland C, Williams J, et al. A qualitative study of perceived barriers to management of diabetes among women with a history of diabetes during pregnancy. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Sep;20(9):1333-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2010.2676 PMid:21740191
23. Nolan JA, McCrone S, Azulay IR. The maternal experience of having diabetes in pregnancy. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011 Nov;23(11):611-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2011.00646.x PMid:22023233
24. Berg M, Honkasalo M. Pregnancy and diabetes—a hermeneutic phenomenological study of women’s experiences. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2000 Mar;21(1):39-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/01674820009075607 PMid:10907214
25. Evans MK, O’Brien B. Gestational diabetes: the meaning of an at-risk pregnancy. Qual Health Res. 2005 Jan;15(1):66-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732304270825 PMid:15574716
26. Kim C, Sinco B, Kieffer EA. Racial and ethnic variation in access to health care, provision of health care services, and ratings of health among women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2007 Jun;30(6):1459-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc06-2523 PMid:17363750
27. Lawrence JM, Andrade SM, Avalos LA, et al. Prevalence, trends, and patterns of use of antidiabetic medications among pregnant women, 2001-2007. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;121(1):106-14. PMid:23262934
28. Hunt KJ, Schuller KL. The increasing prevalence of diabetes in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Ame. 2007;34:173-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2007.03.002 PMid:17572266