Practical issues in implementing the stakeholder view as a core competence

Advances in Applied Business Strategy

Volumn 9, Issue , 2005, Pages 217-233

  Ruhli, Edwin ^a   Sachs, Sybille ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940386209     PISSN: 07496826     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0749-6826(05)09011-6     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. Barney, J. B. (2002). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2. Burgelman, R. A. (1996). A process model of strategic business exit: Implications for an evolutionary perspective on strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 17(special issue), 193-214.
3. Carroll, A. B. (1996). Business and society - ethics and stakeholder management (3rd ed.). Cinncinati, OH: South-Western Publishing Co.
4. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation - concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
5. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
6. Elkington, J. (1998). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century Business. Stony Creek, CT: New Society Publishers.
7. Frederick, W. C., Post, J. E., & Davis, K. (1992). Business and society: Corporate strategy, public policy, ethics (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
8. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management - A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
9. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191-205.
10. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). Contrib Title: The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
11. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue Winter), 109-122.
12. Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders social responsibility and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479-485.
13. Heene, A., & Sanchez, R. (1997). Competence-based strategic management. Chichester: Wiley.
14. Jones, T. M., Wicks, A. C., & Freeman, R. E. (2002). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. In: N. E. Bowie (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to business ethics (pp. 19-37). Oxford: Blackwell.
15. Kochan, T., & Rubinstein, S. (2000). Toward a stakeholder theory of the firm: The Saturn partnership. Organization Science, 11(4), 367-386.
16. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2001). Misery loves companies: Wither social initiatives by Business? Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Washington.
17. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis - an expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
19. Mowat, D. (2002). The VanCity difference: A case for the triple bottom line approach to business. International Journal of Corporate Sustainability, 9(1), 24-29.
20. Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of "triple bottom line". Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243-262.
21. Philips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
22. Post, J. E., Lawrence, A. T., & Weber, J. (2002). Business and society: Corporate strategy, public policy, ethics (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
23. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002a). Redefining the corporation: Stakeholder management and organizational wealth. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
24. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002b). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45(1), 6-28.
25. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties - A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887-910.
26. Sanchez, R., & Heene, A. (2004). The new strategic management: Organization, competition, and competence. Chichester: Wiley.
27. Sanchez, R., Heene, A., & Thomas, H. (1996). Introduction - towards the theory and practice in the new strategic management. In: R. Sanchez, A. Heene & H. Thomas (Eds), Dynamics of competence-based competition (pp. 1-35). Oxford: Elsevier Science.
28. Shell (1999). The Shell report 1999: People, planet and profits.
29. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. Handbook of qualitative research, 273-285.
30. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
31. Waddock, S., & Bodwell, C. (2002). From TQM to TRM: Emerging responsibility management approaches. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, Autumn, 2002(7), 113-126.
32. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance - financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303-319.
33. Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758-769.
34. Willard, B. (2002). The sustainability advantage: Seven business case benefits of a triple bottom line. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
35. Yin, R. K. (1993). Applications of case study research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
36. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research - design and methods (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.