Going Beyond the False Dichotomy of Broad or Specific Consent: A Meta-Perspective on Participant Choice in Research Using Human Tissue

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 44-46

  Ploug, Thomas ^a   Holm, Søren ^a,b,c  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; RESEARCH;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; RESEARCH;

EID: 84940110232     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2015.1062178     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. K.B.Brothers,, D.R.Morrison, and E.W.Clayton. 2011. Two large-scale surveys on community attitudes toward an Opt-out Biobank. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 155(12): 2982–90. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.34304.
2. D.T.Chen,, D.L.Rosenstein, P.Muthappan, et al. 2005. Research with stored biological samples: What do research participants want? Archives of Internal Medicine 165(6): 652–55. doi:10.1001/archinte.165.6.652.
3. G.Gaskell,, H.Gottweis, J.Starkbaum, et al. 2013. Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation. European Journal of Human Genetics 21(1): 14–20. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2012.104.
4. C.Grady,, L.Eckstein, B.Berkman, et al. 2015. Broad consent for research with biological samples: Workshop conclusions. American Journal of Bioethics 15(9): 34–42.
5. Å.Kettis-Lindblad, Åsa, L.RingLena, E.ViberthEva, and M.G.HanssonMats G. 2006. Genetic research and donation of tissue samples to biobanks. What do potential sample donors in the Swedish general public think? European Journal of Public Health 16(4): 433–40. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cki198.
6. T.Ploug,, and S.Holm. 2015. Meta consent: A flexible and autonomous way of obtaining informed consent for secondary research. British Medical Journal 350(May): h2146. doi:10.1136/bmj.h2146.
7. C.M.Simon,, J.L'Heureux, J.C.Murray, et al. 2011. Active choice but not too active: Public perspectives on biobank consent models. Genetics in Medicine 13(9): 821–31. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e31821d2f88.
8. B.Stegmayr,, and K.Asplund. 2002. Informed consent for genetic research on blood stored for more than a decade: A population based study. British Medical Journal 325(7365): 634–35. doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7365.634.
9. S.Treweek,, A.Doney, and D.Leiman. 2009. Public attitudes to the storage of blood left over from routine general practice tests and its use in research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 14(1): 13–19. doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2008.008016.
10. A.Tupasela,, S.Sihvo, K.Snell, P.A.Jallinoja, A.R.Aro, and E.Hemminki. 2010. Attitudes towards biomedical use of tissue sample collections, consent, and biobanks among Finns. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 38(1): 46–52. doi:10.1177/1403494809353824.