Meta consent: A flexible and autonomous way of obtaining informed consent for secondary research

BMJ (Online)

Volumn 350, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Ploug, Thomas ^a   Holm, Søren ^b  

^a AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTICLE; BLANKET CONSENT; BLANKET REFUSAL; BROAD CONSENT; DATA COLLECTION METHOD; DYNAMIC CONSENT; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; META CONSENT; PATIENT INFORMATION; PERSONAL AUTONOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; ETHICS; METHODOLOGY; PROCEDURES; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84930617033     PISSN: 09598146     EISSN: 17561833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h2146     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Gymrek M, McGuire AL, Golan D, Halperin E, Erlich Y. Identifying personal genomes by surname inference. Science 2013;339:321-4.
2. Narayanan A, Shmatikov V. Myths and fallacies of 'personally identifiable information." Commun ACM 2010;53:24-6.
3. Tassé AM, Budin-Ljøsne I, Knoppers BM, Harris JR. Retrospective access to data: the ENGAGE consent experience. Eur J Hum Genet 2010;18:741-5.
4. Information Commisioner's Office. Big data and data protection. 2014. https://ico.org.uk/media/for-organisations/documents/1541/big-data-and-data-protection.pdf.
5. Committee on the Learning Health Care System in America. Institute of Medicine. Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America. 10 May 2013. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK207225/.
6. Hansson MG, Dillner J, Bartram CR, Carlson JA, Helgesson G. Should donors be allowed to give broad consent to future biobank research? Lancet Oncol 2006;7:266-9.
7. Otlowski MFA. Developing an appropriate consent model for biobanks: in defence of 'broad" consent. In: Kaye J, Stranger M, eds. Principles and practice in biobank governance. Ashgate Publishing, 2009: 79-92.
8. Helgesson G. In defense of broad consent. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2012;21:40-50.
9. Arnason V. Coding and consent: moral challenges of the database project in Iceland. Bioethics 2004;18:27-49.
10. Hofmann B. Broadening consent-and diluting ethics? J Med Ethics 2009;35:125-9.
11. Hofmann B, Solbakk JH, Holm S. Consent to biobank research: one size fits all? In: Solbakk DJH, Holm DS, Hofmann DB, eds. The ethics of research biobanking. Springer US; 2009: 3-23.
12. Karlsen JR, Solbakk JH, Holm S. Ethical endgames: broad consent for narrow interests; open consent for closed minds. Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2011;20:572-83.
13. Kaye J, Curren L, Anderson N, et al. From patients to partners: participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research. Nat Rev Genet 2012;13:371-6.
14. Steinsbekk KS, Kåre Myskja B, Solberg B. Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem? Eur J Hum Genet 2013;21:897-902.
15. Kanelloupoulou NK, Kaye J, Whitley E, Creese S, Lund D, Hughes K. Dynamic consent-a solution to a perennial problem [electronic response to Sheehan M. Broad consent is informed consent]. BMJ 2011. www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d6900/rapid-responses.
16. Kaye J, Whitley EA, Lund D, Morrison M, Teare H, Melham K. Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks. Eur J Hum Genet 2015;23:141-6.
17. Kho ME, Duffett M, Willison DJ, Cook DJ, Brouwers MC. Written informed consent and selection bias in observational studies using medical records: systematic review. BMJ 2009;338:b866.
18. Ploug T, Holm S. Informed consent and routinisation. J Med Ethics 2013;39:214-8.
19. Ploug T, Holm S. Agreeing in ignorance: mapping the routinisation of consent in ICT-services. Sci Eng Ethics 2014;20:1097-110.
20. Ploug T, Holm S. Routinisation of informed consent in online health care systems. Int J Med Inform 2015;84:229-36.
21. Holm S, Madsen SM. Informed consent in medical research-a procedure stretched beyond breaking point. In: Corrigan O, McMillan J, Liddell K, eds. The limits of consent. Oxford University Press, 2009: 11-24.