Threats of using gamification for motivating web page quality evaluation

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 2014-June, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Juźwin, Marta ^a   Adamska, Paulina ^a   Rafalak, Maria ^a   Balcerzak, Bartłomiej ^a   Kąkol, Michał ^a   Wierzbicki, Adam ^a  

^a POLISH JAPANESE INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

Gamification methods; Online communities; Web credibility

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; GAMIFICATION; WEB SERVICES; WEBSITES;

COMMERCIAL WEBSITES; EVALUATION METHODS; GAMES WITH A PURPOSE; ON-LINE COMMUNITIES; ONLINE BEHAVIOR; QUALITY OF FEEDBACKS; UNINTENDED BEHAVIOR; WEB CREDIBILITY;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84940100271     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2643572.2643587     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. Anderson, A., Huttenlocher, D., Kleinberg, J. and Leskovec, J. Steering user behavior with badges. In Proc. WWW 2013, 95-106.
2. Dellarocas C. and Wood C. A. The sound of silence in online feedback: Estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Management Science 54, 3(2008), 460-476.
3. Eckel B. Thinking in Java, 4/e. Pearson Education, Inc. 2006.
4. Flanagin, A. J., Metzger M. J. The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media & Society 9, 2(2007), 319-342.
5. Fogg, B. J. Prominence-interpretation theory: explaining how people assess credibility online. In Proc. CHI 2003, ACM Press (2003), 722-723.
6. Fogg B. J. and Tseng, H. The elements of computer credibility. In Proc. CHI 1999, ACM Press (1999), 80-87.
7. Friedman B. J. and Kahn P. H. Jr. Human values, ethics, and design. In The human-computer interaction handbook, L. Erlbaum Associates Inc., USA, 2002, 1177-1201.
8. Ipeirotis P. G. and Gabrilovich G. Quizz: Targeted Crowdsourcing with a Billion (Potential) Users. In Proc. WWW 2014, 143-154.
9. Kąkol M., Jankowski-Lorek M., Abramczuk K., Wierzbicki A. and Catasta M. On the subjectivity and bias of web content credibility evaluations. In Proc. WWW 2013, 1131-1136.
10. l0. Kostakos V. Is the crowd's wisdom biased? A quantitative analysis of three online communities. In Proc. CSE 2009, IEEE Press (2009), 251-255.
11. ll. Morzy M. and Wierzbicki, A. The sound of silence: Mining implicit feedbacks to compute reputation. Internet and Network Economics, Springer (2006), 365-376.
12. Naeemah C. Trust me! Wikipedia's credibility among college students. International Journal of Instructional Media 38, 1(2011), 27-36
13. Rafalak, M., Abramczuk, K. and Wierzbicki, A. Incredible: Is (Almost) All Web Content Trustworthy? Analysis of psychological factors related to website credibility evaluation. In Proc. WWW 2014, 1117-1122.
14. Shen, X. L., Cheung C. M. K. and Lee M. K. O. What leads students to adopt information from Wikipedia? An empirical investigation into the role of trust and information usefulness. British Journal of Educational Technology 44, 3(2012), 502-517.