Trends, Fads and ART!

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 489-493

  Dale, Brian ^a   Menezo, Yves ^b   Coppola, Gianfranco ^a  

^a Centre for Assisted Fertilization   (Italy)

^b London Fertility Associates   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Embryo selection; Fads; IVF; Trends

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; MALE; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES;

CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREGNANCY; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC;

EID: 84939973748     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: 15737330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-014-0420-z     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG. Birth after the re-implantation of a human embryo. Lancet. 1978;2:366–7.
2. Tarin JJ, Garcia-Perez MA, Cano A. Assisted reproductive technology results: why are live birth percentages so low. Mol Reprod Develop. 2014;81:568–83.
3. Patrizio P, Sakkas D. From oocyte to baby: a clinical evaluation of the biological efficiency of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:1061–6.
4. Dale B, Wilding M, Coppola G, Tosti E. How do spermatozoa activate oocytes? Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;21:1–3.
5. Delage Y. Etudes experimentales chez les echinoderms. Arch Zool Exp Gen. 1901;9:285–326.
6. Elder K, Dale B. In vitro fertilization. 3rd ed. UK: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
7. Dale B. Fertilization in animals. London: Edward Arnold; 1983.
8. Lange K, Gartzke J. F.actin based calcium signalling. A critical comparison with the current concept of Ca signalling. J Cell Physiol. 2006;209:270–87.
9. Wilding M, Dale B, Marino M, Di Matteo L, Alviggi G, De Placido G. Mitochondrial aggregation patterns and activity in human oocytes and pre-implantation embryos. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:909–17.
10. Wilding M, Coppola GF, De Icco F, Arenare L, DiMatteo L, Dale B. Maternal non-mendelian inheritance of a reduced lifespan. J Assit Reprod Gen. 2014;31:637–43.
11. Hamatani T, Falco G, Carter MG, et al. Age-associated alteration of gene expression patterns in mouse oocytes. Hum Mol Gen. 2004;13:2263–78.
12. Ménézo YJ. Paternal and maternal factors in preimplantation embryogenesis: interaction with the biochemical environment. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:616–21.
13. Dale B, De Felice LJ, Ehrenstein G. Injection of a soluble sperm fraction into sea urchin eggs triggers the cortical reaction. Experientia. 1985;41:1068–70.
14. Kashir J, Heindryckx B, Jones C, DeSutter P, Parrington J, Coward K. Oocyte activation, phospholipase Czeta and human infertility. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:690–703.
15. Tosti A, Dale B. Lithium and phorbol ester modify the activating capacity of ascidian spermatozoa. Experientia. 1992;48:57–60.
16. Dozortsev D, Qian C, Ermilov A, Rybouchkin A, De Sutter P, Dhont M. Sperm-associated oocyte-activating factor is released from the spermatozoon within 30 minutes after injection as a result of the sperm-oocyte interaction. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2792–6.
17. Eid LN, Lorton SP, Parrish JJ. Paternal influence on S-phase in the first cell cycle of the bovine embryo. Biol Reprod. 1994;51:1232–7.
18. Ward F, Rizos D, Corridan D, Quinn K, Boland M, Lonergan P. Paternal influence on the time of first embryonic cleavage post insemination and the implications for subsequent bovine embryo development in vitro and fertility in vivo. Mol Reprod Dev. 2001;60:47–55.
19. Ménézo Y, Dale B. Paternal contribution to successful embryogenesis. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:1326–8.
20. Chun J, Limatola N, Vasilev F, Santella L. Early events of fertilization in sea urchin eggs are senditive to actin binding organic molecules. Biochem Biophs Res Comm. 2014. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.06.057.
21. Sutovsky P, Terada Y, Schatten G. Ubiquitin-based sperm assay for the diagnosis of male factor infertility. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:250–8.
22. Betts DH, Madan P. Permanent embryo arrest: molecular and cellular concepts. Mol Hum Reprod. 2008;14:445–53.
23. Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400, 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1768–74.
24. Munne S, Ary J, Zouves C, Escudero T, Barnes F, Cinioglu C, et al. Wide range of chromosome abnormalities in the embryos of young donor eggs. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:340–6.
25. Fragouli E, Alfarwati S, Spath K, Jaroudi S, Sarasa J, Enciso M, et al. The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy. Hum Gen. 2013;132:1001–13.
26. Mersereau JE, Plunkett BA, Cedars MI. Pre-implantation genetic screening in older women: a cost effectiveness analysis. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:592–8.
27. Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, Van der Veen F, Repping S. Pre-implantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTS. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17:454–66.
28. Mastenbroek S, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: back to the future. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1846–50.
29. Levin I, Almog B, Schwartz T, Gold V, Ben Yosef D, Shaubi M, et al. Effects of laser polar-body biopsy on embryo quality. Fert Steril. 2012;97:1085–8.
30. De Vos A, Staesson C, De Rycke M, Verpoest W, Haentjens P, Devroey P, et al. Impact of cleavage stage embryo biopsy on human blastocyst implantation. A prospective cohort of single embryo transfers. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2988–96.
31. Vanneste E, Voet T, Melotte C, Debrock S, Sermon K, Staesson C, et al. What next for pre-implantation genetic screening. High mitotic chromosome instability rate provides the biological basis for the low success rate. Hum Reprod. 2009;24:2679–82.
32. King WA, Coppola G, Alexander B, Mastromonaco G, Perrault S, Nini-soto MI, et al. The impact of chromosomal alteration on embryo development. Theriogeneology. 2006;65:166–77.
33. Kirkegaard K, Kesmodel US, Hindkjaer JJ, Ingerslev HJ. Time lapse parameters as predictors of blastocyst development and pregnancy outcome in embryos from good prognosis patients: a prospective co-hort. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2643–51.
34. Kirkegaard K, Cambell A, Agerholm I, Bentin Ley U, Gabrielson A, Kirk J, et al. Limitations of a time lapse blastocyt prediction model: a large multicentre outcome aanlysis. Reprod Med Online. 2014;29:156–8.
35. Stecher A, Vanderzwalmen P, Zintz M, Wirleitner B, Schuff M, Spitzer D, et al. Transfer of blastcysts with deviant morphological and morphokinetic parametes at early stages of in vitro development: a case series. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014;28:424–35.
36. Albertini D. When looks are deceiving: the challenge facing embryo quality prognosticators. J Assit Reprod Genetics. 2014;31:249–50.
37. Cohen J, Gilligan A, Esposito W, Schimmel T, Dale B. Ambient air and its potential effects on conception in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1742–6.
38. Takenaka M, Horiuchi T, Yanagamachi R. Effect of light on development of mammalian embryos. PNAS. 2007;104:14289–93.
39. Schultz RM. Of light and mouse embryos: less is more. PNAS. 2007;104:14547–8.
40. Martín-Romero FJ, Miguel-Lasobras EM, Domínguez-Arroyo JA, González-Carrera E, Alvarez IS. Contribution of culture media to oxidative stress and its effect on human oocytes. Reprod Biomed Online. 2008;17:652–61.
41. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosovski A, Menezo Y, Barak Y. Real time morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome. J Androl. 2002;23:1–8.
42. Berkovitz A, Eltyes F, Ellenbogen A, Peer S, Feldberg D, Bartoov B. Does the presence of nuclear vacuoles in human sperm selected for ICSI affect pregnancy outcome? Hum Reprod. 2006;21:1787–90.
43. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosovsky A, Yagoda A, Lederman H, et al. Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fert Steril. 2003;80:1413–29.
44. Wilding M, Coppola G, Di Matteo L, Palagiano A, Fusco E, Dale B. Intracytoplasmic injection of selected spermatozoa IMSI improves outcome after assisted reproduction by deselecting physiologically poor quality spermatozoa. J Assit Reprod Genetics. 2011;28:253–62.
45. Tosti E, Menezo Y. IMSI, useful, useless or harmful. J Fert In vitro. 2012;4:1–2.
46. Palermo GD, Hu JCY, Rienzi L, Maggiulli R, Takeuchi T, et al. Thoughts on IMSI. In Biennial Review on Infertility. 2011;2:277–90.
47. Vergouw CG, Kieslinger DC, Kostelijk EH, Botros LL, Schats R, Hompes PG, et al. Day 3 embryo selection by metabolomics profiling of culture medium with near infra red spectroscopy as an adjunt to morphology: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:2304–11.
48. Ménézo Y, Elder K, Viville S. Soluble HLA-G release by the human embryo: an interesting artefact. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:763–4.
49. Roudebush WE, Wininger JD, Jones AE, Wright G, Toledo AA, Kort HI, et al. Embryonic platelet-activating factor: an indicator of embryo viability. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:1306–10.
50. Gardner DK, Lane M. Amino acids and ammonium regulate mouse embryo development in culture. Biol Reprod. 1993;48:377–8.
51. Menezo Y, Khatchadourian C, Gharib A, Hamidi J, Greenland T, Sarda N. Regulation of S-adenosyl methionine synthesis in the mouse embryo. Life Sci. 1989;44:1601–9.
52. Ménézo Y, Lichtblau I, Elder K. New insights into human pre-implantation metabolism in vivo and in vitro. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30:293–303.
53. Ménézo Y, Mares P, Cohen M, Brack M, Viville S, Elder K. Autism, imprinting and epigenetic disorders: a metabolic syndrome linked to anomalies in homocysteine recycling starting in early life. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2011;28:1143–5.
54. Anckaert E, Adriaenssens T, Romero S, Smitz J. Ammonium accumulation and use of mineral oil overlay do not alter imprinting establishment at three key imprinted genes in mouse oocytes grown and matured in a long-term follicle culture. Biol Reprod. 2009;81:666–73.
55. Ménézo YJ, Hérubel F. Mouse and bovine models for human IVF. Reprod Biomed Online. 2002;4:170–5.
56. Wang F, Kooistra M, Lee M, Liu L, Baltz JM. Mouse embryos stressed by physiological levels of osmolarity become arrested in the late 2-cell stage before entry into M phase. Biol Reprod. 2011;85:702–13.
57. El-Maarri O, Buiting K, Peery EG, Kroisel PM, Balaban B, Wagner K, et al. Maternal methylation imprints on human chromosome 15 are established during or after fertilization. Nat Genetics. 2001;27:341–4.