Primary cementless hip arthroplasty as a potential risk factor for non-union after long-stem revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic femoral fractures

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 617-622

  Boesmueller, Sandra ^a   Michel, Marc ^a   Hofbauer, Marcus ^a   Platzer, Patrick ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Non union; Periprosthetic femoral fracture; Pseudarthrosis; Revision arthroplasty; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; FEMALE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FRACTURES, UNUNITED; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REOPERATION; RISK FACTOR; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FRACTURES, UNUNITED; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REOPERATION; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84939895067     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-014-2489-5     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Berry DJ (1999) Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthop Clin N Am 30:183–190
2. Mont MA, Maar DC, Krackow KA, Hungerford DS (1992) Hoop-stress fractures of the proximal femur during hip arthroplasty. Management and results in 19 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol 74:257–260
3. Berry DJ (2002) Management of periprosthetic fractures: the hip. J Arthroplasty 17:11–13
4. Meek RMD, Norwood T, Smith R, Brenkel IJ, Howie CR (2011) The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93:96–101
5. Foster AP, Thompson NW, Wong J, Charlwood AP (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures–a comparison between cemented and uncemented hemiarthroplasties. Injury 36:424–429
6. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 20:857–865
7. Tsiridis E, Haddad FS, Gie GA (2003) The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures around hip replacements. Injury 34:95–105
8. Beals RK, Tower SS (1996) Periprosthetic fractures of the femur. An analysis of 93 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 327:238–246
9. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Odén A, Garellick G (2006) Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br Vol 88:26–30
10. Zuurmond RG, van Wijhe W, van Raay JJAM, Bulstra SK (2010) High incidence of complications and poor clinical outcome in the operative treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures: an analysis of 71 cases. Injury 41:629–633
11. O’Shea K, Quinlan JF, Kutty S, Mulcahy D, Brady OH (2005) The use of uncemented extensively porous-coated femoral components in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1617–1621
12. Holley K, Zelken J, Padgett D, Chimento G, Yun A, Buly R (2007) Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after hip arthroplasty: an analysis of 99 patients. HSS J 3:190–197
13. Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304
14. Lenz M, Perren SM, Richards RG, Mückley T, Hofmann GO, Gueorguiev B, Windolf M (2013) Biomechanical performance of different cable and wire cerclage configurations. Int Orthop 37(1):125–130. doi:10.1007/s00264-012-1702-7
15. Perren SM, Fernandez Dell’Oca A, Lenz M, Windolf M (2011) Cerclage, evolution and potential of a Cinderella technology. An overview with reference to periprosthetic fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 78(3):190–199
16. Klein GR, Parvizi J, Rapuri V, Wolf CF, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Purtill JJ (2005) Proximal femoral replacement for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1777–1781
17. Langenhan R, Trobisch P, Ricart P, Probst A (2012) Aggressive surgical treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures can reduce mortality: comparison of open reduction and internal fixation versus a modular prosthesis nail. J Orthop Trauma 26:80–85
18. Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regnér H, Herberts P, Malchau H (2006) Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1215–1222
19. Mukundan C, Rayan F, Kheir E, Macdonald D (2010) Management of late periprosthetic femur fractures: a retrospective cohort of 72 patients. Int Orthop 34:485–489
20. Probst A, Schneider T, Hankemeier S, Brug E (2003) The prosthesis nail — a new stable fixation device for periprosthetic fractures and critical fractures of the proximal femur. Unfallchirurg 106:722–731
21. Kessler SB, Hallfeldt KK, Perren SM, Schweiberer L (1986) The effects of reaming and intramedullary nailing on fracture healing. Clin Orthop Relat Res 212:18–25
22. Webb LX, Winquist RA, Hansen ST (1986) Intramedullary nailing and reaming for delayed union or nonunion of the femoral shaft. A report of 105 consecutive cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res 212:133–141
23. Society COT (2003) Nonunion following intramedullary nailing of the femur with and without reaming. Results of a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(11):2093–2096
24. Duan X, Li T, Mohammed AQ, Xiang Z (2011) Reamed intramedullary nailing versus unreamed intramedullary nailing for shaft fracture of femur: a systematic literature review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(10):1445–1452. doi:10.1007/s00402-011-1311-8
25. Forster MC, Aster AS, Ahmed S (2005) Reaming during anterograde femoral nailing: is it worth it? Injury 36(3):445–449, Review
26. Bong MR, Kummer FJ, Koval KJ, Egol KA (2007) Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity: biomechanics and biology. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 15(2):97–106, Review
27. Fitzgerald RH, Brindley GW, Kavanagh BF (1988) The uncemented total hip arthroplasty. Intraoperative femoral fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 235:61–66
28. Schwartz JT, Mayer JG, Engh CA (1989) Femoral fracture during non-cemented total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:1135–1142
29. Laurer HL, Wutzler S, Possner S, Geiger EV, El Saman A, Marzi I, Frank J (2011) Outcome after operative treatment of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures: open reduction and internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:983–989
30. Müller M, Kääb M, Tohtz S, Haas NP, Perka C (2009) Periprosthetic femoral fractures: outcome after treatment with LISS internal fixation or stem replacement in 36 patients. Acta Orthop Belg 75:776–783
31. Pavlou G, Panteliadis P, Macdonald D, Timperley JA, Gie G, Bancroft G, Tsiridis E (2011) A review of 202 periprosthetic fractures—stem revision and allograft improves outcome for type B fractures. Hip Int 21:21–29
32. Rayan F, Konan S, Haddad FS (2010) Uncemented revision hip arthroplasty in B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures—A prospective analysis. Hip Int 20:38–42
33. Fink B, Grossmann A, Singer J (2012) Hip revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic fractures of Vancouver type B2 and B3. J Orthop Trauma 26:206–211
34. Manolagas SC, Parfitt AM (2010) What old means to bone. Trends Endocrinol Metab 21:369–374
35. van Wunnik BPW, Weijers PHE, van Helden SH, Brink PRG, Poeze M (2011) Osteoporosis is not a risk factor for the development of nonunion: A cohort nested case-control study. Injury 42:1491–1494
36. Pressmar J, Macholz F, Merkert W, Gebhard F, Liener UC (2010) Results and complications in the treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures with a locked plate system. Unfallchirurg 113:195–202