Biomechanical performance of different cable and wire cerclage configurations

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 125-130

  Lenz, Mark ^a   Perren, Stephan Marcel ^a   Richards, Robert Geoff ^a   Mückley, Thomas ^b   Hofmann, Gunther Olaf ^b   Gueorguiev, Boyko ^a   Windolf, Markus ^a  

^a AO RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Switzerland)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BRAIDED WIRE CERCLAGE; CABLE CERCLAGE CONFIGURATION; CERCLAGE PRETENSION LOSS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOUBLE LOOPED CABLE CERCLAGE; DOUBLE LOOPED WIRE CERCLAGE; FEMUR SHAFT; FIXATION STABILITY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; LOAD AT TOTAL CERCLAGE FAILURE; LOAD LEADING TO PLASTIC DEFORMATION ONSET; LOADING TEST; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; ONE SINGLE LOOPED CABLE CERCLAGE; ORTHOPEDIC CERCLAGE APPLIER; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE LOOPED CABLE CERCLAGE; SINGLE LOOPED WIRE CERCLAGE; TWO SINGLE LOOPED CABLE CERCLAGE; WIRE CERCLAGE CONFIGURATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE WIRES; CADAVER; FEMUR; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTERNAL; HUMANS; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; STRESS, MECHANICAL;

EID: 84871920381     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1702-7     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Perren SM, Fernandez Dell'Oca A, Lenz M, Windolf M (2011) Cerclage, evolution and potential of a Cinderella technology. An overview with reference to periprosthetic fractures. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 78(3):190-199
2. Bostrom MP, Asnis SE, Ernberg JJ, Wright TM, Giddings VL, Berberian WS, Missri AA (1994) Fatigue testing of cerclage stainless steel wire fixation. J Orthop Trauma 8(5):422-428
3. Carls J, Kohn D, Rossig S (1999) A comparative study of two cerclage systems. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119(1-2):67-72 (Pubitemid 29134617)
4. Wähnert D, Lenz M, Schlegel U, Perren S, Windolf M (2011) Cerclage handling for improved fracture treatment. A biomechanical study on the twisting procedure. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech 78(3):208-214
5. Dickman CA, Papadopoulos SM, Crawford NR, Brantley AG, Gealer RL (1997) Comparative mechanical properties of spinal cable and wire fixation systems. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 22(6):596-604 (Pubitemid 27147079)
6. Johnson A, Houlton J (2005) AO principles of fracture management in the dog and cat. Thieme, Stuttgart
7. Windolf M, Muths R, Braunstein V, Gueorguiev B, Hänni M, Schwieger K (2009) Quantification of cancellous bone-compaction due to DHS Blade insertion and influence upon cut-out resistance. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24(1):53-58. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.09.005
8. Blass CE, Piermattei DL, Withrow SJ, Scott RJ (1986) Static and dynamic cerclage wire analysis. Vet Surg 15(2):181-184. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1986. tb00200.x
9. Liu A, O'Connor DO, Harris WH (1997) Comparison of cerclage techniques using a hose clamp versus monofilament cerclage wire or cable. J Arthroplasty 12(7):772-776 (Pubitemid 27452610)
10. Steinberg EL, Shavit R (2011) Braided cerclage wires: a biomechanical study. Injury 42(4):347-351. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.05.022
11. Roe SC (1997) Mechanical characteristics and comparisons of cerclage wires: introduction of the double-wrap and loop/twist tying methods. Vet Surg 26(4):310-316 (Pubitemid 127737489)
12. Wagner M, Knorr-Held F, Hohmann D (1996) Measuring stability of wire cerclage in femoral fractures when performing total hip replacement. In vitro study on a standardized bone model. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 115(1):33-37 (Pubitemid 26003810)