Outcome after operative treatment of Vancouver type B1 and C periprosthetic femoral fractures: Open reduction and internal fixation versus revision arthroplasty

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 131, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 983-989

  Laurer, Helmut L ^a   Wutzler, Sebastian ^a   Possner, Susann ^a   Geiger, Emanuel V ^a   El Saman, André ^a   Marzi, Ingo ^a   Frank, Johannes ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL FRANKFURT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Complications; Hip replacement; Periprosthetic femoral fracture; Revision arthroplasty; Vancouver classification

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; FEMALE; FEMUR FRACTURE; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; OPEN REDUCTION; OSTEOSYNTHESIS; PLATE FIXATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VANCOUVER TYPE B1 PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURE; VANCOUVER TYPE C PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURE;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BONE NAILS; BONE PLATES; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FEMORAL FRACTURES; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FRACTURE FIXATION, INTERNAL; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80051671757     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: 14343916     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-011-1272-y     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Brady OH, Garbuz DS, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2000) The reli-ability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement. J Arthroplast 15(1):59-62 (Pubitemid 30053520)
2. Buttaro MA, Farfalli G, Paredes Nunez M, Comba F, Piccaluga F (2007) Locking compression plate fixation of Vancouver type-B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(9):1964-1969 (Pubitemid 350195027)
3. Chakravarthy J, Bansal R, Cooper J (2007) Locking plate oste-osynthesis for Vancouver Type B1 and Type C periprosthetic fractures offemur: a report on 12 patients. Injury 38(6):725-733 (Pubitemid 46726310)
4. Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293-304
5. Erhardt JB, Grob K, Roderer G, Hoffmann A, Forster TN, Kuster MS (2008) Treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures with the non-contact bridging plate: a new angular stable implant. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128(4):409-416 (Pubitemid 351437017)
6. Haidar SG, Goodwin MI (2005) Dynamic compression plate fixation for post-operative fractures around the tip of a hip prosthesis. Injury 36(3):417-423 (Pubitemid 40248397)
7. Kaab MJ, Stockle U, Schutz M, Stefansky J, Perka C, Haas NP (2006) Stabilisation of periprosthetic fractures with angular stable internal fixation: a report of 13 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 126(2):105-110
8. Lindahl H (2007) Epidemiology of periprosthetic femur fracture around a total hip arthroplasty. Injury 38(6):651-654 (Pubitemid 46726315)
9. Lindahl H, Garellick G, Regner H, Herberts P, Malchau H (2006) Three hundred and twenty-one periprosthetic femoral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(6):1215-1222 (Pubitemid 43837114)
10. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Peri-prosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplast 20(7):857-865 (Pubitemid 41463684)
11. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Oden A, Garellick G (2006) Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(1):26-30 (Pubitemid 43125308)
12. Masri BA, Meek RM, Duncan CP (2004) Periprosthetic fractures evaluation and treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 420:80-95 (Pubitemid 38436562)
13. Muller M, Kaab M, Tohtz S, Haas NP, Perka C (2009) Peri-prosthetic femoral fractures: outcome after treatment with LISS internal fixation or stem replacement in 36 patients. Acta Orthop Belg 75(6):776-783
14. Ninan TM, CostaML, Krikler SJ (2007) Classification offemoral periprosthetic fractures. Injury 38(6):661-668
15. Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH, Ho-zack WJ (2004) Treatment protocol for proximal femoral peri-prosthetic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2):8-16 (Pubitemid 39628342)
16. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed ''Up & Go'': a test ofbasic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39(2):142-148
17. Ricci WM, Bolhofner BR, Loftus T, Cox C, Mitchell S, Borrelli J Jr (2005) Indirect reduction and plate fixation, without grafting, for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures about a stable intra-medullary implant. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(10):2240-2245 (Pubitemid 41407549)
18. Su ET, DeWal H, Di Cesare PE (2004) Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12(1):12-20
19. Wutzler S, Laurer HL, Lehnert M, Maier B, Marzi I (2006) Versorgungsstrategien bei periprothetischen Frakturen nach Hü ftgelenkersatz. In: Effenberger H, Zichner L, Richolt J (eds) Hüftschäfte. MCU-Vertrieb, Grieskirchen, pp 292-296