Influence of a performance indicator on Danish research production and citation impact 2000–12

Scientometrics

Volumn 101, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 1325-1344

  Ingwersen, Peter ^a   Larsen, Birger ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Citation analyses; Denmark; Proceedings papers; Publication patterns; Publication performance indicator; Research articles; Review articles

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939887056     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1291-x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aagaard, K., Bloch, C., Schneider, J., Henriksen, D., Kjeldager Ryan, T., & Lauridsen, P. S. (2014). Evaluering af den norske publiceringsindikator (Eng.: Evaluation of the Norwegian publication indicator). Aarhus: Dansk center for Forskningsanalyse, Aarhus Universitet.
2. Aagaard, K., & Schneider, J. W. (2012). Den danske bibliometriske model; En dårlig kopi af den norske. Forskningspolitikk,1, 28–29.
3. Butler, L. (2003). Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Research Policy,32(1), 143–155.
4. Butler, L. (2004). What happens when funding is linked to publication counts? In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology (pp. 340–389). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
5. Butler, L., & Visser, M. S. (2006). Extending citation analysis to non-source items. Scientometrics,66(10), 327–343.
6. Debackere, K., & Glänzel, W. (2004). Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key. Scientometrics,59, 253–276.
7. Engels, T. C. E., Ossenblok, T. L. B., & Spruyt, E. H. J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009. Scientometrics,93, 373–390.
8. Forskningsstyrelsen. (2013). The Danish Research & Innovation Agency. (in Danish) available at: http://www.fi.dk/viden-og-politik/tal-og-analyser/den-bibliometriske-forskningsindikator.
9. Glänzel, W. (2002). Co-authorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980–1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends,50(3), 461–473.
10. He, Y., & Guan, J. C. (2008). Contribution of Chinese publications in computer science: A case study on LNCS. Scientometrics,75(28), 519–534.
11. Ingwersen, P., & Larsen, B. (2013). Influence of university mergers and the Norwegian performance indicator on overall Danish citation impact 2000-12. Proceedings of the International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics, Wien, August 2013.Vol 1, 16 p. Available in: http://issi2013.org/Images/ISSI_Proceedings_Volume_I.pdf.
12. Ingwersen, P., Larsen, B., Garcia-Zorita, J.C., Serrano-López, E.A., & Sanz-Casado, E. (2014). Influence of Proceedings Papers on Citation Impact in Seven Sub-fields of Sustainable Energy Research 2005-2011. Scientometrics (under review).
13. Luo, J. Y., Flynn, J. M., Solnick, R. E., Ecklund, E. H., & Matthews, K. R. W. (2011). International stem cell collaboration: How disparate policies between the United States and the United Kingdom impact research. Plos One,6(3), 1–7.
14. Martins, W. S., Goncalves, M. A., Laender, A. H. F., & Ziviani, N. (2010). Assessing the quality of scientific conferences based on bibliographic citations. Scientometrics,83(19), 133–155.
15. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
16. Narin, F., Stevens, K., & Whitlow, E. S. (1991). Scientific cooperation in Europe and the citation of multinationally authored papers. Scientometrics,21(3), 313–323.
17. Ossenblok, T. L. B., Engels, T. C. E., & Sivertsen, G. (2012). The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science. A comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005–2009). Research Evaluation,21(4), 280–290.
18. Schneider, J. W. (2009). An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performance-based funding of research institutions in Norway. European Political Science,8(3), 364–378.
19. Sivertsen, G. (2010). A performance indicator based on complete data for the scientific publication output at research institutions. ISSI Newsletter,6(19), 22–28.
20. Sivertsen, G., & Schneider J. W. (2012). Evaluering av den bibliometriske forskningsindikator. Oslo: NIFU. 75 p. (Rapport 17/2012, in Norwegian).
21. van Raan, A. F. J. (1999). Advanced bibliometric methods for evaluation of universities. Scientometrics,45(3), 417–423.
22. van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics,62(1), 133–143.
23. http://www.forskeren.dk. Visited 22 Apr 2013.
24. http://professorvaelde.blogspot.com. Visited 22 Apr 2013.
25. Wainer, J., de Oliveira, H. P., & Anido, R. (2011). Patterns of bibliographic references in the ACM published papers. Information Processing & Management,47(13), 135–142.
26. Thomson-Reuters. ISI. http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/multidicplinary/webodscience/cpci/.