Influence of university mergers and the Norwegian performance indicator on overall Danish citation impact 2000-12

Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 1003-1018

  Ingwersen, Peter ^a,b   Larsen, Birger ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CITATION IMPACT; DATA COLLECTION; PAPER ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; PERFORMANCE MODEL; POINT-BASED; RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY; WEB OF SCIENCE;

BENCHMARKING; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS; PRODUCTIVITY; PUBLISHING; TECHNICAL WRITING;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84896850221     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Aagaard, K. & Schneider, J.W. (2012). Den danske bibliometriske model; En dårlig kopi af den norske. Forskningspolitikk, March, 2012 (1), 28-29.
2. Butler, L. (2003). Explaining Australia's increased share of ISI publications-The effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Research Policy, 32(1), 143-155.
3. Butler, L. (2004). What happens when funding is linked to publication counts? In: Moed, H.F., Glänzel, W; Schmoch, U. (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 389-340.
4. Butler, L. & Visser, M.S. (2006). Extending citation analysis to non-source items. Scientometrics, 66(10), 327-343.
5. Danmarks Statistik (2012). University administrative staff developments 2007-10. (In Danish) Available at: http://www.statistikbanken.dk/statbank5a/selectvarval/saveselections.asp
6. Debackere, K. & Glänzel, W. (2004). Using a bibliometric approach to support research policy making: The case of the Flemish BOF-key. Scientometrics, 59, 253-276.
7. Elleby, A. & Ingwersen, P. (2010). Publication point indicators: A comparative case study of two publication point systems and citation impact in an interdisciplinary context. Journal of Informetrics, 4, 512-523.
8. Engels, T.C.E., Ossenblok, T.L.B. & Spruyt, E.H. J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities, 2000-2009. Scientometrics, 93, 373-390.
9. Forskningsstyrelsen (2013); the Danish Research & Innovation Agency; (in Danish) available at: http://www.fi.dk/viden-og-politik/tal-og-analyser/denbibliometriske-forskningsindikator
10. He, Y. & Guan, J.C. (2008). Contribution of Chinese publications in computer science: A case study on LNCS. Scientometrics, 75(28), 519-534.
11. Katz, J., & Hicks, D. (1997). How much is a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40(3), 541-554.
12. Katz, J., & Martin, B. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
13. Kyvik, S. (2002). The merger of non-university colleges in Norway. Higher Education, 44(1), 53-72.
14. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer. http://www.forskeren.dk. Visited April 22, 2013. http://professorvaelde.blogspot.com. Visited April 22, 2013.
15. Ossenblok, T.L.B., Engels, T.C.E. & Sivertsen, G. (2012). The representation of the social sciences and humanities in the Web of Science. A comparison of publication patterns and incentive structures in Flanders and Norway (2005-2009). Research Evaluation, 21(4), 280-290.
16. Schneider, J. W. (2009). An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performance-based funding of research institutions in Norway. European Political Science, 8(3), 364-378.
17. Sivertsen, G. (2010). A performance indicator based on complete data for the scientific publication output at research institutions. ISSI Newsletter, 6(19), 22-28.
18. Sivertsen, G. & Schneider J.W. (2012). Evaluering av den bibliometriske forskningsindikator. Oslo: NIFU. 75 p. (Rapport 17/2012, in Norwegian)
19. van Raan, A.F.J. (1999). Advanced bibliometric methods for evaluation of universities. Scientometrics, 45(3), 417-423.
20. van Raan, A.F.J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133-143.
21. Wainer, J., de Oliveira, H.P. & Anido, R. (2011). Patterns of bibliographic references in the ACM published papers. Information Processing & Management, 47(13), 135-142.