Views on alternative forums for effectively tackling climate change

Nature Climate Change

Volumn 5, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 864-867

  Hjerpe, Mattias ^a   Nasiritousi, Naghmeh ^a  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GEOGRAPHICAL REGION; GLOBAL CLIMATE; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; POLICY MAKING; TWENTY FIRST CENTURY; UNITED NATIONS FRAMEWORK CONVENTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE;

EID: 84939839862     PISSN: 1758678X     EISSN: 17586798     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nclimate2684     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Jordan, A. et al. Going beyond two degrees?. The risks and opportunities of alternative options. Clim. Policy 13, 751-769 (2013
2. Keohane, R. O. & Victor, D. G. The regime complex for climate change. Perspect. Polit. 9, 7-23 (2011
3. Bulkeley, H. et al. Transnational Climate Change Governance (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014
4. Kim, J. & Chung, S-Y. The role of the G20 in governing the climate change regime. Int. Environ. Agreements 12, 361-374 (2012
5. Weischer, L., Morgan, J. & Patel, M. Climate clubs: Can small groups of countries make a big di-erence in addressing climate change?. Rev. Eur. Community Int. Environ. Law 21, 177-192 (2014
6. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I. & McGee, J. Legitimacy in an era of fragmentation: The case of global climate governance. Glob. Environ. Polit. 13, 56-78 (2013
7. Falkner, R., Stephan, H. & Vogler, J. International climate policy after Copenhagen: Towards a building blocks' approach. Glob. Policy 1, 252-262 (2010
8. Eckersley, R. Moving forward in the climate negotiations: Multilateralism or minilateralism?. Glob. Environ. Polit. 12, 24-42 (2012
9. Naim, M. Minilateralism: The magic number to get real international action. Foreign Policy 173, 135-136 (2009
10. Grasso, M. & Roberts, T. A compromise to break the climate impasse. Nature Clim. Change 4, 543-549 (2014
11. Victor, D. Plan B for Copenhagen. Nature 461, 342-344 (2009
12. Hare, W., Stockwell, C., Flachsland, C. & Oberthür, S. The architecture of the global climate regime: A top-down perspective. Clim. Policy 10, 600-614 (2010
13. Winkler, H. & Beaumont, J. Fair and effective multilateralism in the post-Copenhagen climate negotiations. Clim. Policy 10, 638-654 (2010
14. Cole, D. H. Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Clim. Change 5, 114-118 (2015
15. Rayner, S. How to eat an elephant: A bottom-up approach to climate policy. Clim. Policy 10, 615-621 (2010
16. Dai, X. Global regime and national change. Clim. Policy 10, 622-637 (2010
17. Abbott, K.W. The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environ. Plan. C 30, 571-590 (2012
18. Zürn, M. & Faude, B. Commentary: On fragmentation, di-erentiation, and coordination. Glob. Environ. Polit. 13, 119-130 (2013
19. Bäckstrand, K. Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships. Glob. Environ. Polit. 8, 74-102 (2008
20. Biermann, F., Pattberg, P., van Asselt, H. & Zelli, F. The fragmentation of global governance achitectures: A framework for analysis. Glob. Environ. Polit. 9, 14-40 (2009
21. McGee, J. & Taplin, R. The Asia-Pacific partnership and market-liberal discourse in global climate governance. Int. J. Law Context 10, 338-356 (2014
22. Huang, J. A Leadership of Twenty (L20)Within the UNFCCC: Establishing a legitimate and effective regime to improve our climate system. Glob. Gov. 15, 435-441 (2009
23. NAZCA: Non-State Actor Zone for Climate Action (UNFCCC, accessed 12 May 2015); http://climateaction.unfccc.int
24. International Cooperative Initiatives Database (UNFCCC, accessed 12 May 2015); http://unfccc.int/focus/mitigation/items/7907.php
25. Betzold, C. Responsiveness or influence?Whom to lobby in international climate change negotiations. Int. Negot. 19, 35-61 (2014
26. Böhmelt, T., Koubi, V. & Bernauer, T. Civil society participation in global governance: Insights from climate politics. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 53, 18-36 (2014
27. Parker, C., Karlsson, C., Hjerpe, M. & Linnér, B-O. Fragmented climate change leadership: Making sense of the ambiguous outcome of COP-15. Environ. Polit. 21, 268-286 (2012
28. Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M. & Buhr, K. Pluralising climate change solutions?Views held and voiced by participants at the international climate change negotiations. Ecol. Econ. 105, 177-184 (2014
29. Linnér, B-O. & Pahuja, N. A registry for nationally appropriate mitigation actions: Goals, outcomes and institutional requisites. Ambio 41, 56-67 (2012
30. Friman, M. & Hjerpe, M. Agreement, significance, and understandings of historical responsibility in climate change negotiations. Clim. Policy 15, 302-320 (2015
31. Nasiritousi, N., Hjerpe, M. & Linnér, B-O. The roles of non-state actors in climate change governance: Understanding agency through governance profiles. Int. Environ. Agreements http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10784-014-9243-8 (2014
32. Buhr, K., Roth, S. & Stigson, P. Climate change politics through a global pledgeffand-review regime: Positions among negotiators and stakeholders. Sustainability 6, 794-811 (2014
33. Buhr, K. & Hjerpe, M. Expectations on corporate climate action under regulatory uncertainty. Int. J. Clim. Change Strateg. Manag. 4, 403-419 (2012
34. List of Participants, Conference of the Parties, Nineteenth Session (UNFCCC, accessed 12 May 2015); http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2013/cop19/eng/inf04.pdf
35. List of Participants, Conference of the Parties, Twentieth Session (UNFCCC, accessed 12 May 2015); http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2014/cop20/eng/misc01p01.pdf
36. Hjerpe, M. & Linnér, B-O. Functions of COP sideffevents in climateffchange governance. Clim. Policy 10, 167-180 (2010