Analysis of interactions between potent inhibitors of ATP sulfurylase via molecular dynamics

Molecular Simulation

Volumn 42, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 605-610

  Dos Santos, Elias Silva ^a   Gritta, Dermeval Heitor Souza ^b   De Almeida, Jailton Souza ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF BAHIA   (Brazil)

^b Instituto Federal da Educac õ   (Brazil)

Author keywords

enzyme; hydrogen sulphide; souring; sulfate reducing bacteria; synergism

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINETRIPHOSPHATE; ENZYMES; HYDROGEN SULFIDE; SOLUTIONS; SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

BUTYLATED HYDROXYTOLUENE; DYNAMIC BEHAVIOURS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; POTENT INHIBITOR; RELATIVE FREE ENERGY; SOURING; SULFATE REDUCING BACTERIA; SYNERGISM;

MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 84939818319     PISSN: 08927022     EISSN: 10290435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08927022.2015.1064914     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. dos Santos ES, de Souza LC, de Assis PN, Almeida PF, Ramos-de-Souza E. Souring control in fluid samples of oil industry using a multiple ligand Simultaneous docking (MLSD) strategy. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2014; 22: 1-9.
2. Cheng CJ, Daggett V. Molecular dynamics simulations capture the misfolding of the199 Bovine Prion Protein at acidic pH. Biomolecules. 2014; 4: 181-201.
3. Das A, Lu L, Andersen HC, Voth GA. The multiscale coarse-graining method. X. Improved algorithms for constructing coarse-grained potentials for molecular systems. J Chem Phys. 2012; 136: 194115.
4. Hamelberg D, Mongan J, McCammon JA. Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules. J Chem Phys. 2004; 120: 11919-11929.
5. Zhang BW, Jasnow D, Zuckerman DM. Efficient and verified simulation of a path ensemble for conformational change in a united-residue model of calmodulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104: 18043-18048.
6. Gangupomu VK, Wagner JR, Park In-Hee, Jain A, Vaidehi N. Mapping conformational dynamics of proteins using torsional dynamics simulations. Biophys J. 2013; 104: 1999-2008.
7. Kollman PA, Massova I, Reyes C, Kuhn B, Huo S, Chong L., et al. Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. Acc Chem Res. 2000; 33: 889-897.
8. Zwanzig RW. High-temperature equation of state by a perturbation method. I. Nonpolar gases. J Chem Phys. 1954; 22: 1420-1426.
9. Kirkwood JG. Statistical mechanics of fluid mixtures. J Chem Phys. 1935; 3: 300-313.
10. Hansson T, Marelius J, Aqvist J. Ligand binding affinity prediction by linear interaction energy methods. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 1998; 12: 27-35.
11. Wang W, Wang J, Kollman PA. What determines the van der Waals Coefficient b in the 210 LIE (Linear Interaction Energy) Method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations? Proteins: Struct Funct Genet. 1999; 34: 395-402.
12. Åqvist J, Marelius J. The linear interaction energy method for predicting ligand binding free energies. Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2001; 4: 613-626.
13. Bjelic S, Nervall M, Gutiérrez-de-Terán H, Ersmark K, Hallberg A, Aqvist J. Computational inhibitor design against malaria plasmepsins. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2007; 64: 2285-2305.
14. Wang R, Lai L, Wang S. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2002; 16: 11-26.
15. Trott O, Olson OJ. Autodock Vina: Improving speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization and multithreading. J Comput Chem. 2010; 31: 455-461.
16. van der Spoel D, Lindahl E, Hess B, van Buuren AR, Apol E, Meulenhoff PJ., et al. Gromacs user manual version 3.3. Available from www.gromacs.org 2005.
17. Oostenbrink C, Villa A, Mark AE, Van Gunsteren WF. A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: The GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6. J Comput Chem. 2004; 25: 1656-1676.
18. Canzar S, El-Kebir M, Pool R, Elbassioni K, Malde AK, Mark AE., et al. Charge group partitioning in biomolecular simulation. J Comput Biol. 2013; 20: 188-198.
19. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numeral integration of the Cartesian equation of motion of a system with constrains; molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys. 1977; 23: 327-341.
20. Miyamoto S, Kollman PA. SETTLE: an analytical version of the Shake an RATTLE algorithms for molecular simulation. J Chem. 1992; 13: 952-962.
21. Byrd RH, Lu P, Nocedal J. A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM: J Sci Stat Comput. 1995; 16: 1190-1208.
22. Valentini G, Maggi M, Pey AL. Protein stability, folding and misfolding in human PGK1 deficiency. Biomolecules. 2013; 3: 1030-1052.
23. Ozkan SB, Wu GA, Chodera JD, Dill KA. Protein folding by zipping and assembly. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007; 104: 11987-11992.
24. Taft CA, da Silva CHTP. Comments on the paper Levinthal's question, revisited, and answered. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2013; 31: 1001-1002.
25. Hlavacek WS, Posner RG, Perelson AS. Steric effects on multivalent ligand-receptor binding: exclusion of ligand sites by bound cell surface receptors. Biophys J. 1999; 76: 3031-3043.