New approaches to providing individualized diabetes care in the 21st century

Current Diabetes Reviews

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 222-230

  Powell, Priscilla W ^a   Corathers, Sarah D ^b   Raymond, Jennifer ^c   Streisand, Randi ^d  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER   (United States)

^d GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

Author keywords

Diabetes self management; Glycemic control; Multidisciplinary team care; Patient centered care; Pediatrics; Type 1 diabetes

Indexed keywords

INSULIN;

ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; CONTINUOUS INFUSION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DIABETES MELLITUS; ECONOMIC ASPECT; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HOME CARE; HUMAN; INSULIN PUMP; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCHOOL; SELF CARE; SUPPORT GROUP; TEAMWORK; ADOLESCENT; AGE; CHILD; COOPERATION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; HISTORY; INTEGRATED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MASS COMMUNICATION; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRENDS;

ADOLESCENT; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84939813512     PISSN: 15733998     EISSN: 18756417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/1573399811666150421110316     Document Type: Article

References (94)

1. [1] Hirsch IB. Insulin analogues. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 174-183.
2. [2] Yeh HC, Brown TT, Maruthur N, et al. Comparative effectiveness and safety of methods of insulin delivery and glucose monitoring for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2012; 157: 336-347.
3. [3] Blackman SM, Raghinaru D, Adi S, et al. Insulin pump use in young children in the T1D Exchange clinic registry is associated with lower hemoglobin A1c levels than injection therapy. Pediatr Diabetes 2014; 15: 564-572.
4. [4] Pihoker C, Badaru A, Anderson A, et al. Insulin regimens and clinical outcomes in a type 1 diabetes cohort: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth study. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 27-33.
5. [5] Chiang JL, Kirkman MS, Laffel LM, Peters AL. Type 1 diabetes through the life span: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 2034-2054.
6. [6] Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N England J Med 1993; 329: 977-986.
7. [7] UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet 1998; 352: 854-865.
8. [8] UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive bloodglucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 1998; 352: 837-853.
9. [9] Nambam B, DuBose SN, Nathan BM, et al. Therapeutic inertia: underdiagnosed and undertreated hypertension in children participating in the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry. Pediatr Diabetes 2014; doi: 10.1111/pedi.12231.
10. [10] Strain WD, Cos X, Hirst M, et al. Time to do more: addressing clinical inertia in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014; 105: 302-312.
11. [11] Wood J, Miller K, Maahs D, et al. Most youth with type 1 diabetes in the T1D exchange clinic registry do not meet American Diabetes Association or International Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Diabetes Clinical Guidelines. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 2035-2037.
12. [12] Hanas R, Laffel L, Domenger C, et al. Lifestyle factors associated with glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D): the global TEENs Study. Pediatr Diabetes 2014; 15 Suppl 19: 20.
13. [13] Maahs DM, Hermann JM, DuBose SN, et al. Contrasting the clinical care and outcomes of 2,622 children with type 1 diabetes less than 6 years of age in the United States T1D Exchange and German/ Austrian DPV registries. Diabetologia 2014; 57: 1578-1585.
14. [14] Haas L, Maryniuk M, Beck J, et al. National standards for diabetes self-management education and support. Diabetes Care 2014; 37 (Suppl 1): S144-153.
15. [15] Jessup RL. Interdisciplinary versus multidisciplinary care teams: do we understand the difference? Aust Health Rev 2007; 31: 330-331.
16. [16] Perfetti R. Comprehensive approach to the management of diabetes: offering improved outcomes for diabetics and the healthcare system. Diabetes Manage 2013; 3: 505-528.
17. [17] de Wit M, Pulgaron ER, Pattion-Fernandez AM, Delamater AM. Psychological support for children with diabetes: are the guidelines being met? J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2014; 21: 190-199.
18. [18] Hanberger L, Samuelsson U, Bertero C, Ludvigsson J. The influence of structure, process, and policy on HbA1c levels in treatment of children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2012; 96: 331-338.
19. [19] Wiley J, Westbrook M, Long J, Greenfield JR, Day RO, Braithwaite J. Multidisciplinary diabetes team care: the experiences of young adults with type 1 diabetes. Health Expect 2013; doi: 10.1111/hex.12170.
20. [20] Wigert H, Wikström E. Organizing person-centred care in paediatric diabetes: multidisciplinary teams, long-term relationships and adequate documentation. BMC Res Notes 2014; 7: doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-72: Available from: http://www.biomedcentral. com/content/pdf/1756-0500-7-72.pdf. Accessed 12/14/14.
21. [21] Monaghan M, Hilliard M, Sweenie R, Riekert K. Transition readiness in adolescents and emerging adults with diabetes: the role of patient-provider communication. Curr Diab Rep 2013; 13: 900-908.
22. [22] Garvey KC, Markowitz JT, Laffel LMB. Transition to adult care for youth with type 1 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2012; 12: 533-541.
23. [23] Garvey KC, Wolpert HA, Rhodes ET, et al. Health care transition in patients with type 1 diabetes: young adult experiences and relationship to glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 1716-1722.
24. [24] Vyt A. Interprofessional and transdisciplinary teamwork in healthcare. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2008; 24 (Suppl 1): S106-S109.
25. [25] Nancarrow SA, Booth A, Ariss S, Smith T, Enderby P, Roots A. Ten principles of good interdisciplinary team work. Human Resources for Health 2013; 11: doi:10.1186/1478-4491-11-19. Available from: http://www.human-resources-health.com/content/11/1/19. Accessed 3/22/15.
26. [26] Edwards-Leeper L, Spack NP. Psychological evaluation and medical treatment of transgender youth in an interdisciplinary "Gender Management Service" (GeMS) in a major pediatric center. J Homosex 2012;59:321-336.
27. [27] Collaco JM, Aherrera AD, Au Yeung KJ, Lefton-Greif MA, Hoch J, Skinner ML. Interdisciplinary pediatric aerodigestive care and reduction in health care costs and burden. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2015; 141: 101-105.
28. [28] Erskine KE, Griffith E, Degroat N, et al. An interdisciplinary approach to personalized medicine: case studies from a cardiogenetics clinic. Per Med 2013;10: 73-80.
29. [29] Carty SE, Doherty GM, Inabnet WB III, et al. American Thyroid Association statement on the essential elements of interdisciplinary communication of perioperative information for patients undergoing thyroid cancer surgery. Thyroid 2012; 22: 395-399.
30. [30] Institute of Medicine Committee on Behavioral and Social Sciences in Medical School Curricula. Improving medical education: enhancing the behavioral and social science content of medical school curricula. National Academies Press: Washington, DC 2004. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK10238/. Accessed 9/8/14.
31. [31] Mann S, Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC approves new MCAT exam with increased focus on social, behavioral sciences. Available from: https://www.aamc.org/newsroom/ reporter/march2012/276588/mcat2015.html. Accessed 9/8/14.
32. [32] Murad MH, Shah ND, Van Houten HK, et al. Individuals with diabetes preferred that future trials use patient-important outcomes and provide pragmatic inferences. J Clin Epidemiol 2011; 64: 743-748.
33. [33] Glasgow RE, Peeples M, Skovlund SE. Where is the patient in diabetes performance measures? The case for including patientcentered and self-management measures. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 1046-50.
34. [34] Inzucchi SE, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a patient-centered approach. Position statement of the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2012; 35: 1364-79.
35. [35] Marrero DG, Ard J, Delamater AM, et al. Twenty-first century behavioral medicine: a context for empowering clinicians and patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 463-470.
36. [36] Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academies Press: Washington, DC 2001.
37. [37] Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I, et al. Observational study of effect of patient centeredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ 2001; 323: 908-911.
38. [38] Stewart M, Brown JB, Donner A, et al. The impact of patientcentered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 2000; 49: 796-804.
39. [39] Croom A, Wiebe DJ, Berg CA, et al. Adolescent and parent perceptions of patient-centered communication while managing type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol 2011; 36: 206-215.
40. [40] Iannotti RJ, Schneider S, Nansel TR, et al. Self-efficacy, outcome expectations, and diabetes self-management in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2006; 27: 98-105.
41. [41] Ott J, Greening L, Palardy N, Holderby A, DeBell WK. Selfefficacy as a mediator variable for adolescents adherence to treatment for insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Child Health Care 2000; 29: 47-63.
42. [42] Berg CA, King PS, Butler JM, Pham P, Palmer D, Wiebe DJ. Parental involvement and adolescents’ diabetes management: The mediating role of self-efficacy and externalizing and internalizing behaviors. J Pediatr Psychol 2011; 36: 329-339.
43. [43] Lucian Leape Institute Roundtable on Care Integration. Order from chaos: accelerating care integration. 2012: Available from: http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.npsf.org/resource/resmgr/LLI/Order_from_Chaos_final_web.pdf. Accessed 12/14/14.
44. [44] Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med 1997; 44: 681-692.
45. [45] Barry MJ, Edgman-Levitan S. Shared decision making-the pinnacle of patient-centered care. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 780-781.
46. [46] Valenzuela JM, Smith LB, Stafford JM, et al. Shared decisionmaking among caregivers and health care providers of youth with type 1 diabetes. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 2014; 21: 234-243.
47. [47] Whittemore R, Jaser S, Chao A, Jang M, Grey M. Psychological experience of parents of children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2012; 38: 562-579.
48. [48] Ayala J, Howe C, Dumser S, Buzby M, Murphy K. Partnerships with providers: reflections from parents of children with type 1 diabetes. Western J of Nurs Res 2014; 36: 1238-1253.
49. [49] Wiley J, Westbrook M, Greenfield JR, Day RO, Braithwaite J. Shared decision-making: the perspectives of young adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Patient Prefer Adher 2014; 4: 423-435.
50. [50] Stacey D, Legare F, Col NF, et al. 2014. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, 1: doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub3/abstract;jsessionid=FACB92A106CCCF81EFE9F68EFE3A1947.f02t03. Accessed 3/20/15.
51. [51] Wilkinson MJ, Nathan AG, Huang ES. Personalized decision support in type 2 diabetes mellitus: current evidence and future directions. Curr Diab Rep 2013; 13: 205-212.
52. [52] Weymiller AJ, Montori VM, Jones LA, et al. Helping patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus make treatment decisions. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167: 1076-1082.
53. [53] http://www.cheo.on.ca/en/decisionaids
54. [54] http://www.dawnstudy.org/toolsandresources/dawndialoguetools-2014.asp
55. [55] Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: helping people change. 3rd ed. Guilford Press: New York 2013.
56. [56] Gayes LA, Steele RG. A meta-analysis of motivational interviewing interventions for pediatric health behavior change. J Consult Clin Psych 2014; 82: 521-535.
57. [57] Christie D, Channon S. The potential for motivational interviewing to improve outcomes in the management of diabetes and obesity in paediatric and adult populations: a clinical review. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014; 16: 381-387.
58. [58] Powell PW, Hilliard ME, Anderson BJ. Motivational interviewing to promote adherence behaviors in pediatric type 1 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2014; 14: 531-538.
59. [59] Channon SJ, Huws-Thomas MV, Rollnick S, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing in teenagers with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 1390-1395.
60. [60] Stanger C, Ryan SR, Delhey LM, et al. A multicomponent motivational intervention to improve adherence among adolescents with poorly controlled type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. J Pediatr Psychol 2013; 38: 629-637.
61. [61] Nansel TR, Iannotti RJ, Simons-Morton BG, et al. Diabetes personal trainer outcomes: short-term and 1-year outcomes of a diabetes personal trainer intervention among youth with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 2471-2477.
62. [62] Viner RM, Taylor VT, Hey S. Motivational/solution-focused intervention improves HbA1c in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 2003; 20: 739-742.
63. [63] Sonderlund LL, Madson, MB, Rubak S, Nilsen P. A systematic review of motivational interviewing training for general health care practitioners. Patient Educ Couns 2011; 84: 16-26.
64. [64] Lundahl B, Moleni T, Burke BL, et al. Motivational interviewing in medical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 93: 157-168.
65. [65] Rollnick S, Miller WR, Butler C. Motivational interviewing in health care: helping patients change behavior. Guilford Press: New York 2008.
66. [66] Bean MK, Biskobing D, Francis GL, Wickham E. Motivational interviewing in health care: results of a brief training in endocrinology. J Grad Med Educ 2012; 4: 357-361.
67. [67] Wang Y, Stewart SM, Mackenzie M, Nakonezny PA, Edwards D, White PC. A randomized controlled trial comparing motivational interviewing in education to structured diabetes education in teens with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 1741-1743.
68. [68] Robling M, McNamara R, Bennert K, et al. The effect of the Talking Diabetes consulting skills intervention on glycaemic control and quality of life in children with type 1 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial (DEPICTED study). BMJ 2012; 344: doi: 10.1136/bmj.e2359: Available from: http://www.bmj.com/content/344/bmj.e2359.full.pdf+html. Accessed 12/14/14.
69. [69] Sanchez I. Implementation of a diabetes self-management education program in primary care for adults using shared medical appointments. Diabetes Educ 2011; 37: 381-391.
70. [70] Trento M, Passera P, Tomalino M, et al. Group visits improve metabolic control in type 2 diabetes: a 2-year follow-up. Diabetes Care 2001; 24: 995-1000.
71. [71] Trento M, Passera P, Borgo E, et al. A 5-year randomized controlled study of learning, problem solving ability, and quality of life modifications in people with type 2 diabetes managed by group care. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 670–675.
72. [72] Rising SS. Centering pregnancy. An interdisciplinary model of empowerment. J Nurse Midwifery 1998; 43: 46-54.
73. [73] Noffsinger EB. Enhance satisfaction with drop-in group visits. Hippocrates 2001; 15: 30-36.
74. [74] Noffsinger EB. Running group visits in your practice. Springer Science+Business Media: New York 2009.
75. [75] Rijswijk Z, Zantinge E, Seesing F, Raats O, van Dulmen S. Shared and individual medical appointments for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes; differences in topics discussed? Patient Educ Couns 2010; 79: 351-355.
76. [76] Noordman J, van Dulman S. Shared medical appointments marginally enhance interaction between patients: an observational study on children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Patient Educ Couns 2013; 92: 418-425.
77. [77] Mejino A, Noordman J, van Dulman S. Shared medical appointments for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: perspectives and experiences of patients, parents, and health care providers. Adolesc Health Med Ther 2012; 2: 75-83.
78. [78] Raymond JK, Shea JJ, Berget C, et al. A novel approach to adolescents with type 1 diabetes: the team clinic model. Diabetes Spectr 2015; 28: 68-71
79. [79] https://carelink.minimed.com/patient/entry.jsp?bhcp=1
80. [80] http://www.diasend.com/us/
81. [81] Wong JC, Foster NC, Maahs DM, et al. Real-time continuous glucose monitoring among participants in the T1D Exchange clinic registry. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 2702-2709.
82. [82] Cemeroglu AP, Stone R, Kleis L, Racine MS, Postellon DC, Wood MA. Use of a real-time continuous glucose monitoring system in children and young adults on insulin pump therapy: patients’ and caregivers’ perception of benefit. Pediatr Diabetes 2010; 11: 182-187.
83. [83] DirecNet Study Group. Continuous glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr 2007; 151: 388-393.
84. [84] Hilliard ME, Goeke-Morey M, Cogen FR, Henderson C, Streisand R. Predictors of diabetes-related quality of life after transitioning to the insulin pump. J Pediatr Psychol 2009; 34: 137-146.
85. [85] Gonder-Frederick L, Shepard J, Peterson N. Closed-loop glucose control: psychological and behavioral considerations. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2011; 5: 1387-1395.
86. [86] Sullivan-Bolyai S, Deatrick J, Gruppuso P, Tamborlane W, Grey M. Mothers' experiences raising young children with type 1 diabetes. J Spec Pediatr Nurs 2002; 7: 93-103.
87. [87] Siminerio LM, Albanese-O’Neill A, Chiang JL, et al. Care of young children with diabetes in the child care setting: A position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2014; 37: 2834-2842.
88. [88] Driscoll K, Volkening LK, Haro H, et al. Are children with type 1 diabetes safe at school? Examining parent perceptions. Pediatr Diabetes 2014; doi: 10.1111/pedi.12204.
89. [89] Herbert LJ, Clary L, Owen V, Monaghan M, Alvarez V, Streisand R. Relations among school/daycare functioning, fear of hypoglycaemia and quality of life in parents of young children with type 1 diabetes. J Clin Nurs 2014; doi: 10.1111/jocn.12658.
90. [90] Tao B, Pietropaolo M, Atkinson M, Schatz D, Taylor D. Estimating the cost of type 1 diabetes in the U.S.: a propensity score matching method. PLoS One 2010; 5: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011501. Available from: http://www.plosone.org/article/fetchObject.action?uri=info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0011501&representation=PDF. Accessed 12/14/14.
91. [91] Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 42 U.S.C. § 18001 (2010).
92. [92] Burge MR, Schade DS. Diabetes and the Affordable are Act. Diabetes Technol Ther 2014; 16: 399-413.
93. [93] Gabbay RA, McGinley EL. The affordable care act, technology, and type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther 2014; 16: 819-821.
94. [94] Borg S, Palaszewski B, Gerdtham UG, Fredrik O, Roos P, Gudbjörnsdottir S. Patient-reported outcome measures and risk factors in a quality registry: a basis for more patient-centered diabetes care in Sweden. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014; 11: 12223-12246.