Effects of feed solution chemistry on low pressure reverse osmosis filtration of cesium and strontium

Journal of Hazardous Materials

Volumn 294, Issue , 2015, Pages 27-34

  Ding, Shiyuan ^a   Yang, Yu ^a   Huang, Haiou ^a   Liu, Hengchen ^a   Hou, Li an ^a,b  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b XI'AN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF HIGH TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Cesium; Co existing ions; Radionuclides; Reverse osmosis membrane; Strontium

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; CESIUM; ELECTROSTATICS; IONS; MEMBRANES; RADIOISOTOPES; REVERSE OSMOSIS; STRONTIUM; WATER TREATMENT;

CO-EXISTING; FEED CONCENTRATION; IONIC COMPOSITION; LOW-PRESSURE REVERSE OSMOSIS; MEMBRANE FLUXES; MEMBRANE SURFACE CHARGE; REMOVAL MECHANISM; SOLUTION CHEMISTRY;

OSMOSIS MEMBRANES;

ANION; CESIUM; HUMIC ACID; ION; ORGANIC MATTER; STRONTIUM; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; HUMIC SUBSTANCE; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; WATER POLLUTANT;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); FILTRATION; HUMIC ACID; INORGANIC COMPOUND; LOW PRESSURE; MEMBRANE; METAL; ORGANIC MATTER; OSMOSIS; RADIONUCLIDE; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; BIOFOULING; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); FILTRATION; HYPOBARISM; MEMBRANE STRUCTURE; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; REVERSE OSMOSIS; STATIC ELECTRICITY; SURFACE CHARGE; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; ARTIFICIAL MEMBRANE; CHEMISTRY; HUMIC SUBSTANCE; OSMOSIS; PH; PRESSURE; PROCEDURES; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTANT;

CESIUM; FILTRATION; HUMIC SUBSTANCES; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; OSMOSIS; PRESSURE; SOLUTIONS; STRONTIUM; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84939649076     PISSN: 03043894     EISSN: 18733336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.03.056     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Lytle D.A., Sorg T., Wang L.L., Chen A. The accumulation of radioactive contaminants in drinking water distribution systems. Water Res. 2014, 50:396-407.
2. Kozai N., Ohnuki T., Iwatsuki T. Characterization of saline groundwater at Horonobe, Hokkaido, Japan by SEC-UV-ICP-MS: Speciation of uranium and iodine. Water Res. 2013, 47:1570-1584.
3. Mouri G., Golosov V., Shiiba M., Hori T. Assessment of the caesium-137 flux adsorbed to suspended sediment in a reservoir in the contaminated Fukushima region in Japan. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 187:31-41.
4. Zhang C.P., Gu P., Zhao J., Zhang D., Deng Y. Research on the treatment of liquid waste containing cesium by an adsorption-microfiltration process with potassium zinc hexacyanoferrate. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 167:1057-1062.
5. Yin J., Jeen S.W., Lee D.R., Mayer K.U. Reactive transport modeling of 90Sr sorption in reactive sandpacks. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 280:685-695.
6. Yuksel S., Kabay N., Yuksel M. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 263:307-310.
7. Mozaz S.R., Ricart M., Schulmeyer M.K., Guasch H., Bonnineau C., Proia L., Alda M.L.D., Sabater S., Barcelo D. Pharmaceuticals and pesticides in reclaimed water: Efficiency assessment of a microfiltration-reverse osmosis (MF-RO) pilot plant. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 282:165-173.
8. Yoon J., Amy G., Chung J., Sohn J., Yoon Y. Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes. Chemosphere 2009, 77:228-235.
9. Rahman R.O.A., Ibrahium H.A., Hung Y.-T. Liquid Radioactive Wastes Treatment: A Review. Water 2011, 3:551-565.
10. Wang J., Liu H. Research advances in radioactive wastewater treatment using membrane processes. Acta Sci. Circumst. 2013, 33:2639-2656.
11. Zakrzewska-Trznadel G., Harasimowicz M., Chmielewski A.G. Membrane processes in nuclear technology - application for liquid radioactive waste treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2001, 22-23:617-625.
12. Han F., Zhang G.H., Gu P. Removal of cesium from simulated liquid waste with countercurrent two-stage adsorption followed by microfiltration. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 225-226:107-113.
13. Nieto A., Palomo M., Ruana J., Penalver A., Aguilar C., Borrull F. Evaluation of the use of reverse osmosis to eliminate natural radionuclides from water samples. Water Environ. Res. 2013, 85:2265-2270.
14. Montana M., Camacho A., Serrano I., Devesa R., Matia L., Valles I. Removal of radionuclides in drinking water by membrane treatment using ultrafiltration, reverse osmosis and electrodialysis reversal. J. Environ. Radioact. 2013, 125:86-92.
15. Khedr M.G. Radioactive contamination of groundwater, special aspects and advantages of removal by reverse osmosis and nanofiltration. Desalination 2013, 321:47-54.
16. Sasaki T., Okabe J., Henmi M., Hayashi H., Iida Y. Cesium (Cs) and strontium (Sr) removal as model materials in radioactive water by advanced reverse osmosis membrane. Desalin. Water Treat. 2013, 51:1672-1677.
17. Bellona C., Drewes J.E., Xu P., Amy G. Factors affecting the rejection of organic solutes during NF/RO treatment-a literature review. Water Res. 2004, 38:2795-2809.
18. Williams M.E. A Review of Reverse Osmosis Theory 2003, EET Corporation and Williams Engineering Services Company, Inc.
19. Sherwood T., Brian P., Fisher R. Desalination by reverse osmosis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Fundam. 1967, 6:2-12.
20. Fujioka T., Nghiem L.D., Khan S.J., McDonald J.A., Poussade Y., Drewes J.E. Effects of feed solution characteristics on the rejection of N-nitrosamines by reverse osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 409-410:66-74.
21. Pronk W., Palmquist H., Biebow M., Boller M. Nanofiltration for the separation of pharmaceuticals from nutrients in source-separated urine. Water Res. 2006, 40:1405-1412.
22. Wang X.-L., Tsuru T., Nakao S.-I., Kimura S. The electrostatic and steric-hindrance model for the transport of charged solutes through nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1997, 135:19-32.
23. Mukherjee P., Sengupta A.K. Ion exchange selectivity as a surrogate indicator of relative permeability of ions in reverse osmosis processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37:1432-1440.
24. Verliefde A.R.D., Cornelissen E.R., Heijman S.G.J., Verberk J.Q.J.C., Amy G.L., Van der Bruggen B., van Dijk J.C. The role of electrostatic interactions on the rejection of organic solutes in aqueous solutions with nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 322:52-66.
25. Seidel A., Waypa J.J., Elimelech M. Role of charge (Donnan) exclusion in removal of arsenic from water by a negatively charged porous nanofiltration membrane. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2001, 18:105-113.
26. Liu L.F., Yu S.C., Wu L.G., Gao C.J. Study on a novel polyamide-urea reverse osmosis composite membrane (ICIC-MPD): II. Analysis of membrane antifouling performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 283:133-146.
27. Van Wagner E.M., Sagle A.C., Sharma M.M., Freeman B.D. Effect of crossflow testing conditions including feed pH and continuous feed filtration, on commercial reverse osmosis membrane performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 345:97-109.
28. Mo H., Tay K.G., Ng H.Y. Fouling of reverse osmosis membrane by protein (BSA): effects of pH, calcium, magnesium, ionic strength and temperature. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 315:28-35.
29. Oo M.H., Song L. Effect of pH and ionic strength on boron removal by RO membranes. Desalination 2009, 246:605-612.
30. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 119:253-268.
31. Arnal J.M., Sancho M., Verdú G., Campayo J.M., Villaescusa J.I. Treatment of 137Cs liquid wastes by reverse osmosis Part I. Preliminary tests. Desalination 2003, 154:27-33.
32. Tian J.Y., Ernst M., Cui F.Y., Jekel M. Effect of different cations on UF membrane fouling by NOM fractions. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 223:547-555.
33. Bartels C., Franks R., Rybar S., Schierach M., Wilf M. The effect of feed ionic strength on salt passage through reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 2005, 184:185-195.
34. Ozaki H., Sharma K., Saktaywin W. Performance of an ultra-low-pressure reverse osmosis membrane (ULPROM) for separating heavy metal: effects of interference parameters. Desalination 2002, 144:287-294.
35. Déon S., Dutournié P., Fievet P., Limousy L., Bourseau P. Concentration polarization phenomenon during the nanofiltration of multi-ionic solutions: influence of the filtrated solution and operating conditions. Water Res. 2013, 47:2260-2272.
36. Nightingale E.R. Phenomenological theory of ion solvation. Effective radii of hydrated ions. J. Phys. Chem. 1959, 63:1381-1387.
37. Choi S., Yun Z., Hong S., Ahn K. The effect of co-existing ions and surface characteristics of nanomembranes on the removal of nitrate and fluoride. Desalination 2001, 133:53-64.
38. Marcus Y. Ionic radii in aqueous solutions. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88:1475-1498.
39. Al-Amoudi A.S. Factors affecting natural organic matter (NOM) and scaling fouling in NF membranes: A review. Desalination 2010, 259:1-10.
40. Ng H.Y., Elimelech M. Influence of colloidal fouling on rejection of trace organic contaminants by reverse osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 244:215-226.