Removal of toxic ions (chromate, arsenate, and perchlorate) using reverse osmosis, nanofiltration, and ultrafiltration membranes

Chemosphere

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 228-235

  Yoon, Jaekyung ^a   Amy, Gary ^b   Chung, Jinwook ^c   Sohn, Jinsik ^d   Yoon, Yeomin ^e  

^a Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER)   (South Korea)

^b KING ABDULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c Samsung Engineering Co Ltd   (South Korea)

^d Kookmin University   (South Korea)

^e University of South Carolina   (United States)

Author keywords

Arsenate; Chromate; Membrane rejection; Perchlorate; Water treatment

Indexed keywords

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; CHROMATES; MICROFILTRATION; NANOFILTRATION; NEGATIVE IONS; PH; PORE SIZE; POTASH; REVERSE OSMOSIS; TRANSPORT PROPERTIES; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER TREATMENT;

ARSENATE; INCREASING SOLUTIONS; MEMBRANE PORE RADIUS; MEMBRANE REJECTION; PERCHLORATE; PERCHLORATE SOLUTIONS; SOLUTION CONDUCTIVITY; ULTRA-FILTRATION MEMBRANES;

OSMOSIS MEMBRANES;

ARSENIC ACID; CALCIUM CHLORIDE; CHROMIC ACID; DRINKING WATER; NITRITE; PERCHLORATE; POTASSIUM; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; SULFATE; WATER;

ARSENATE; CHROMATE; ION; MEMBRANE; OSMOSIS; PERCHLORATE; PH; REMOVAL EXPERIMENT; TOXIC MATERIAL; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEAVY METAL REMOVAL; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; NANOFILTRATION; PH; POROSITY; QUALITY CONTROL; REVERSE OSMOSIS; ULTRAFILTRATION; WATER QUALITY;

EID: 69449099762     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.07.028     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ATSDR. Toxicological Profile for Chromium (1993), Department of Health Services, US Public Health Service, La Porte County, Indiana
2. Bowen W.R., and Mohammad A.W. Characterization and prediction of nanofiltration membrane performance - A general assessment. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 76 (1998) 885-893
3. Brandhuber P., and Amy G. Arsenic removal by a charged ultrafiltration membrane - influences of membrane operating conditions and water quality on arsenic rejection. Desalination 140 (2001) 1-14
4. Childress A.E., and Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 119 (1996) 253-268
5. Childress A.E., and Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (2000) 3710-3716
6. Cho J., Amy G., and Pellegrino J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: Initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 33 (1999) 2517-2526
7. Cho J., Amy G., and Pellegrino J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: factors and mechanisms affecting rejection and flux decline with charged ultrafiltration (UF) membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 164 (2000) 89-110
8. Elimelech M., Chen W.H., and Waypa J.J. Measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potential of reverse-osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer. Desalination 95 (1994) 269-286
9. Elimelech M., and Omelia C.R. Effect of electrolyte type on the electrophoretic mobility of polystyrene latex colloids. Colloids Surf. 44 (1990) 165-178
10. EPA, 2002. Perchlorate Environmental Contamination: Toxicological Review and Risk Characterization Based on Emerging Information EPA, Report. NCEA-1-0535.
11. Ergican E., Gecol H., and Fuchs A. The effect of co-occurring inorganic solutes on the removal of arsenic (V) from water using cationic surfactant micelles and an ultrafiltration membrane. Desalination 181 (2005) 9-26
12. Golder A.K., Chanda A.K., Samanta A.N., and Ray S. Removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution: Electrocoagulation vs chemical coagulation. Sep. Sci. Technol. 42 (2007) 2177-2193
13. Habuda-Stanic M., Kalajdzic B., Kules M., and Velic N. Arsenite and arsenate sorption by hydrous ferric oxide/polymeric material. Desalination 229 (2008) 1-9
14. Hong S., and Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 132 (1997) 159-181
15. Kim J., and Benjamin M.M. Modeling a novel ion exchange process for arsenic and nitrate removal. Water Res. 38 (2004) 2053-2062
16. Kosutic K., Furac L., Sipos L., and Kunst B. Removal of arsenic and pesticides from drinking water by nanofiltration membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 42 (2005) 137-144
17. Lee S., and Lueptow R.M. Reverse osmosis filtration for space mission wastewater: membrane properties and operating conditions. J. Membr. Sci. 182 (2001) 77-90
18. Moore K.W., Huck P.M., and Siverns K. Arsenic removal using oxidative media and nanofiltration. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 100 12 (2008) 74-83
19. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology. second ed. (1996), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
20. Muthukrishnan M., and Guha B.K. Effect of pH on rejection of hexavalent chromium by nanofiltration. Desalination 219 (2008) 171-178
21. Sato Y., Kang M., Kamei T., and Magara Y. Performance of nanofiltration for arsenic removal. Water Res. 36 (2002) 3371-3377
22. Smith A.H., Lopipero P.A., Bates M.N., and Steinmaus C.M. Public health - arsenic epidemiology and drinking water standards. Science 296 (2002) 2145-2146
23. Stumm W. Chemistry of the Solid-Water Interface (1992), Wiley, New Work
24. Uddin M.T., Mozumder M.S.I., Islam M.A., Deowan S.A., and Hoinkis J. Nanofiltration membrane process for the removal of arsenic from drinking water. Chem. Eng. Technol. 30 (2007) 1248-1254
25. Van Ginkel S.W., Ahn C.H., Badruzzaman M., Roberts D.J., Lehman S.G., Adham S.S., and Rittmann B.E. Kinetics of nitrate and perchlorate reduction in ion-exchange brine using the membrane biofilm reactor (MBfR). Water Res. 42 (2008) 4197-4205
26. Wilbert M.C., Delagah S., and Pellegrino J. Variance of streaming potential measurements. J. Membr. Sci. 161 (1999) 247-261
27. Yoon J., Yoon Y., Amy G., and Her N. Determination of perchlorate rejection and associated inorganic fouling (scaling) for reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes under various operating conditions. J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE 131 (2005) 726-733
28. Yoon Y., Amy G., Cho J., and Her N. Effects of retained natural organic matter (NOM) on NOM rejection and membrane flux decline with nanofiltration and ultrafiltration. Desalination 173 (2005) 209-221
29. Yoon Y., Amy G., Cho J., and Pellegrino J. Systematic bench-scale assessment of perchlorate rejection mechanisms by nanofiltration and ultrafiltration membranes. Sep. Sci. Technol. 39 (2004) 2105-2135
30. Yoon Y., and Lueptow R.M. Removal of organic contaminants by RO and NF membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 261 (2005) 76-86