The effect of different aeration conditions in activated sludge - Side-stream system on sludge production, sludge degradation rates, active biomass and extracellular polymeric substances

Water Research

Volumn 85, Issue , 2015, Pages 46-56

  Habermacher, Jonathan ^a,c   Benetti, Antonio Domingues ^a,b   Derlon, Nicolas ^a,c   Morgenroth, Eberhard ^a,c  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Endogenous decay; EPS; Exoenzymes; Side stream reactor; Solid retention time; Starvation

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BIOMASS; CARBOHYDRATES; PROTEINS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

CONDITION; ENDOGENOUS DECAY; EXO-ENZYMES; EXTRACELLULAR; EXTRACELLULAR POLYMERIC SUBSTANCE; POLYMERIC SUBSTANCE; SIDE STREAMS; SIDE-STREAM REACTOR; SOLID RETENTION TIME; STARVATION;

DEGRADATION;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; CARBOHYDRATE; PROTEIN; POLYMER; SEWAGE; WASTE WATER;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; AERATION; BIODEGRADATION; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; CARBOHYDRATE; OXIC CONDITIONS; POLYMER; PROTEIN; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; AERATION; ARTICLE; BATCH REACTOR; BIOMASS; DEGRADATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; HYDROLYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; SIDE STREAM REACTOR; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; WASTE WATER; BIOREACTOR; CHEMISTRY; PROCEDURES; SEWAGE;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; BIOMASS; BIOREACTORS; POLYMERS; SEWAGE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WASTE WATER;

EID: 84939644915     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: 18792448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. APHA, AWWA, WEF Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. 21st ed.
2. Batstone D.J., Keller J., Angelidaki I., Kalyuzhnyi S.V., Pavlostathis S.G., Rozzi A., Sander W.T.M., Siegrist H., Vavilin V.A. The IWA anaerobic digestion model No 1 (ADM1). Water Sci. Technol. 2002, 45(No 10):65-73.
3. BRENDA BRENDA (BRaunschweig ENzyme Database) 2007, TU Braunschweig.
4. Chon D.-H., Rome M., Kim Y.M., Park K.Y., Park C. Investigation of the sludge reduction mechanism in the anaerobic side-stream reactor process using several control biological wastewater treatment processes. Water Res. 2011, 45:6021-6029.
5. Coma M., Rovira S., Canals J., Colprim J. Minimization of sludge production by a side-stream reactor under anoxic conditions in a pilot plant. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 129:229-235.
6. Datta T., Liu Y., Goel R. Evaluation of simultaneous nutrient removal and sludge reduction using laboratory scale sequencing batch reactors. Chemosphere 2009, 76:697-705.
7. Foladori P., Andreottola G., Ziglio G. Sludge Reduction Technologies in Wastewater Treatment Plants 2010, IWA Publishing.
8. Foladori P., Velho V.F., Costa R.H.R., Bruni L., Quaranta A., Andreottola G. Concerning the role of cell lysis-cryptic growth in anaerobic side-stream reactors: the single-cell analysis of viable, dead and lysed bacteria. Water Res. 2015, 74:132-142.
9. Goel R., Mino T., Satoh H., Matsuo T. Enzyme activities under anaerobic and aerobic conditions in activated sludge sequencing batch reactor. Water Res. 1998, 32:2081-2088.
10. Gujer W., Henze M., Mino T., Loosdrecht M.v Activated sludge model No. 3. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 39:183-193.
11. Henze M., Gujer W., Mino T., Van Loosdrecht M. Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 2000, IWA Publishing.
12. Huang P., Li L., Kotay S.M., Goel R. Carbon mass balance and microbial ecology in a laboratory scale reactor achieving simultaneous sludge reduction and nutrient removal. Water Res. 2014, 53:153-167.
13. Johnson B.R., Daigger G.T., Novak J.T. The use of ASM based models for the simulation of biological sludge reduction processes. Water Pract. Technol. 2008, 3.
14. Kemp P.F. Handbook of Methods in Aquatic Microbial Ecology 1993, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton.
15. Laspidou C.S., Rittmann B.E. Non-steady state modeling of extracellular polymeric substances, soluble microbial products, and active and inert biomass. Water Res. 2002, 36:1983-1992.
16. Lessie T.G., Wyk J.C.V. Multiple forms of Pseudomonas multivorans glucose-6-phosphate and 6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenases: differences in size, pyridine nucleotide specificity, and susceptibility to inhibition by adenosine 5'-triphosphate. J. Bacteriol. 1972, 110:1107-1117.
17. Lobos J., Wisniewski C., Heran M., Grasmick A. Sequencing versus continuous membrane bioreactors: effect of substrate to biomass ratio (F/M) on process performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 317:71-77.
18. Martínez-García C.G., Olguín M.T., Fall C. Aerobic stabilization of biological sludge characterized by an extremely low decay rate: modeling, identifiability analysis and parameter estimation. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 166:112-119.
19. Novak J.T., Chon D.H., Curtis B.-A., Doyle M. Biological solids reduction using the Cannibal process. Water Environ. Res. 2007, 79:2380-2386.
20. Novak J.T., Sadler M.E., Murthy S.N. Mechanisms of floc destruction during anaerobic and aerobic digestion and the effect on conditioning and dewatering of biosolids. Water Res. 2003, 37:3136-3144.
21. Park C., Abu-Orf M.M., Novak J.T. The digestibility of waste activated sludges. Water Environ. Res. 2006, 78:59-68.
22. Ramdani A., Dold P., Gadbois A., Déléris S., Houweling D., Comeau Y. Biodegradation of the endogenous residue of activated sludge in a membrane bioreactor with continuous or on-off aeration. Water Res. 2012, 46:2837-2850.
23. Ras M., Girbal-Neuhauser E., Paul E., Lefebvre D. A high yield multi-method extraction protocol for protein quantification in activated sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99:7464-7471.
24. Saby S., Djafer M., Chen G.H. Effect of low ORP in anoxic sludge zone on excess sludge production in oxic-settling-anoxic activated sludge process. Water Res. 2003, 37:11-20.
25. Semblante G.U., Hai F.I., Ngo H.H., Guo W., You S.-J., Price W.E., Nghiem L.D. Sludge cycling between aerobic, anoxic and anaerobic regimes to reduce sludge production during wastewater treatment: performance, mechanisms, and implications. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 155:395-409.
26. Siegrist H., Brunner I., Koch G., Phan L.C., Le V.C. Reduction of biomass decay rate under anoxic and anaerobic conditions. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 39:129-137.
27. Sperandio M., Labelle M.-A., Ramdani A., Gadbois A., Paul E., Comeau Y., Dold P.L. Modelling the degradation of endogenous residue and 'unbiodegradable' influent organic suspended solids to predict sludge production. Water Sci. Technol. 2013, 67:789-796.
28. Sun L., Randall C.W., Novak J.T. The influence of sludge interchange times on the oxic-settling-anoxic process. Water Environ. Res. 2010, 82:519-523.
29. Svardal K., Kroiss H. Energy requirements for waste water treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2011, 64:1355-1361.
30. Tchobanoglous G., Burton F.L., Stensel H.D. Wastewater Engineering - Treatment and Reuse 2003, Tata McGraw-Hill. Tata McGraw-Hill Edition 2003 ed. (Ed.).
31. Yagci N., Novak J.T., Randall C.W., Orhon D. The effect of iron dosing on reducing waste activated sludge in the oxic-settling-anoxic process. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 193:213-218.