Modelling the degradation of endogenous residue and 'unbiodegradable' influent organic suspended solids to predict sludge production

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 67, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 789-796

  Spérandio, Mathieu ^a,b,c   Labelle, Marc André ^d   Ramdani, Abdellah ^d   Gadbois, Alain ^e   Paul, Etienne ^a,b,c   Comeau, Yves ^d   Dold, Peter L ^f  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^b UMR792 INGÉNIERIE DES SYSTÈMES BIOLOGIQUES ET DES PROCÉDÉS   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^e John Meunier Inc   (Canada)

^f EnviroSim Assocites Ltd   (Canada)

Author keywords

Endogenous residue; Long SRT; Membrane bioreactor; Modelling; Sludge production; Total solids retention

Indexed keywords

ENDOGENOUS RESIDUE; LONG SRT; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; SLUDGE PRODUCTION; TOTAL SOLIDS;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BIOCHEMISTRY; DEGRADATION; MODELS;

BIOREACTORS;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; BIOAVAILABILITY; BIODEGRADATION; BIOREACTOR; MEMBRANE; NUMERICAL MODEL; SUSPENDED LOAD; WASTEWATER;

ARTICLE; DEGRADATION; MEMBRANE REACTOR; SLUDGE TREATMENT; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

BIOREACTORS; MEMBRANES, ARTIFICIAL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SEWAGE;

EID: 84874847567     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2012.629     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Al-Halbouni, D., Trabcr, J., Lyko, S., Wintgcns, T., Melin, T., Tackc, D., Janot, A., Dott, W. & Hollcndcr, J. 2008 Corrclation of EPS content in activated sludge at different sludge retention times with mcmbranc fouling phcnomcna. Water Research 42 (6 - 7), 1475 - 1488.
2. Bhatta, C. P., Matsuda, A., Kawasaki, K. & Omori, D. 2004 Minimization of sludgc production and stable operational condition of a submcrged membranc activated sludge proccss. Water Science and Technology 50 (9), 12 1 - 128.
3. Buisson, H., Cotc, P., Praderic, M. & Paillard, H. 1998 The use of immersed membranes for upgrading wastewater treatment plants. Water Science and Technology 37 (9), 89 - 95.
4. Chaize, S. & Huyard, A. 1991 Membrane biorcactor on domestic wastewater treatment sludge production and modelling approach. Water Science and Technology 23 (7 - 9), 1591 - 1600.
5. Chicmchaisri, C., Wong, Y. K., Urasc, T. & Yamamoto, K. 1992 Organic stabilization and nitrogen removal in membrane separation bioreactor for domesic wastewater treatment Water Science and Technology 25 (10), 23 1 - 240.
6. Corominas, L., Rieger, L., Takács, I., Ekama, 0., Hauduc, H., Vanrollcghem, P. A., Oehmcn, A., Gernacy, K. V., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. & Comeau, Y. 2010 New framework for standardized notation in wastcwater treatment modelling. Water Science and Technology 61 (4), 841 - 857.
7. Coté, P., Buisson, H. & Pradcrie, M. 1998 Immersed membranes activated sludge proccss applied to thc treatment of municipal wastewatcr. Water Science and Technology 38 (4 - 5), 437 - 442.
8. de Wever, H., Brannock, M., Leslie, 0. & Brepols, C. 2008 Inside or outside submerged MBR: which one is better? Membranes in Drinking Water Production and Wastewater Treatmcnt. IWA conference, 20 - 22 October, Toulouse, Francc.
9. Delruc, F., Choubert, J. M., Stricker, A. E., Spérandio, M., MiettonPeuchot, M. & Racault, Y. 2010 Modelling a full scale membrane biorcactor using activated sludge Model n 1: challenges and solutions. Water Science and Technology 62 (10), 2205 - 2217.
10. Dimock, R. & Morgenroth, E. 2006 The influence of particle sizc on microbial hydrolysis of protein particles in activatcd sludge. Water Research 40 (10), 2064 - 2074.
11. Dold, P. L., Ekama, 0. A. & Marais, 0. v. R. 1980 A general model for the activated sludge process. Progress in Water Technology 12 (6), 47 - 77.
12. du Toit, 0. J. 0., Ramphao, M. C., Parco, V., Wentzel, M. C. & Ekama, 0. A. 2007 Design and performancc of BNR activated sludge systems with flat sheet membrancs for solid-liquid separation. Water Science and Technology 56 (6), 105 - 113.
13. Fenu, A., Guglielmi, 0., Jimenez, J., Spérandio, M., Saroj, D., Lesjean, B., Brepols, C., Thoeyc, C. & Nopens, I. 2010 Activated sludge model (ASM) bascd modelling of membrane biorcactor (MBR) proccsscs: a critical rcview with special rcgard to MBR specificities. Water Research 44 (15), 4272 - 4294.
14. Ginestet, P., Maisonnicr, A. & Spérandio, M. 2002 Wastewater COD characterization: biodegradability of physicochemical fractions. Water Science and Technology 45 (6), 89 - 97.
15. Hay, C. T., Sun, D. D., Khor, S. L. & Lcckic, J. 0. 2006 Effcct of 200 days' sludge retention time on performance of a pilot scale submcrgcd mcmbranc bioreactor for high strcngth industrial wastewater treatment. Water Science and Technology 53 (11), 269 - 276.
16. Henzc, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T. & Van Loosdrecht, M. 2000 Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. IWA Publishing, London, UK.
17. Heran, M., Wisnicwski, C., Orantes, J. & Grasmick, A. 2008 Measurement of kinetic parametcrs in a submerged acrobic membrane biorcactor fed on acetate and operated without biomass discharge. Biochemical Engineering Journal 38 (1), 70 - 77.
18. Jimenez, J., Grelicr, P., Meinhold, J. & Tazi-Pain, A. 2010 Biological modelling of MBR and impact of primary scdimcntation. Desalination 250 (2), 562 - 567.
19. Jones, R., Parker, W., Khan, Z., Murthy, S. & Rupke, M. 2007 A study of thc biodegradable fraction of sludges in aerobic and anacrobic systcms. In: Proceedings of the WEF Specialty Con ference on Residuals and Biosolids Management, Denver, CO.
20. Lacra, 0., Pollice, A., Saturno, D., Giordano, C. & Lopcz, A. 2005 Zcro nct growth in a membranc biorcactor with complcte sludge retention. Water Research 39 (20), 5241 - 5249.
21. Lesage, N., Spérandio, M. & Cabassud, C. 2005 Pcrformances of a hybrid adsorption/submcrged membranc biological process for toxic waste removal. Water Science and Technology 51 (6 - 7), 173 - 180.
22. Lubello, C., Caffaz, S., Gori, R. & Munz, 0. 2009 A modified activated sludge model to estimatc solids production at low and high solids retention timc. Water Research 43 (18), 4539 - 4548.