A randomized controlled trial of a multi-dose bystander intervention program using peer education theater

Health Education Research

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 554-568

  McMahon, Sarah ^a   Winter, Samantha C ^a   Palmer, Jane E ^a   Postmus, Judy L ^a   Peterson, N Andrew ^a   Zucker, Sharon ^a   Koenick, Ruthanne ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; COUNSELING; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; LITERATURE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; PEER GROUP; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEXUAL CRIME; UNIVERSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; COUNSELING; DRAMA; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; INTENTION; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PEER GROUP; SEX OFFENSES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84939604698     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyv022     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Krebs CP, Lindquist CH, Warner TD et al. The Campus Sexual Assault (CSA) Study: Final Report. Washington DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 2007. Available at: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/221153.pdf. Accessed: 26 May 2014.
2. Kilpatrick D, Resnick H, Ruggiero K et al. Drug Facilitated, Incapacitated and Forcible Rape: A National Study. Washington DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice, 2007. Available at: https://www.ncjrs. gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/219181.pdf. Accessed: 26 May 2014.
3. White House. Not Alone: The first Report of the White House Task Force to Protect Students from Sexual Assault. The White House. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/report-0.pdf. Accessed: 29 April 2014.
4. Banyard VL, Plante EG, Moynihan MM. Bystander education: bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. J Community Psychol 2004; 32: 61-79.
5. McMahon S, Postmus JL, Koenick RA. Conceptualizing the engaging bystander approach to sexual violence prevention on college campuses. J Coll Stud Dev 2011; 15: 115-30.
6. Prevention Strategies: SCREAM Theater. New Jersey Coalition of Sexual Assault. Available at: http://njcasa.org/ prevention/prevention-strategies. Accessed: 6 February 2014.
7. White House. Bystander-Focused Prevention of Sexual Violence: Tip Sheet. The White House. Available at: https://www.notalone.gov/assets/bystander-summary.pdf. Accessed: 29 April 2014.
8. Banyard VL, Moynihan MM, Plante EG. Sexual violence prevention through bystander education: an experimental evaluation. J Community Psychol 2007; 35: 463-81.
9. Burn SM. A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles 2009; 60:779-92.
10. Latane B, Darley JM. The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1970.
11. Fabiano P, Perkins H, Berkowitz A et al. Engagingmen as social justice allies in ending violence against women: evidence for a social norms approach. J Am Coll Health 2003; 52: 105-12
12. Jennings JM, Howard S, Perotte CL. Effects of a school-based sexuality education program on peer educators: the teen PEP model. Health Educ Res. 2014; 29: 319-29.
13. Moynihan MM, Banyard VL, Cares AC et al. Encouraging responses in sexual and relationship violence prevention: what program effects remain one year later? J Interpers Violence 2014; 30: 110-32.
14. Ahrens CE, Rich MD, Ullman JB. Rehearsing for real life: the impact of the InterACT Sexual Assault Prevention Program on self-reported likelihood of engaging in bystander interventions. Violence Against Women 2011; 17: 760-76.
15. Black B, Weisz A, Coats S et al. Evaluating a psychoeducational sexual assault prevention program incorporating theatrical presentation, peer education, and social work. Res Soc Work Pract 2000; 10: 589-606.
16. Christensen MC. Using theater of the oppressed to prevent sexual violence on college campuses. Trauma Violence Abuse 2013; 14: 282-94.
17. Kress VE, Shepherd JB, Anderson RI et al. Evaluation of the impact of a coeducational sexual assault prevention program on college students' rape myth attitudes. J Col lCouns 2006; 9: 148-57.
18. McMahon S, Postmus JL, Warrener C et al. Utilizing peer education theater for the primary prevention of sexual violence on college campuses. J Coll Stud Dev 2014; 55: 78-85.
19. Casey E, Lindhorst T. Toward a multi-level, ecological approach to the primary prevention of sexual assault: prevention in peer and community contexts. Trauma Violence Abuse 2009; 10: 91-114.
20. McMahon S, Hoffman ML, McMahon SM et al. What would you do? Sexual violence bystander intervention strategies for college students. J College and Character 2013; 14: 141-51.
21. Coker AL, Cook-Craig PG, Williams CM et al. Evaluation of green dot: an active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses. Violence Against Women 2011; 17: 777-96.
22. Vladutiu CJ, Martin SL, Macy RJ. College- or university-based sexual assault prevention programs: a review of program outcomes, characteristics, and recommendations. Trauma Violence Abuse 2011; 1: 67-86.
23. Banyard VL. Measurement and correlates of pro-social bystander behavior: the case of interpersonal violence. Violence Vict 2008; 23: 85-99.
24. Brown AL, Messman-Moore TL. Personal and perceived peer attitudes supporting sexual aggression as predictors of male college students' willingness to intervene against sexual aggression. J Interpers Violence 2010; 25: 503-17.
25. Laguilles J, Williams E, Saunders D. Can lottery incentives boost web survey response rates? Findings from four experiments. Res High Educ 2011; 52: 537-53.
26. Galea S, Tracy M. Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Ann Epidemiol 2007; 17: 643-53.
27. McFarlane J. Strategies for successful recruitment and retention of abused women for longitudinal studies. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2007; 28: 883-97.
28. Robinson K, Dennison C, Wayman D et al. Systematic review identifies number of strategies important for retaining study participants. J Clin Epidemiol 2007; 60: 757.
29. Ribisl, KM, Walton MA, Mowbray CT et al. Minimizing participant attrition in panel studies through the use of effective retention and tracking strategies: review and recommendations. Eval Prog Plann 1996; 19: 1-25.
30. Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method-2007 Update With New Internet, Visual, and Mixed-Mode Guide. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2011.
31. Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G et al. Post randomization exclusions: the intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ 2002; 325: 652-4.
32. Gupta S. Intention-to-treat concept: a review. Perspect Clin Res 2011; 2: 109-12.
33. McMahon S, Allen CT, Postmus JL et al. Measuring bystander attitudes and behavior to prevent sexual violence. J Am Coll Health 2014; 62: 58-66.
34. Banyard VL, Moynihan MM, Cares AC et al. How do we know if it works? Measuring outcomes in bystander-focused abuse prevention on campuses. Psychol Violence 2014; 4: 101-15.
35. Murphy MJ. Sexual Assault-Specific Bystander Behavior: Accounting for Opportunity in a Prospective Analysis of the Effects of Individual, Social Norms and Situational Variables [dissertation]. Athens, OH: Ohio University, 2013.
36. Mayers A. Introduction to Statistics and SPSS in Psychology. Edinburgh, UK: Pearson Education, 2013.
37. Lewis-Beck M, Bryman AE, Liao TF (eds). The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, vol. 1. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 2004.
38. Armijo-Olivo S, Warren S, Magee D. Intention to treat analysis, compliance, drop-outs and how to deal with missing data in clinical research: a review. Phys Ther Rev 2009; 14: 36-49.
39. Banyard VL. Who will help prevent sexual violence: creating an ecological model of bystander intervention. Psychol Violence 2011; 1: 216-29.
40. Braver SL, Smith MC. Maximizing both external and internal validity in longitudinal true experiments with voluntary treatments: the "combined modified" design. Eval Program Plann 1996; 19: 287-300.
41. th Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association; Denver, CO, October 2014.
42. Schnell R, Bachteler T, Reiher J. Improving the use of self-generated identification codes. Eval Rev 2010; 34: 391-418.
43. McMahon S, Palmer J, Banyard V et al. Measuring bystander behavior in the context of sexual assault prevention: Lessons learned and new directions. J Interpers Violence forthcoming.