Measuring bystander attitudes and behavior to prevent sexual violence

Journal of American College Health

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 58-66

  McMahon, Sarah ^a   Allen, Christopher T ^a   Postmus, Judy L ^a   McMahon, Sheila M ^a   Andrew Peterson, N ^a   Hoffman, Melanie Lowe ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bystander intervention; Sexual violence

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOLOGY; SEXUAL CRIME; SOCIOECONOMICS; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; PROGRAM EVALUATION; SEX OFFENSES; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84890854126     PISSN: 07448481     EISSN: 19403208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2013.849258     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 Summary Report. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2011.
2. Karjane HM, Fisher BS, Cullen FT. Sexual Assault on Campus: What Colleges and Universities Are Doing About It. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, National Institute for Justice; 2005. Research Report 2005:NCJ 205521.
3. Fisher BS, Cullen FT, Turner MG. The Sexual Victimization of College Women. Washington, DC: Office of Justice Programs, National Insitute for Justice; 2000. Research report 182369.
4. Campbell R. The psychological impact of rape victims' experiences with legal, medical, and mental health systems. Am Psychol. 2008;63:702-717.
5. Anderson LA, Whitson SC. Sexual assault education programs: a meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychol Women Q. 2005;29:374-388. (Pubitemid 43061710)
6. Potter JS, Banyard VL. Guest editors' introduction. Violence Against Women. 2011;17:679-683.
7. Banyard VL, Plante EG, Moynihan MM. Bystander education: bringing a broader community perspective to sexual violence prevention. J Community Psychol. 2004;32:61-79. (Pubitemid 38038108)
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexual Violence Prevention: Beginning the Dialogue. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2004. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/Ncipc/dvp/SVPrevention.pdf. Accessed February 6, 2008.
9. American College Health Association. Position statement on preventing sexual violence on college and university campuses. Available at: http://www.acha.org/info resources/ACHA Sexual Violence Statement07.pdf. Published April 2007. Accessed February 6, 2008.
10. McMahon S, Banyard VL. When can I help? a conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2012;13:3-14.
11. Horowitz DJ. A Grounded Theory Analysis of Student Perspectives in the University of Wisconsin Madison Greek Men in Violence Prevention Program [dissertation]. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin; 2010.
12. Banyard VL, Plante EG, Moynihan MM. Rape Prevention Through Bystander Education: Final Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice; 2005. Document no. 208701. Available at: http://www.ncjrs.org/pdffiles1/nij/grants/ 208701.pdf. Accessed November 9, 2007.
13. McMahon S, Postmus JL, Koenick RA. Engaging bystanders: a primary prevention approach to sexual violence on campus. J Coll Stud Dev. 2011;52:115-130.
14. Banyard VL, Moynihan MM. Variation in bystander behavior related to sexual and intimate partner violence prevention: correlates in a sample of college students. Psychol Violence. 2011;1:287-301.
15. Casey AE, Ohler K. Being a positive bystander: male antiviolence allies' axperiences of "stepping up." J Interpers Violence. 2012;27:62-83.
16. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2010.
17. Banyard VL, Cross C. Consequences of teen dating violence: understanding intervening variables in ecological context. Violence Against Women. 2008;14:998-1013.
18. Ahrens CE, Rich MD, Ullman JB. Rehearsing for real life: the impact of Inter ACT sexual assault prevention program on selfreported likelihood of enganging in bystander interventions. Violence Against Women. 2011;17:760-776.
19. Foubert JD, Langhinrichsen-Rohlin J, Brasfield H, Hill B. Effects of a rape awareness program on college women: increasing bystander efficacy and willingness to intervene. J Community Psychol. 2010;38:813-827.
20. Moynihan MM, Banyard VL, Arnold JS, Eckstein RP, Stapleton JG. Engaging intercollegiate athletes in preventing and intervening in sexual and intimate partner violence. J Am Coll Health. 2010;59:197-204.
21. Langhinrichsen-Rohlin J, Foubert JD, Brasfield H, Hill B, Shelley-Tremblay S. The men's program: does it impact college men's self-reported bystander efficacy and willingness to intervene? Violence Against Women. 2011;17:743-759.
22. Latane N, Darley JM. The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1970.
23. Coker AL, Cook-Craig PG, Williams CM, et al. Evaluation of green dot: an active bystander intervention to reduce sexual violence on college campuses Violence Against Women. 2011;17:1-20.
24. Kaiser HF. The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20:141-151.
25. Cattell RB. The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966;1:245-276.
26. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's Guide. 6th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2010.
27. Asparouhov T, Muthén B. Exploratory structural equation modeling. Struct Equ Modeling. 2009;16:397-438.
28. Marsh HW, Muthén B, Asparouhov T, et al. Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: application to students' evaluations of university teaching. Struct Equ Modeling. 2009;16:439-476.
29. Yu CY. Evaluating Cutoff Criteria of Model Fit Indices for Latent Varible Models With Binary and Continuous Outcomes [dissertation]. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles; 2002.
30. Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1-55.
31. Campbell JC, Manganello J. Changing public attitudes as a prevention strategy to reduce intimate partner violence. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2006;13:13-40.
32. Hamby SL. The who, what, when, where and how of partner violence prevention research. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2006;13:179-201. (Pubitemid 46005381)
33. O'Leary KD, Woodin EM, Fritz PAT. Can we prevent hitting? recommendations for preventing intimate partner violence between young adults. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2006;13:121-178. (Pubitemid 46005380)