Conducting research on the internet - A new era

Psychologist

Volumn 27, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 946-950

  Hewson, Claire ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939603821     PISSN: 09528229     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Arnett, J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602-614.
2. Barbeite, F.G. & Weiss, E.M. (2004). Computer self-efficacy and anxiety scales for an Internet sample. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(1), 1-15.
3. Barratt, M.J. (2012). The efficacy of interviewing young drug users through online chat. Drug and Alcohol Review, 31(4), 566-572.
4. Bordia, P. (1996). Studying verbal interaction on the internet. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 25, 149-151.
5. Bowker, N. & Tuffin, K. (2004). Using the online medium for discursive research about people with disabilities. Social Science Computer Review, 22(2), 228-241.
6. Brady, E. & Guerin, S. (2010) 'Not the romantic, all happy, coochy coo experience': A qualitative analysis of interactions on an Irish parenting web site. Family Relations, 59, 14-27.
7. British Psychological Society (2013). Ethics guidelines for conducting internet-mediated research. INF206/1.2013. Leicester: Author. Available at tinyurl.com/kumngbx
8. Brock, R.L., Barry, R.A., Lawrence, E. et al. (2012). Internet administration of paper-and-pencil questionnaires used in couple research. Assessment, 19(2), 226-242.
9. Brotsky, S.R. & Giles, D. (2007). Inside the 'pro-ana' community: A covert online participant observation. Eating Disorders, 15(2), 93-109.
10. Caro, F.G., Ho, T., McFadden, D. et al. (2012). Using the internet to administer more realistic vignette experiments. Social Science Computer Review, 30(2), 184-201.
11. DiNucci, D. (1999). Fragmented future. Print 53(4), 32.
12. Dutton, W.H. & Blank, G. (2011). Next generation users: The internet in Britain. Oxford Internet Surveys, University of Oxford. Retrieved 1 July 2014 from tinyurl.com/lg4dhpz
13. Gosling, S.D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S. & John, O.P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? American Psychologist, 59(2), 93-104.
14. Hanna, P. (2012). Using internet technologies (such as Skype) as a research medium: A research note. Qualitative Research, 12(2), 239-242.
15. Henrich, J., Heine, S.J. & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33, 61-135.
16. Hewson, C. (2003). Conducting research on the internet. The Psychologist, 16(6), 290-293.
17. Hewson, C. & Charlton, J.P. (2005). Measuring health beliefs on the internet. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 37(4), 691-702.
18. Hewson, C. & Laurent, D. (2008). Research design and tools for internet research. In N.G. Fielding, R.M. Lee & G. Blank (Eds.) The Sage handbook of online research methods. London: Sage.
19. Hewson, C., Laurent, D. & Vogel, C. (in press). Internet research methods: A practical guide for the behavioural and social sciences (2nd edn). London: Sage.
20. Hewson, C., Yule, P., Laurent, D. & Vogel, C. (2003). Internet research methods: A practical guide for the behavioural and social sciences. London: Sage.
21. Hogan, B. (2008). Analyzing social networks. In N.G. Fielding, R.M. Lee & G. Blank (Eds.) The Sage handbook of online research methods. London: Sage.
22. Horvath, K.J., Iantaffi, A., Grey, J.A. & Waiter, B. (2012). Hackers: Militants or merry pranksters? Health Communication, 27(5), 457-466.
23. Jones, P., Bunce, G., Evans, J. et al. (2008). Exploring space and place with walking interviews. Journal of Research Practice, 4(2), Article-D2. Available at http://jrp.icaap.org/ index.php/jrp/article/view/150
24. Keller, F., Gunasekharan, S., Mayo, N. & Corley, M. (2009). Timing accuracy of web experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 41(1), 1-12.
25. Linnman, C., Carlbring, P., Åhman, Å. et al. (2006). The Stroop effect on the internet. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(3), 448-455.
26. Malhotra, N. & Krosnick, J.A. (2007). The effect of survey mode and sampling on inferences about political attitudes and behavior. Political Analysis, 15(3), 286-323.
27. Mann, C. & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. London: Sage.
28. McCreanor, T., Lyons, A., Griffin, C. et al. (2013). Youth drinking cultures, social networking and alcohol marketing: Implications for public health. Critical Public Health, 23(1), 110-120.
29. Miller, P.G., Johnston, J., Dunn, M. et al. (2010). Comparing probability and non-probability sampling methods in ecstasy research. Substance Use & Misuse, 45, 437-450.
30. Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R. & Greenwald, A.G. (2002). E-research: Ethics, security, design and control in psychological research on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 161-176.
31. O'Connor, H. & Madge, C. (2003). 'Focus groups in cyberspace': Using the internet for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research, 6(2), 133-143.
32. O'Connor, H., Madge, C., Shaw, R. & Wellens, J. (2008). Internet-based interviewing. In N.G. Fielding, R.M. Lee & G. Blank (Eds.) The Sage handbook of online research methods. London: Sage.
33. Stewart, K. & Williams, M. (2005). Researching online populations. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 395-416.
34. Tonkin, E., Pfeiffer, H.D. & Tourte, G. (2012). Twitter, information sharing and the London riots? Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 38(2), 49-57.
35. Vehovar, V. & Manfreda, K.L. (2008). Overview: Online surveys. In N.G. Fielding, R.M. Lee & G. Blank (Eds.) The Sage handbook of online research methods. London: Sage.
36. Wallston, K.A. & Wallston, B.S. (1981). Health locus of control scales. In H.M. Lefcourt (Ed.) Research with the locus of control construct: Vol. 1. Assessment methods (pp.189-243). New York: Academic Press.
37. Yeager, D.S., Krosnick, J.A., Chang, L. et al. (2011). Comparing the accuracy of RDD telephone surveys and Internet surveys conducted with probability and non-probability samples. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(4), 709-747.
38. Yoo, J.H. & Kim, J. (2012). Obesity in the new media: A content analysis of obesity videos on YouTube. Health Communication, 27(1), 86-97.