Using the internet to administer more realistic vignette experiments

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 184-201

  Caro, Francis G ^a   Ho, Teck ^b   McFadden, Daniel ^c   Gottlieb, Alison S ^a   Yee, Christine ^c   Chan, Taizan ^d   Winter, Joachim ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c Workers Compensation Research Institute   (United States)

^d QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

fractional factorial surveys; Internet; older people; residential choices; stated choice methods; vignette

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860132390     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: 15528286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894439310391376     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Arber S.,McKinlay J.,Adams A.,Marceau L.,Link C.,O'Donnell A.Patient characteristics and inequalities in doctors' diagnostic and management strategies relating to CHD: A video-simulation experiment.Social Science & Medicine. 2006;62:103-115.
2. Cavanaugh G.,Fritzsche D.Using vignettes in business ethics research.Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy. 1985;7:279-293.
3. Dillman D.,Smyth J.,Christian L.Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. 2008). Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method3rd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.New York, NY: Wiley; 2008:.
4. Gottlieb A.,Sauder K.,Caro F.Residential adjustment of elders: Learning from experience with parents and peers.Journal of Housing for the Elderly. 2009;23:149-165.
5. Hogg R.,Tanis E.Probability and statistical inference. 2009). Probability and statistical inference8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2009:.
6. Kanninen B.Valuing environmental amenities using stated choice studies. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media; 2007:.
7. Louviere J.,Hensher D.,Swait J.Stated choice methods: Analysis and application. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2000:.
8. Mitchell R. C.,Carson R. T.Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resources to the Future; 1989:.
9. Mutchler J.,Burr J. A.Living arrangements among older persons: A multilevel analysis of housing market effects.Research on Aging. 2003;25:531-558.
10. Rossi P.,Anderson A.Measuring social judgments: The factorial survey approach. Rossi P.Nock S., ed. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE; 1982:.
11. Wason K.,Polonsky M.,Hyman M.Designing vignette studies in marketing.Australasian Marketing Journal. 2002;10:41-58.
12. Walters W. H.Types and patterns of later-life migration.Geografiska Annaler. 2000;82B:129-147.
13. Willis G.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2005:.
14. Woodward J.,Damon B.Housing characteristics: 2000. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau; 2000:.