Controlling Cell Geometry Affects the Spatial Distribution of Load Across Vinculin

Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 364-382

  Rothenberg, Katheryn E ^a   Neibart, Shane S ^a   LaCroix, Andrew S ^a   Hoffman, Brenton D ^a  

^a Duke University   (United States)

Author keywords

Focal adhesion; F rster Resonance Energy Transfer; Mechanotransduction; Micropatterning; Molecular tension sensor; Vinculin

Indexed keywords

COFILIN; VINCULIN;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; APOPTOSIS; ARTICLE; BIOENGINEERING; BIOSENSOR; CELL ADHESION; CELL DENSITY; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; EMBRYO; ENERGY TRANSFER; FIBROBLAST; FLUORESCENCE RESONANCE ENERGY TRANSFER; GEOMETRY; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; MICROENVIRONMENT; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PHOSPHORYLATION;

EID: 84939568052     PISSN: 18655025     EISSN: 18655033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12195-015-0404-9     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ai, H. W., J. N. Henderson, S. J. Remington, and R. E. Campbell. Directed evolution of a monomeric, bright and photostable version of clavularia cyan fluorescent protein: structural characterization and applications in fluorescence imaging. Biochem. J. 400:531–540, 2006.
2. Azioune, A., N. Carpi, Q. Tseng, M. Thery, and M. Piel. Protein micropatterns: a direct printing protocol using deep uvs. Method. Cell Biol. 97:133–146, 2010.
3. Azioune, A., M. Storch, M. Bornens, M. Thery, and M. Piel. Simple and rapid process for single cell micro-patterning. Lab Chip 9:1640–1642, 2009.
4. Bhadriraju, K., M. Yang, S. Alom Ruiz, D. Pirone, J. Tan, and C. S. Chen. Activation of rock by rhoa is regulated by cell adhesion, shape, and cytoskeletal tension. Exp. Cell Res. 313:3616–3623, 2007.
5. Blundell, J. R., and E. M. Terentjev. Buckling of semiflexible filaments under compression. Soft Matter 5:4015–4020, 2009.
6. Blundell, J. R., and E. M. Terentjev. Semiflexible filaments subject to arbitrary interactions: a metropolis monte carlo approach. Soft Matter 7:3967–3974, 2011.
7. Burnette, D. T., L. Shao, C. Ott, A. M. Pasapera, R. S. Fischer, M. A. Baird, C. Der Loughian, H. Delanoe-Ayari, M. J. Paszek, M. W. Davidson, E. Betzig, and J. Lippincott-Schwartz. A contractile and counterbalancing adhesion system controls the 3d shape of crawling cells. J. Cell Biol. 205:83–96, 2014.
8. Carisey, A., R. Tsang, A. M. Greiner, N. Nijenhuis, N. Heath, A. Nazgiewicz, R. Kemkemer, B. Derby, J. Spatz, and C. Ballestrem. Vinculin regulates the recruitment and release of core focal adhesion proteins in a force-dependent manner. Curr. Biol. 23:271–281, 2013.
9. Chang, C. W., and S. Kumar. Vinculin tension distributions of individual stress fibers within cell-matrix adhesions. J. Cell Sci. 126:3021–3030, 2013.
10. Chen, C. S. Mechanotransduction—a field pulling together? J. Cell Sci. 121:3285–3292, 2008.
11. Chen, C. S., J. L. Alonso, E. Ostuni, G. M. Whitesides, and D. E. Ingber. Cell shape provides global control of focal adhesion assembly. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 307:355–361, 2003.
12. Chen, H., D. M. Cohen, D. M. Choudhury, N. Kioka, and S. W. Craig. Spatial distribution and functional significance of activated vinculin in living cells. J. Cell Biol. 169:459–470, 2005.
13. Chen, H., H. L. Puhl, S. V. Koushik, S. S. Vogel, and S. R. Ikeda. Measurement of fret efficiency and ratio of donor to acceptor concentration in living cells. Biophys. J. 91:L39–L41, 2006.
14. Choi, C. K., M. Vicente-Manzanares, J. Zareno, L. A. Whitmore, A. Mogilner, and A. R. Horwitz. Actin and alpha-actinin orchestrate the assembly and maturation of nascent adhesions in a myosin ii motor-independent manner. Nat. Cell Biol. 10:1039–1050, 2008.
15. Davidson, P. M., O. Fromigue, P. J. Marie, V. Hasirci, G. Reiter, and K. Anselme. Topographically induced self-deformation of the nuclei of cells: dependence on cell type and proposed mechanisms. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 21:939–946, 2010.
16. del Alamo, J. C., R. Meili, B. Alvarez-Gonzalez, B. Alonso-Latorre, E. Bastounis, R. Firtel, and J. C. Lasheras. Three-dimensional quantification of cellular traction forces and mechanosensing of thin substrata by fourier traction force microscopy. PLoS ONE 8:e69850, 2013.
17. Dike, L. E., C. S. Chen, M. Mrksich, J. Tien, G. M. Whitesides, and D. E. Ingber. Geometric control of switching between growth, apoptosis, and differentiation during angiogenesis using micropatterned substrates. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 35:441–448, 1999.
18. Doyle, A. D., F. W. Wang, K. Matsumoto, and K. M. Yamada. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 184:481–490, 2009.
19. Dumbauld, D. W., T. T. Lee, A. Singh, J. Scrimgeour, C. A. Gersbach, E. A. Zamir, J. Fu, C. S. Chen, J. E. Curtis, S. W. Craig, and A. J. Garcia. How vinculin regulates force transmission. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:9788–9793, 2013.
20. Evers, T. H., E. M. W. M. van Dongen, A. C. Faesen, E. W. Meijer, and M. Merkx. Quantitative understanding of the energy transfer between fluorescent proteins connected via flexible peptide linkers. Biochemistry 45:13183–13192, 2006.
21. Franck, C., S. A. Maskarinec, D. A. Tirrell, and G. Ravichandran. Three-dimensional traction force microscopy: a new tool for quantifying cell-matrix interactions. PLoS ONE 6:e17833, 2011.
22. Gadhari, N., M. Charnley, M. Marelli, J. Brugger, and M. Chiquet. Cell shape-dependent early responses of fibroblasts to cyclic strain. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 3415–25:2013, 1833.
23. Grashoff, C., B. D. Hoffman, M. D. Brenner, R. Zhou, M. Parsons, M. T. Yang, M. A. McLean, S. G. Sligar, C. S. Chen, T. Ha, and M. A. Schwartz. Measuring mechanical tension across vinculin reveals regulation of focal adhesion dynamics. Nature 466:263–266, 2010.
24. Han, S. J., K. S. Bielawski, L. H. Ting, M. L. Rodriguez, and N. J. Sniadecki. Decoupling substrate stiffness, spread area, and micropost density: a close spatial relationship between traction forces and focal adhesions. Biophys. J. 103:640–648, 2012.
25. Hoffman, B. D., C. Grashoff, and M. A. Schwartz. Dynamic molecular processes mediate cellular mechanotransduction. Nature 475:316–323, 2011.
26. Holle, A. W., X. Tang, D. Vijayraghavan, L. G. Vincent, A. Fuhrmann, Y. S. Choi, J. C. del Alamo, and A. J. Engler. In situ mechanotransduction via vinculin regulates stem cell differentiation. Stem Cells 31:2467–2477, 2013.
27. Hur, S. S., Y. Zhao, Y. S. Li, E. Botvinick, and S. Chien. Live cells exert 3-dimensional traction forces on their substrata. Cell. Mol. Bioeng. 2:425–436, 2009.
28. Jain, N., K. V. Iyer, A. Kumar, and G. V. Shivashankar. Cell geometric constraints induce modular gene-expression patterns via redistribution of hdac3 regulated by actomyosin contractility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:11349–11354, 2013.
29. Joosen, L., M. A. Hink, T. W. J. Gadella, and J. Goedhart. Effect of fixation procedures on the fluorescence lifetimes of aequorea victoria derived fluorescent proteins. J. Microsc. 256:166–176, 2014.
30. Khatau, S. B., C. M. Hale, P. J. Stewart-Hutchinson, M. S. Patel, C. L. Stewart, P. C. Searson, D. Hodzic, and D. Wirtz. A perinuclear actin cap regulates nuclear shape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:19017–19022, 2009.
31. Kilian, K. A., B. Bugarija, B. T. Lahn, and M. Mrksich. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:4872–4877, 2010.
32. Kim, D. H., S. Cho, and D. Wirtz. Tight coupling between nucleus and cell migration through the perinuclear actin cap. J. Cell Sci. 127:2528–2541, 2014.
33. Kovacs, M., J. Toth, C. Hetenyi, A. Malnasi-Csizmadia, and J. R. Sellers. Mechanism of blebbistatin inhibition of myosin ii. J. Biol. Chem. 279:35557–35563, 2004.
34. LaCroix, A. S., K. E. Rothenberg, M. E. Berginski, A. N. Urs, and B. D. Hoffman. Construction, imaging, and analysis of fret-based tension sensors in living cells. Methods Cell Biol. 125:161–186, 2015.
35. Legant, W. R., C. K. Choi, J. S. Miller, L. Shao, L. Gao, E. Betzig, and C. S. Chen. Multidimensional traction force microscopy reveals out-of-plane rotational moments about focal adhesions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110:881–886, 2013.
36. Lemmon, C. A., and L. H. Romer. A predictive model of cell traction forces based on cell geometry. Biophys. J. 99:L78–L80, 2010.
37. Levin, M. Morphogenetic fields in embryogenesis, regeneration, and cancer: non-local control of complex patterning. Biosystems 109:243–261, 2012.
38. Li, Q. S., A. Kumar, E. Makhija, and G. V. Shivashankar. The regulation of dynamic mechanical coupling between actin cytoskeleton and nucleus by matrix geometry. Biomaterials 35:961–969, 2014.
39. Lou, S. S., A. Diz-Munoz, O. D. Weiner, D. A. Fletcher, and J. A. Theriot. Myosin light chain kinase regulates cell polarization independently of membrane tension or rho kinase. J. Cell Biol. 209:275–288, 2015.
40. Maekawa, M., T. Ishizaki, S. Boku, N. Watanabe, A. Fujita, A. Iwamatsu, T. Obinata, K. Ohashi, K. Mizuno, and S. Narumiya. Signaling from rho to the actin cytoskeleton through protein kinases rock and lim-kinase. Science 285:895–898, 1999.
41. Majumdar, Z. K., R. Hickerson, H. F. Noller, and R. M. Clegg. Measurements of internal distance changes of the 30 s ribosome using fret with multiple donor-acceptor pairs: quantitative spectroscopic methods. J. Mol. Biol. 351:1123–1145, 2005.
42. Maskarinec, S. A., C. Franck, D. A. Tirrell, and G. Ravichandran. Quantifying cellular traction forces in three dimensions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106:22108–22113, 2009.
43. McBeath, R., D. M. Pirone, C. M. Nelson, K. Bhadriraju, and C. S. Chen. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and rhoa regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev. Cell 6:483–495, 2004.
44. Meng, F., and F. Sachs. Orientation-based fret sensor for real-time imaging of cellular forces. J. Cell Sci. 125:743–750, 2012.
45. Mierke, C. T., P. Kollmannsberger, D. P. Zitterbart, G. Diez, T. M. Koch, S. Marg, W. H. Ziegler, W. H. Goldmann, and B. Fabry. Vinculin facilitates cell invasion into three-dimensional collagen matrices. J. Biol. Chem. 285:13121–13130, 2010.
46. Nagai, T., K. Ibata, E. S. Park, M. Kubota, K. Mikoshiba, and A. Miyawaki. A variant of yellow fluorescent protein with fast and efficient maturation for cell-biological applications. Nat. Biotechnol. 20:87–90, 2002.
47. Nelson, C. M., R. P. Jean, J. L. Tan, W. F. Liu, N. J. Sniadecki, A. A. Spector, and C. S. Chen. Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102:11594–11599, 2005.
48. Oakes, P. W., S. Banerjee, M. C. Marchetti, and M. L. Gardel. Geometry regulates traction stresses in adherent cells. Biophys. J. 107:825–833, 2014.
49. Paszek, M. J., C. C. DuFort, O. Rossier, R. Bainer, J. K. Mouw, K. Godula, J. E. Hudak, J. N. Lakins, A. C. Wijekoon, L. Cassereau, M. G. Rubashkin, M. J. Magbanua, K. S. Thorn, M. W. Davidson, H. S. Rugo, J. W. Park, D. A. Hammer, G. Giannone, C. R. Bertozzi, and V. M. Weaver. The cancer glycocalyx mechanically primes integrin-mediated growth and survival. Nature 511:319–325, 2014.
50. Rape, A. D., W. H. Guo, and Y. L. Wang. The regulation of traction force in relation to cell shape and focal adhesions. Biomaterials 32:2043–2051, 2011.
51. Shao, Y., J. M. Mann, W. Chen, and J. Fu. Global architecture of the f-actin cytoskeleton regulates cell shape-dependent endothelial mechanotransduction. Integr. Biol. (Camb.) 6:300–311, 2014.
52. Thery, M. Micropatterning as a tool to decipher cell morphogenesis and functions. J. Cell Sci. 123:4201–4213, 2010.
53. Thery, M., A. Pepin, E. Dressaire, Y. Chen, and M. Bornens. Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 63:341–355, 2006.
54. Totsukawa, G., Y. Wu, Y. Sasaki, D. J. Hartshorne, Y. Yamakita, S. Yamashiro, and F. Matsumura. Distinct roles of mlck and rock in the regulation of membrane protrusions and focal adhesion dynamics during cell migration of fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 164:427–439, 2004.
55. Versaevel, M., J. B. Braquenier, M. Riaz, T. Grevesse, J. Lantoine, and S. Gabriele. Super-resolution microscopy reveals linc complex recruitment at nuclear indentation sites. Sci. Rep. 4:7362, 2014.
56. Versaevel, M., T. Grevesse, and S. Gabriele. Spatial coordination between cell and nuclear shape within micropatterned endothelial cells. Nat. Commun. 3:671, 2012.
57. Vishavkarma, R., S. Raghavan, C. Kuyyamudi, A. Majumder, J. Dhawan and P. A. Pullarkat. Role of actin filaments in correlating nuclear shape and cell spreading. PLoS One 9, 2014.
58. Wang, N., E. Ostuni, G. M. Whitesides, and D. E. Ingber. Micropatterning tractional forces in living cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 52:97–106, 2002.
59. Zaidel-Bar, R., S. Itzkovitz, A. Ma’ayan, R. Iyengar, and B. Geiger. Functional atlas of the integrin adhesome. Nat. Cell Biol. 9:858–867, 2007.
60. Zamir, E., B. Z. Katz, S. Aota, K. M. Yamada, B. Geiger, and Z. Kam. Molecular diversity of cell-matrix adhesions. J. Cell Sci. 112:1655–1669, 1999.