Tumor growth prediction with reaction-diffusion and hyperelastic biomechanical model by physiological data fusion

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 72-85

  Wong, Ken C L ^a   Summers, Ronald M ^a   Kebebew, Electron ^b   Yao, Jianhua ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Derivative free optimization; Model personalization; Nonlinear solid mechanics; Physiological data fusion; Tumor growth prediction

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICS; DATA FUSION; DIFFUSION IN LIQUIDS; FORECASTING; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; HOSPITAL DATA PROCESSING; LINEAR EQUATIONS; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; NONLINEAR EQUATIONS; OPTIMIZATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TUMORS;

DERIVATIVE-FREE OPTIMIZATION; NONLINEAR SOLID MECHANICS; PERSONALIZATIONS; PHYSIOLOGICAL DATA; TUMOR GROWTH;

PHYSIOLOGICAL MODELS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIFFUSION; ELASTICITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MIDDLE AGED; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; PANCREATIC NEUROENDOCRINE TUMOR; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION ANALYSIS; TUMOR GROWTH; TUMOR VOLUME; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; NEOPLASM; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT;

ALGORITHMS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CONTRAST MEDIA; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84939470688     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2015.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Alarcón T., Byrne H.M., Maini P.K. A cellular automaton model for tumour growth in inhomogeneous environment. J. Theor. Biol. 2003, 225(2):257-274.
2. Ambrosi D., Mollica F. On the mechanics of a growing tumor. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2002, 40(12):1297-1316.
3. Bae K.T. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: Considerations and approaches. Radiology 2010, 256(1):32-61.
4. Bathe K.J. Finite Element Procedures 1996, Prentice Hall.
5. Been L.B., Suurmeijer A.J.H., Cobben D.C.P., Jager P.L., Hoekstra H.J., Elsinga P.H. [18F] FLT-PET in oncology: Current status and opportunities. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imag. 2004, 31(12):1659-1672.
6. Blansfield J.A., Choyke L., Morita S.Y., Choyke P.L., Pingpank J.F., Alexander H.R., et al. Clinical, genetic and radiographic analysis of 108 patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) manifested by pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Surgery 2007, 142(6):814-818.e2.
7. Byrne H.M. Dissecting cancer through mathematics: from the cell to the animal model. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10(3):221-230.
8. Chen X., Summers R.M., Yao J. Kidney tumor growth prediction by coupling reaction-diffusion and biomechanical model. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2013, 60(1):169-173.
9. Clatz O., Sermesant M., Bondiau P.-Y., Delingette H., Warfield S.K., Malandain G., Ayache N. Realistic simulation of the 3D growth of brain tumors in MR images coupling diffusion with biomechanical deformation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2005, 24(10):1334-1346.
10. Clayton T.A., Lindon J.C., Cloarec O., Antti H., Charuel C., Hanton G., et al. Pharmaco-metabonomic phenotyping and personalized drug treatment. Nature 2006, 440(7087):1073-1077.
11. Conn A.R., Scheinberg K., Vicente L.N. Introduction to Derivative-Free Optimization 2009, Vol. 8. SIAM.
12. Ehehalt F., Saeger H.D., Schmidt C.M., Grützmann R. Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas. Oncologist 2009, 14(5):456-467.
13. Fang Q., Boas D.A. Tetrahedral mesh generation from volumetric binary and grayscale images. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2009 2009, 1142-1145.
14. Friedl P., Locker J., Sahai E., Segall J.E. Classifying collective cancer cell invasion. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14(8):777-783.
15. Fung Y.C. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues 1993, Springer-Verlag. 2nd ed.
16. Gablonsky J.M., Kelley C.T. A locally-biased form of the DIRECT algorithm. J. Global Optim. 2001, 21(1):27-37.
17. Gatenby R.A., Gawlinski E.T. A reaction-diffusion model of cancer invasion. Cancer Res. 1996, 56:5745-5753.
18. Germann W.J., Stanfield C.L. Principles of Human Physiology 2005, Pearson Benjamin Cummings.
19. Graziano L., Preziosi L. Mechanics in tumor growth. Modeling of Biological Materials 2007, 263-321. Birkhäuser Boston.
20. Hamamci A., Kucuk N., Karaman K., Engin K., Unal G. Tumor-cut: Segmentation of brain tumors on contrast enhanced MR images for radiosurgery applications. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2012, 31(3):790-804.
21. Han D., Bayouth J., Song Q., Taurani A., Sonka M., Buatti J., Wu X. Globally optimal tumor segmentation in PET-CT images: A graph-based co-segmentation method. Information Processing in Medical Imaging 2011, 245-256. Springer.
22. Hogea C., Davatzikos C., Biros G. An image-driven parameter estimation problem for a reaction-diffusion glioma growth model with mass effects. J. Math. Biol. 2008, 56(6):793-825.
23. Holzapfel G.A. Nonlinear Solid Mechanics: A Continuum Approach for Engineering 2000, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
24. Jiang Y., Pjesivac-Grbovic J., Cantrell C., Freyer J.P. A multiscale model for avascular tumor growth. Biophys. J. 2005, 89(6):3884-3894.
25. Kam Y., Rejniak K.A., Anderson A.R. Cellular modeling of cancer invasion: integration of in silico and in vitro approaches. J. Cell Physiol. 2012, 227(2):431-438.
26. Kazanjian K.K., Reber H.A., Hines O.J. Resection of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: results of 70 cases. Arch. Surg. 2006, 141(8):765-770.
27. Kelloff G., Hoffman J.M., Johnson B., Scher H.I., Siegel B.A., Cheng E.Y., et al. Progress and promise of FDG-PET imaging for cancer patient management and oncologic drug development. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005, 11(8):2785-2808.
28. Konukoglu E., Clatz O., Menze B.H., Stieltjes B., Weber M.-A., Mandonnet E., et al. Image guided personalization of reaction-diffusion type tumor growth models using modified anisotropic eikonal equations. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2010, 29(1):77-95.
29. Kormano M., Dean P.B. Extravascular contrast material: the major component of contrast enhancement. Radiology 1976, 121(2):379-382.
30. Kyriacou S.K., Davatzikos C., Zinreich S.J., Bryan R.N. Nonlinear elastic registration of brain images with tumor pathology using a biomechanical model. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 1999, 18(7):580-592.
31. Liu Y., Sadowski S., Weisbrod A., Kebebew E., Summers R., Yao J. Patient specific tumor growth prediction using multimodal images. Med. Image Anal. 2014, 18(3):555-566.
32. Marino S., Hogue I.B., Ray C.J., Kirschner D.E. A methodology for performing global uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in systems biology. J. Theor. Biol. 2008, 254(1):178-196.
33. Massoptier L., Casciaro S. A new fully automatic and robust algorithm for fast segmentation of liver tissue and tumors from CT scans. European Radiology 2008, 18(8):1658-1665.
34. Menze B.H., Van Leemput K., Honkela A., Konukoglu E., Weber M.-A., Ayache N., et al. A generative approach for image-based modeling of tumor growth. Information Processing in Medical Imaging 2011, 735-747. Springer.
35. Menzel A., Kuhl E. Frontiers in growth and remodeling. Mech. Res. Commun. 2012, 42:1-14.
36. Miles K.A. Tumour angiogenesis and its relation to contrast enhancement on computed tomography: A review. Eur. J. Radiol. 1999, 30(3):198-205.
37. Nacif M.S., Kawel N., Lee J.J., Chen X., Yao J., Zavodni A., et al. Interstitial myocardial fibrosis assessed as extracellular volume fraction with low-radiation-dose cardiac CT. Radiology 2012, 264(3):876-883.
38. Nelder J.A., Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput. J. 1965, 7(4):308-313.
39. Pluim J.P.W., Maintz J.B.A., Viergever M.A. Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: A survey. IEEE Trans. Med. Imag. 2003, 22(8):986-1004.
40. Powell M.J.D. The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives. Cambridge NA Report NA2009/06 2009, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
41. Rao S.S. Engineering Optimization: Theory and Practice 2009, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
42. 2007, National Cancer Institute, SEER Program, NIH. L.A.G. Ries, J.L. Young, G.E. Keel, M.P. Eisner, Y.D. Lin, M.J. Horner (Eds.).
43. Rogers J.M., McCulloch A.D. A collocation-Galerkin finite element model of cardiac action potential propagation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 1994, 41(8):743-757.
44. Rowan T. Functional Stability Analysis of Numerical Algorithms Ph.D. thesis 1990, University of Texas at Austin.
45. Sadato N., Tsuchida T., Nakaumra S., Waki A., Uematsu H., Takahashi N., et al. Non-invasive estimation of the net influx constant using the standardized uptake value for quantification of FDG uptake of tumours. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. 1998, 25(6):559-564.
46. Schilsky R.L. Personalized medicine in oncology: The future is now. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9(5):363-366.
47. Stylianopoulos T., Martin J.D., Chauhan V.P., Jain S.R., Diop-Frimpong B., Bardeesy N., et al. Causes, consequences, and remedies for growth-induced solid stress in murine and human tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109(38):15101-15108.
48. Thie J.A. Understanding the standardized uptake value, its methods, and implications for usage. J. Nucl. Med. 2004, 45(9):1431-1434.
49. West G.B., Brown J.H., Enquist B.J. A general model for ontogenetic growth. Nature 2001, 413(6856):628-631.
50. Yushkevich P.A., Piven J., Hazlett H.C., Smith R.G., Ho S., Gee J.C., et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage 2006, 31(3):1116-1128.