Differences between information in registries and articles did not influence publication acceptance

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 68, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1059-1067

  Van Lent, Marlies ^a   Inthout, Joanna ^a   Out, Henk Jan ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b Teva Pharmaceuticals Europe BV   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Drug trials; Editorial decision making; Industry sponsorship; Peer review; Selective reporting; Trial registration

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REGISTER; BIBLIOMETRICS; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); DECISION MAKING; DRUG INDUSTRY; PUBLISHING; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

BIBLIOMETRICS; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; DECISION MAKING; DRUG INDUSTRY; EDITORIAL POLICIES; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; REGISTRIES;

EID: 84939465195     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.019     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. K. Dickersin, and D. Rennie The evolution of trial registries and their use to assess the clinical trial enterprise JAMA 307 2012 1861 1864
2. C.D. DeAngelis, J.M. Drazen, F.A. Frizelle, C. Haug, J. Hoey, R. Horton, and et al. Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors JAMA 292 2004 1363 1364
3. F. Kunath, H.R. Grobe, B. Keck, G. Rucker, B. Wullich, G. Antes, and et al. Do urology journals enforce trial registration? A cross-sectional study of published trials BMJ Open 1 2 2011 e000430
4. Consensus statement on mandatory registration of clinical trials Ann Surg 245 4 2007 505 506
5. J.J. Meerpohl, R.F. Wolff, C.M. Niemeyer, G. Antes, and E. von Elm Editorial policies of pediatric journals: survey of instructions for authors Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 164 3 2010 268 272
6. H. Knuppel, C. Metz, J.J. Meerpohl, and D. Strech How psychiatry journals support the unbiased translation of clinical research. A cross-sectional study of editorial policies PLoS One 8 10 2013 e75995
7. K. Dwan, D.G. Altman, L. Cresswell, M. Blundell, C.L. Gamble, and P.R. Williamson Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trials Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 MR000031
8. S. Mathieu, I. Boutron, D. Moher, D.G. Altman, and P. Ravaud Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials JAMA 302 2009 977 984
9. G. Hannink, H.G. Gooszen, and M.M. Rovers Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions Ann Surg 257 5 2013 818 823
10. R. Ewart, H. Lausen, and N. Millian Undisclosed changes in outcomes in randomized controlled trials: an observational study Ann Fam Med 7 6 2009 542 546
11. M. Huic, M. Marusic, and A. Marusic Completeness and changes in registered data and reporting bias of randomized controlled trials in ICMJE journals after trial registration policy PLoS One 6 9 2011 e25258
12. P. Charles, B. Giraudeau, A. Dechartres, G. Baron, and P. Ravaud Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review BMJ 338 2009 b1732
13. V. Anand, D.C. Scales, C.S. Parshuram, and B.P. Kavanagh Registration and design alterations of clinical trials in critical care: a cross-sectional observational study Intensive Care Med 40 2014 700 722
14. E. Wager, P. Williams on behalf of the OPEN Project (Overcome failure to Publish nEgative fiNdings) Consortium "Hardly worth the effort"? Medical journals' policies and their editors' and publishers' views on trial registration and publication bias: quantitative and qualitative study BMJ 347 2013 f5248
15. S. Mathieu, A.W. Chan, and P. Ravaud Use of trial register information during the peer review process PLoS One 8 4 2013 e59910
16. M. van Lent, J. Overbeke, and H.J. Out Role of editorial and peer review processes in publication bias: analysis of drug trials submitted to eight medical journals PLoS One 9 8 2014 e104846
17. M. van Lent, J. Overbeke, and H.J. Out Recommendations for a uniform assessment of publication bias related to funding source BMC Med Res Methodol 13 2013 120
18. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals 2013 Available at: http://www.icmje.org/icmje-recommendations.pdf Accessed November 13, 2014
19. S. Ramagopalan, A. Skingsley, L. Handunnetthi, M. Klingel, D. Magnus, J. Pakpoor, and et al. Prevalence of primary outcome changes in clinical trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: a cross-sectional study F1000Res 3 2014
20. A.W. Chan, A. Hrobjartsson, M.T. Haahr, P.C. Gotzsche, and D.G. Altman Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles JAMA 291 2004 2457 2465
21. L. Damen, F. van Agt, T. de Boo, and F. Huysmans Terminating clinical trials without sufficient subjects J Med Ethics 38 2012 413 416
22. B.G. Sully, S.A. Julious, and J. Nicholl A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies Trials 14 2013 166
23. L. Reveiz, K. Krleza-Jeric, A.W. Chan, and S. de Aguiar Do trialists endorse clinical trial registration? Survey of a PubMed sample Trials 8 2007 30
24. R.F. Viergever, G. Karam, A. Reis, and D. Ghersi The quality of registration of clinical trials: still a problem PLoS One 9 1 2014 e84727
25. J.S. Ross, G.K. Mulvey, E.M. Hines, S.E. Nissen, and H.M. Krumholz Trial publication after registration in ClinicalTrials.Gov: a cross-sectional analysis PloS Med 6 2009 e1000144
26. R.M. Califf, D.A. Zarin, J.M. Kramer, R.E. Sherman, L.H. Aberle, and A. Tasneem Characteristics of clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, 2007-2010 JAMA 307 2012 1838 1847
27. J.E. Becker, H.M. Krumholz, G. Ben-Josef, and J.S. Ross Reporting of results in ClinicalTrials.gov and high-impact journals JAMA 311 2014 1063 1065
28. D.M. Hartung, D.A. Zarin, J.M. Guise, M. McDonagh, R. Paynter, and M. Helfand Reporting discrepancies between the ClinicalTrials.gov results database and peer-reviewed publications Ann Intern Med 160 2014 477 483
29. D.A. Zarin, T. Tse, and N.C. Ide Trial registration at ClinicalTrials.gov between May and October 2005 N Engl J Med 353 2005 2779 2787