-
1
-
-
0035901579
-
The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. The CONSORT Group
-
Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, et al. (2001) The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. The CONSORT Group. Ann Intern Med 134: 663-694.
-
(2001)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.134
, pp. 663-694
-
-
Altman, D.G.1
Schulz, K.F.2
Moher, D.3
Egger, M.4
Davidoff, F.5
-
2
-
-
0035822324
-
Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
-
Juni P, Altman DG, Egger M, (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ 323: 42-46.
-
(2001)
BMJ
, vol.323
, pp. 42-46
-
-
Juni, P.1
Altman, D.G.2
Egger, M.3
-
3
-
-
85047692188
-
Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials
-
Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG, (1995) Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 273: 408-412.
-
(1995)
JAMA
, vol.273
, pp. 408-412
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Chalmers, I.2
Hayes, R.J.3
Altman, D.G.4
-
4
-
-
0032542553
-
Users' guides to the medical literature: XIV. How to decide on the applicability of clinical trial results to your patient. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group
-
Dans AL, Dans LF, Guyatt GH, Richardson S, (1998) Users' guides to the medical literature: XIV. How to decide on the applicability of clinical trial results to your patient. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 279: 545-549.
-
(1998)
JAMA
, vol.279
, pp. 545-549
-
-
Dans, A.L.1
Dans, L.F.2
Guyatt, G.H.3
Richardson, S.4
-
5
-
-
0023887476
-
An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment
-
Laupacis A, Sackett DL, Roberts RS, (1988) An assessment of clinically useful measures of the consequences of treatment. N Engl J Med 318: 1728-1733.
-
(1988)
N Engl J Med
, vol.318
, pp. 1728-1733
-
-
Laupacis, A.1
Sackett, D.L.2
Roberts, R.S.3
-
6
-
-
0038777090
-
Evidence b(i)ased medicine-selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications
-
Melander H, Ahlqvist-Rastad J, Meijer G, Beermann B, (2003) Evidence b(i)ased medicine-selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications. BMJ 326: 1171-1173.
-
(2003)
BMJ
, vol.326
, pp. 1171-1173
-
-
Melander, H.1
Ahlqvist-Rastad, J.2
Meijer, G.3
Beermann, B.4
-
7
-
-
33746106098
-
Ethical issues in psychopharmacology
-
McHenry L, (2006) Ethical issues in psychopharmacology. J Med Ethics 32: 405-410.
-
(2006)
J Med Ethics
, vol.32
, pp. 405-410
-
-
McHenry, L.1
-
8
-
-
1942468862
-
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data
-
Whittington CJ, Kendall T, Fonagy P, Cottrell D, Cotgrove A, et al. (2004) Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in childhood depression: systematic review of published versus unpublished data. Lancet 363: 1341-1345.
-
(2004)
Lancet
, vol.363
, pp. 1341-1345
-
-
Whittington, C.J.1
Kendall, T.2
Fonagy, P.3
Cottrell, D.4
Cotgrove, A.5
-
9
-
-
38349049478
-
Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy
-
Turner EH, Matthews AM, Linardatos E, Tell RA, Rosenthal R, (2008) Selective publication of antidepressant trials and its influence on apparent efficacy. N Engl J Med 358: 252-260.
-
(2008)
N Engl J Med
, vol.358
, pp. 252-260
-
-
Turner, E.H.1
Matthews, A.M.2
Linardatos, E.3
Tell, R.A.4
Rosenthal, R.5
-
10
-
-
79956199374
-
Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review
-
Moher D, Weeks L, Ocampo M, Seely D, Sampson M, et al. (2011) Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol 64: 718-742.
-
(2011)
J Clin Epidemiol
, vol.64
, pp. 718-742
-
-
Moher, D.1
Weeks, L.2
Ocampo, M.3
Seely, D.4
Sampson, M.5
-
11
-
-
0035906286
-
Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation
-
Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L, (2001) Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA 285: 1992-1995.
-
(2001)
JAMA
, vol.285
, pp. 1992-1995
-
-
Moher, D.1
Jones, A.2
Lepage, L.3
-
12
-
-
77950273246
-
CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
-
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, et al. (2010) CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340: c869.
-
(2010)
BMJ
, vol.340
-
-
Moher, D.1
Hopewell, S.2
Schulz, K.F.3
Montori, V.4
Gotzsche, P.C.5
-
13
-
-
84861374488
-
From an ethics of rationing to an ethics of waste avoidance
-
Brody H, (2012) From an ethics of rationing to an ethics of waste avoidance. The New England Journal of Medicine 366: 1949-1951.
-
(2012)
The New England Journal of Medicine
, vol.366
, pp. 1949-1951
-
-
Brody, H.1
-
14
-
-
35848948166
-
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
-
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, et al. (2007) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147: 573-577.
-
(2007)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.147
, pp. 573-577
-
-
von Elm, E.1
Altman, D.G.2
Egger, M.3
Pocock, S.J.4
Gotzsche, P.C.5
-
15
-
-
0034685429
-
Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group
-
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, et al. (2000) Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 283: 2008-2012.
-
(2000)
JAMA
, vol.283
, pp. 2008-2012
-
-
Stroup, D.F.1
Berlin, J.A.2
Morton, S.C.3
Olkin, I.4
Williamson, G.D.5
-
16
-
-
68049122102
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
-
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6: e1000097.
-
(2009)
PLoS Med
, vol.6
-
-
Moher, D.1
Liberati, A.2
Tetzlaff, J.3
Altman, D.G.4
-
17
-
-
79955564994
-
Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review
-
Strech D, Soltmann B, Weikert B, Bauer M, Pfennig A, (2011) Quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials of pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorders: a systematic review. The Journal of clinical psychiatry 72: 1214-1221.
-
(2011)
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
, vol.72
, pp. 1214-1221
-
-
Strech, D.1
Soltmann, B.2
Weikert, B.3
Bauer, M.4
Pfennig, A.5
-
18
-
-
84863114432
-
[Quality of reporting in studies on bipolar disorders: implications for the development of guidelines]
-
Soltmann B, Pfennig A, Weikert B, Bauer M, Strech D, (2012) [Quality of reporting in studies on bipolar disorders: implications for the development of guidelines]. Nervenarzt 83: 604-617.
-
(2012)
Nervenarzt
, vol.83
, pp. 604-617
-
-
Soltmann, B.1
Pfennig, A.2
Weikert, B.3
Bauer, M.4
Strech, D.5
-
19
-
-
0032585240
-
Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years
-
Thornley B, Adams C, (1998) Content and quality of 2000 controlled trials in schizophrenia over 50 years. BMJ 317: 1181-1184.
-
(1998)
BMJ
, vol.317
, pp. 1181-1184
-
-
Thornley, B.1
Adams, C.2
-
20
-
-
34447530518
-
Relationship between quality of reports of antidepressant randomized controlled trials and treatment estimates: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis
-
Cipriani A, Malvini L, Furukawa TA, Barbui C, (2007) Relationship between quality of reports of antidepressant randomized controlled trials and treatment estimates: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis. J Clin Psychopharmacol 27: 352-356.
-
(2007)
J Clin Psychopharmacol
, vol.27
, pp. 352-356
-
-
Cipriani, A.1
Malvini, L.2
Furukawa, T.A.3
Barbui, C.4
-
21
-
-
60249093215
-
The impact of the CONSORT statement on reporting of randomized clinical trials in psychiatry
-
Han C, Kwak KP, Marks DM, Pae CU, Wu LT, et al. (2009) The impact of the CONSORT statement on reporting of randomized clinical trials in psychiatry. Contemp Clin Trials 30: 116-122.
-
(2009)
Contemp Clin Trials
, vol.30
, pp. 116-122
-
-
Han, C.1
Kwak, K.P.2
Marks, D.M.3
Pae, C.U.4
Wu, L.T.5
-
22
-
-
0030620460
-
How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data
-
Dickersin K, (1997) How important is publication bias? A synthesis of available data. AIDS Educ Prev 9: 15-21.
-
(1997)
AIDS Educ Prev
, vol.9
, pp. 15-21
-
-
Dickersin, K.1
-
23
-
-
2442692780
-
Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles
-
Chan AW, Hrobjartsson A, Haahr MT, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, (2004) Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles. JAMA 291: 2457-2465.
-
(2004)
JAMA
, vol.291
, pp. 2457-2465
-
-
Chan, A.W.1
Hrobjartsson, A.2
Haahr, M.T.3
Gotzsche, P.C.4
Altman, D.G.5
-
24
-
-
56749166123
-
Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: review of publication and presentation
-
discussion e217
-
Rising K, Bacchetti P, Bero L (2008) Reporting bias in drug trials submitted to the Food and Drug Administration: review of publication and presentation. PLoS Med 5: e217; discussion e217.
-
(2008)
PLoS Med
, vol.5
-
-
Rising, K.1
Bacchetti, P.2
Bero, L.3
-
25
-
-
34548012195
-
Institutional review boards should require clinical trial registration
-
Levin LA, Palmer JG, (2007) Institutional review boards should require clinical trial registration. Arch Intern Med 167: 1576-1580.
-
(2007)
Arch Intern Med
, vol.167
, pp. 1576-1580
-
-
Levin, L.A.1
Palmer, J.G.2
-
26
-
-
4644352071
-
Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
-
De Angelis C, Drazen JM, Frizelle FA, Haug C, Hoey J, et al. (2004) Clinical trial registration: a statement from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Ann Intern Med 141: 477-478.
-
(2004)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.141
, pp. 477-478
-
-
De Angelis, C.1
Drazen, J.M.2
Frizelle, F.A.3
Haug, C.4
Hoey, J.5
-
27
-
-
0038455700
-
Registering clinical trials
-
Dickersin K, Rennie D, (2003) Registering clinical trials. JAMA 290: 516-523.
-
(2003)
JAMA
, vol.290
, pp. 516-523
-
-
Dickersin, K.1
Rennie, D.2
-
29
-
-
18444382649
-
Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors
-
Altman DG, (2005) Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors. BMJ 330: 1056-1057.
-
(2005)
BMJ
, vol.330
, pp. 1056-1057
-
-
Altman, D.G.1
-
30
-
-
43049107191
-
Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors
-
Hopewell S, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF, (2008) Endorsement of the CONSORT Statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'Instructions to Authors'. Trials 9: 20.
-
(2008)
Trials
, vol.9
, pp. 20
-
-
Hopewell, S.1
Altman, D.G.2
Moher, D.3
Schulz, K.F.4
-
31
-
-
84856422763
-
Do journals publishing in the field of urology endorse reporting guidelines? A survey of author instructions
-
Kunath F, Grobe HR, Rucker G, Engehausen D, Antes G, et al. (2012) Do journals publishing in the field of urology endorse reporting guidelines? A survey of author instructions. Urologia internationalis 88: 54-59.
-
(2012)
Urologia Internationalis
, vol.88
, pp. 54-59
-
-
Kunath, F.1
Grobe, H.R.2
Rucker, G.3
Engehausen, D.4
Antes, G.5
-
32
-
-
77950265838
-
Editorial policies of pediatric journals: survey of instructions for authors
-
Meerpohl JJ, Wolff RF, Niemeyer CM, Antes G, von Elm E, (2010) Editorial policies of pediatric journals: survey of instructions for authors. Archives of pediatrics & adolescent medicine 164: 268-272.
-
(2010)
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
, vol.164
, pp. 268-272
-
-
Meerpohl, J.J.1
Wolff, R.F.2
Niemeyer, C.M.3
Antes, G.4
von Elm, E.5
-
33
-
-
79953740891
-
Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions
-
Meerpohl JJ, Wolff RF, Antes G, von Elm E, (2011) Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions. BMC Pediatr 11: 27.
-
(2011)
BMC Pediatr
, vol.11
, pp. 27
-
-
Meerpohl, J.J.1
Wolff, R.F.2
Antes, G.3
von Elm, E.4
-
34
-
-
84855482620
-
Do urology journals enforce trial registration? A cross-sectional study of published trials
-
Kunath F, Grobe HR, Keck B, Rucker G, Wullich B, et al. (2011) Do urology journals enforce trial registration? A cross-sectional study of published trials. BMJ open 1: e000430.
-
(2011)
BMJ Open
, vol.1
-
-
Kunath, F.1
Grobe, H.R.2
Keck, B.3
Rucker, G.4
Wullich, B.5
-
36
-
-
84855984672
-
Normative arguments and new solutions for the unbiased registration and publication of clinical trials
-
Strech D, (2012) Normative arguments and new solutions for the unbiased registration and publication of clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 65: 276-281.
-
(2012)
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
, vol.65
, pp. 276-281
-
-
Strech, D.1
|