Using technology to enhance nurse practitioner student engagement

Nurse Practitioner

Volumn 40, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 47-54

  Carley, Annette ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Education technology; NP education; Nurse practitioner student engagement

Indexed keywords

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMAN; NURSE PRACTITIONER; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING STUDENT; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; HUMANS; NURSE PRACTITIONERS; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 84939457832     PISSN: 03611817     EISSN: 15388662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.NPR.0000465119.04536.0e     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Field of Dreams. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097351.
2. Belcher AE. Translation of evidence for education. In: White KM, Dudley-Brown S, eds. Translation of Evidence Into Nursing and Health Care Practice. Springer Publishing Company; 2011.
3. Brandon AF, All AC. Constructivism theory analysis and application to curricula. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2010;31(2):89-92.
4. De Gagne JC. The impact of clickers in nursing education: a review of literature. Nurse Educ Today. 2011;31(8):e34-e40.
5. Cullen D, Stiffler D, Settles J, Pesut DJ. A database for nurse practitioner clinical education. Comput Inform Nurs. 2010;28(1):20-29.
6. National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF). Nurse Practitioner Core Competencies. 2012. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.nonpf.org/resource/resmgr/competencies/npcorecompetenciesfinal2012.pdf.
7. McNelis AM, Horton-Deutsch S, Friesth BM. Improving quality and safety in graduate education using an electronic student tracking system. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2012;26(5):358-363.
8. Revell SM, McCurry MK. Engaging millennial learners: effectiveness of personal response system technology with nursing students in small and large classrooms. J Nurs Educ. 2010;49(5):272-275.
9. Mareno N, Bremner M, Emerson C. The use of audience response systems in nursing education: best practice guidelines. Int J Nurs Educ Scholarsh. 2010;7: Article32.
10. Montenery SM, Walker M, Sorensen E, et al. Millennial generation student nurses' perceptions of the impact of multiple technologies on learning. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2013;34(6):405-409.
11. Woolforde L, Lopez-Zang D. Transforming engagement in learning through innovative technologies: using an audience response system in nursing orientation. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2012;43(3):102-103.
12. Hart L. Web conferencing in online classrooms. Nurse Educ. 2014;39(4):158-159.
13. Buckley KM, Rietschel M. Training and instructional strategies for the use of web conferencing in nursing education. Comput Inform Nurs. 2012;30(11):569-576.
14. Revaitis M, Egger S. FaceTime: a virtual pathway between research and practice. Nurse Educ. 2013;38(5):186-187.
15. Culley JM, Polyakova-Norwood V. Synchronous online role play for enhancing community, collaboration, and oral presentation proficiency. Nurs Educ Perspect. 2012;33(1):51-54.
16. Hayden EM, Navedo DD, Gordon JA. Web-conferenced simulation sessions: a satisfaction survey of clinical simulation encounters via remote supervision. Telemed JEHealth. 2012;18(7):525-529.
17. National Organization of Nurse Practitioner Faculties (NONPF). Clinical education issues in preparing nurse practitioner students for independent practice: an ongoing series of papers. Paper no. 4. Simulation in the context of clinical education. http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.nonpf.org/resource/resmgr/imported/clinicaleducationissuespprfinalapril2010.pdf.
18. Van Schaik SM, Plant J, Diane S, Tsang L, O'Sullivan P. Interprofessional team training in pediatric resuscitation: a low-cost, in situ simulation program that enhances self-efficacy among participants. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011;50(9):807-815.
19. Pittman OA. The use of simulation with advanced practice nursing students. J Amer Acad of Nurs Pract. 2012;24(9):516-20.
20. Cates LA, Wilson D. Acquisition and maintenance of competencies through simulation for neonatal nurse practitioners: beyond the basics. Adv Neonatal Care. 2011;11(5):321-327.
21. Anderson JK, Page AM, Wendorf DM. Avatar-assisted case studies. Nurse Educ. 2013;38(3):106-109.
22. Gonzalez L, Fenske CL. Use of a virtual community to contextualize learning activities. J Nurs Educ. 2012;51(1):38-41.
23. Caplan W, Myrick F, Smitten J, Kelly W. What a tangled web we weave: how technology is reshaping pedagogy. Nurse Educ Today. 2014;34(8):1172-1174.
24. Adelman DS, Nogueras DJ. Discussion boards: boring no more! Nurse Educ. 2013;38(1):30-33.
25. Johnson G, Flagler S. Web-based unfolding cases: a strategy to enhance and evaluate clinical reasoning skills. J Nurs Educ. 2013;52(10):589-592.
26. Green J, Wyllie A, Jackson D. Electronic portfolios in nursing education: a review of the literature. Nurse Educ Pract. 2014;14(1):4-8.
27. Billings DM. Wikis and blogs: consider the possibilities for continuing nursing education. J Contin Educ Nurs. 2009;40(12):534-535.
28. Steinemann SK, Berg BW, Turban JW, Hara KM, Alfrey LR. Student-written simulation scenarios: a novel cognitive assessment method in a trauma curriculum. Hawaii Med J. 2011;70(8):172-175.
29. Peck JL. Social media in nursing education: responsible integration for meaningful use. J Nurs Educ. 2014;53(3):164-169.