Assessing relative importance and mutual influence of barriers for CCS deployment of the ROAD project using AHP and DEMATEL methods

International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control

Volumn 41, Issue , 2015, Pages 336-357

  Sara, Juliana ^a   Stikkelman, Rob M ^a   Herder, Paulien M ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); Carbon capture and storage (CCS); Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL); Demonstration; ROAD

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; CARBON DIOXIDE; DECISION MAKING; DEMONSTRATIONS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; HIGHWAY PLANNING; ROADS AND STREETS; SURVEYS;

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP); CARBON CAPTURE AND STORAGES (CCS); DECISION MAKING TRIAL AND EVALUATION LABORATORIES; DEMATEL METHODS; FINANCIAL INCENTIVES; POLICY MAKERS; POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS; ROAD;

CARBON CAPTURE;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; ASSESSMENT METHOD; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; DECISION MAKING; POLICY MAKING;

NETHERLANDS;

EID: 84939450212     PISSN: 17505836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.07.008     Document Type: Review

References (106)

1. 2 Price of $32 Needed to Curb Warming, Study Shows 2014, 〈http://phys.org/news/2014-06-minimum-co2-price-curb.html, [WWW Document].
2. 2) 2013, 204-223. Woodhead Publising Limited, Cambridge. J. Gluyas, S. Mathias (Eds.).
3. Bahurmoz A. The analytic hierarchy process: a methodology for win-win management. Econ. Admin. J. 2006, 20:3-16.
4. Burgess C. Issues of liability during the post- abandonment phase of carbon capture and storage. CURRENT 2010, 14:71-86.
5. Byun D.-H. The AHP approach for selecting an automobile purchase model. Inf. Manage. 2001, 38:289-297.
6. Carnegie-Mellon Carbon Capture and Sequestration: Framing the Issues for Regulation-An Interim Report from The CCSReg Project 2009, Carnegie-Mellon, Pittsburgh.
7. Carrington D. EU Carbon Price Crashes to Record Low 2013, 〈http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/jan/24/eu-carbon-price-crash-record-low, [WWW Document]. Guard.
8. Chen F.-H., Hsu T.-S., Tzeng G.-H. A balanced scorecard approach to establish a performance evaluation and relationship model for hot spring hotels based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DEMATEL and ANP. Int. J. Hosp. Manage. 2011, 30:908-932.
9. Chen Y.-C., Lien H.-P., Tzeng G.-H. Measures and evaluation for environment watershed plans using a novel hybrid MCDM model. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37:926-938.
10. CSLF Discussion Paper on Public Communication and Outreach 2005, CSLF.
11. Dapeng L., Weiwei W. Barriers and incentives of CCS deployment in China: results from semi-structured interviews. Energy Policy 2009, 37:2421-2432.
12. Davies L.L., Uchitel K., Ruple J. Understanding barriers to commercial-scale carbon capture and sequestration in the United States: an empirical assessment. Energy Policy 2013, 59:745-761.
13. De Best-Waldhober M., Brunsting S., Paukovic M. Public concepts of CCS: understanding of the Dutch general public and its reflection in the media. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 11:S139-S147.
14. 2 capture and storage technologies in the Netherlands. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3:322-332.
15. De Bruijn H., ten Heuvelhof E. Management in Networks: On Multi-actor Decision Making 2008, Routledge, London.
16. De Coninck H., Stephens J.C., Metz B. Global learning on carbon capture and storage: a call for strong international cooperation on CCS demonstration. Energy Policy 2009, 37:2161-2165.
17. De Figueiredo M.A. Liability of Carbon Dioxide Storage 2007, (Ph.D. Dissertation), MIT University, Cambridge.
18. EC ROAD Project Submitted by the Netherlands for Financing Under Juncker's Investment Plan 2014, 〈http://ccsnetwork.eu/blog/2014/12/16/road-project-submitted-netherlands-financing-under-juncker%E2%80%99s-investment-plan (accessed 2.18.15), [WWW Document].
19. 2 2014, 〈http://decarboni.se/publications/ccs-liability-legislation/liability-under-european-ccs-directive-storage-co2 (accessed 4.22.15), [WWW Document]. decarbonai.se. Solut. to Clim. Chang.
20. EC Structural Reform of the European Carbon Market 2015, EC, [WWW Document]. Clim. Action.
21. EPRG The efficiency of policy instruments for the deployment of CCS as a large-sized technology. EPRG Working Paper 2010, EPRG, Paris.
22. European Commission 2030 Framework for Climate and Energy Policies 2014, 〈http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/2030/index_en.htm (accessed 2.17.15), [WWW Document].
23. European Commission The 2020 climate and energy package [WWW Document] 2014, URL: http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/package/index_en.htm (accessed 2.17.15).
24. Evar B. Conditional inevitability: expert perceptions of carbon capture and storage uncertainties in the UK context. Energy Policy 2011, 39:3414-3424.
25. Everaars R. The Rotterdam Climate Initiative: Carbon, Capture & Solved? 2012, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
26. Fischedick M., Pietzner K., Supersberger N., Esken A., Kuckshinrichs W., Zapp P., Linßen J., Schumann D., Radgen P., Cremer C., Gruber E., Schnepf N., Roser A., Idrissova F. Stakeholder acceptance of carbon capture and storage in Germany. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:4783-4787.
27. GCCSI The Global Status of CCS 2013, GCCSI, Melborne.
28. GCCSI Large Scale CCS Projects-Projects Map & Database 2015, 〈http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/projects/large-scale-ccs-projects#overview (accessed 2.19.15), [WWW Document].
29. Gjerset M., Lindberg M. Policy Instruments for Large-scale CCS 2013, ZERO, Oslo.
30. Gough C. State of the art in carbon dioxide capture and storage in the UK: an experts' review. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2:155-168.
31. Gough C., Mander S., Haszeldine S. A roadmap for carbon capture and storage in the UK. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:1-12.
32. Grantham Institute for Climate Change Attitudes and barriers to deployment of CCS from industrial sources in the UK. Grantham Report GR6 2014, Grantham Institute for Climate Change.
33. Groenenberg H., de Coninck H. Effective EU and member state policies for stimulating CCS. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2:653-664.
34. 2 Capture and Storage in Rotterdam: A Network Approach 2011, Rotterdam Climate Initiative, Rotterdam.
35. Huizeling E., Ros M., Schoenmakers H., Irons R., Boon G. CCS project development in Rotterdam. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:5661-5668. 10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.558.
36. IEA Carbon Capture and Storage in the CDM 2007, IEA, Paris.
37. 2 Capture and Storage 2008, Energy Technology and Analysis.
38. IEA Energy Technology Perspectives-Scenarios & Strategies to 2050 2010, IEA, Paris.
39. IEA Technology Roadmap-Carbon Capture and Storage 2013, IEA, Paris.
40. IEA Global Action to Advance Carbon Capture and Storage 2013, IEA, Paris.
41. IEA Technology Roadmap-Carbon Capture and Storage in Industrial Applications 2013, 10.1007/SpringerReference:7300.
42. IPCC Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Summary for Policymakers and Technical Summary 2005, IPCC.
43. IPCC Climate change 2014, mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014, Cambridge University Press, UK.
44. 2 capture and storage: a geopolitical discussion. Therm. Sci. 2012, 16:655-668.
45. Johnsson F., Reiner D., Itaoka K., Herzog H. Stakeholder attitudes on carbon capture and storage-an international comparison. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2010, 4:410-418.
46. 2 storage in the depleted gas field offshore the Netherlands. Energy Procedia 2013, 37:6287-6294.
47. 2 capture ready designs: a case study of stakeholder perceptions in Guangdong, China. Energy Policy 2012, 45:243-251.
48. Lin C.-L., Tzeng G.-H. A value-created system of science (technology) park by using DEMATEL. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36:9683-9697.
49. Markusson N., Kern F., Watson J. Assessing CCS viability-a socio-technical framework. Energy Procedia 2011, 4:5744-5751.
50. Markusson N., Kern F., Watson J., Arapostathis S., Chalmers H., Ghaleigh N., Heptonstall P., Pearson P., Rossati D., Russell S. A socio-technical framework for assessing the viability of carbon capture and storage technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2012, 79:903-918.
51. 2 capture and storage projects-more than missed opportunities. Environ. Earth Sci. 2012, 67(2):633-636.
52. Mccoy S. Carbon Capture and Storage: Legal and Regulatory Review 2014, IEA, Paris.
53. MIT Carbon Capture and Sequestration Project Database 2015, 〈http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/index.html (accessed 2.19.15), [WWW Document].
54. MIT ROAD (Rotterdam Opslag en Afvang Demonstratieproject) Fact sheet: Carbon dioxide capture and storage projec [WWW Document] 2015, URL http://sequestration.mit.edu/tools/projects/maasvlkte.html (accessed 2.18.15).
55. 2. Carbon Capture, Storage and Use: Technical, Economic, Environmental and Societal Perspectives 2015, 67-100. Jülich, Germany. W. Kuckshinrichs, J.-F. Hake (Eds.).
56. Neades S., Haines M., Dixon T. What have we learnt from CCS demonstrations-Phase 1b. Energy Procedia 2013, 37:6295-6305.
57. Dimantchev E., Lawson A., Ferdinand M., Chai H., Nordeng A., Fjellheim H., Schjølset S., Melum F. Carbon 2013. At a tipping point. Point Carbon 2013, Thomson Reuters Point Carbon.
58. Power-technlogogy.com, n.d. Nuon Magnum IGCC power plant, Netherlands [WWW Document]. URL http://www.powertechnology. com/projects/nuonmagnum-igcc/ (accessed 3.5.15).
59. Price I., Smith B., Bennaceur K., Bohm M., Coleman D., Cook P., Fink R., Gale J., Gielen D., Lee A., Mourits F., Sacuta N., Zapantis A. Carbon capture and storage. Meeting the Challenge of Climate Change. IEA Greenhouse Gas R&D Programme 2008.
60. Radgen P., Irons R., Schoenmakers H. Too early or too late for CCS-what needs to be done to overcome the valley of death for carbon capture and storage in Europe?. Energy Procedia 2013, 37:6189-6201.
61. Ramírez A., Hoogwijk M., Hendriks C., Faaij A. Using a participatory approach to develop a sustainability framework for carbon capture and storage systems in the Netherlands. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2008, 2:136-154.
62. RCI Investing in sustainable growth. Rotterdam Sustainability Monitor 2011-summary 2011, RCI, Rotterdam.
63. 2 Hub: Crucial Stepping Stone Towards Sustainable Economic Growth 2012, RCI, Rotterdam.
64. RCI Transport & Storage Economics of CCS Networks in the Netherlands 2013, RCI.
65. Reiner D., Liang X. Opportunities and hurdles in applying CCS Technologies in China-with a focus on industrial stakeholders. Energy Procedia 2009, 1:4827-4834.
66. Reiner D., Liang X. Stakeholder Perceptions of Demonstrating CCS in China-A Study for UK-EU-China Near Zero Emissions Coal Initiative (NZEC) Technology 2009.
67. Roy B., Misra S.K., Gupta P., Neha A.G. An integrated DEMATEL and AHP approach for personnel estimation. IJCSITS 2012, 2:1206-1212.
68. Rubin E.S., Coninck H. IPCC Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage 2005, Prep. by Work. Gr. III Intergov. panel Clim. Chang. Intergov. Panel Clim. Chang.
69. Saaty T.L. Decision making-the Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP). J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 2004, 13:1-35.
70. Saaty T.L. The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: the AHP/ANP approach. Oper. Res. 2013, 61:1101-1118.
71. Sala R., Oltra C. Experts' attitudes towards CCS technologies in Spain. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:1339-1345.
72. Sandén B., Azar a.C. Near-term technology policies for long-term climate targets-economy wide versus technology specific approaches. Energy Policy 2005, 33:1557-1576.
73. Schoenmakers H. The ROAD project experiences and Rotterdam cluster development update. ROAD 2013, 1-29. London.
74. Scott V. What can we expect from Europe's carbon capture and storage demonstrations?. Energy Policy 2013, 54:66-71. 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.11.026.
75. Seebregts A.J., Groenenberg H., Boot P.A., Snoep H.J.M. Policy Instruments for Advancing CCS in Dutch Power Generation 2010, ECN, Petten.
76. 2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: an assessment of the key determining factors. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2009, 3:344-356.
77. 2 capture and storage in Europe: results from a survey. Energy Policy 2007, 35:5091-5108.
78. Sharma M.J., Moon I., Bae H. Analytic hierarchy process to assess and optimize distribution network. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 202:256-265.
79. Stigson P., Hansson A., Lind M. Obstacles for CCS deployment: an analysis of discrepancies of perceptions. Mitig. Adapt. Strategy Global Change 2012, 17:601-619.
80. Sumrit D., Anuntavoranich P. Using DEMATEL Method to Analyze the Causal Relations on Technological Innovation Capability Evaluation Factors in Thai Technology-Based Firms 2013, vol. 4:81-103.
81. Sun X.X., Liu N., Fan H.Y., Li W.Q., Zhou Y.X. The impact study of hexavalent chromium on the environmental safety of the drinking water source from the Jiangsu section of the Yangtze river basin. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013, 765-767:2976-2979.
82. Supersberger N., Fischedick M., Schüwer D., Viebahn P. Challenges and barriers for carbon capture and storage resulting from energy economics and additional aspects. Sino-German Conference, and the Sino-German Workshop "Eor and New Drilling Technology" 2010, 45-49.
83. Ter Mors E., Weenig M.W.H., Ellemers N., Daamen D.D.L. Effective communication about complex environmental issues: perceived quality of information about carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS) depends on stakeholder collaboration. J. Environ. Psychol. 2010, 30:347-357.
84. Terwel B.W., Harinck F., Ellemers N., Daamen D.D.L. Going beyond the properties of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) technology: how trust in stakeholders affects public acceptance of CCS. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2011, 5:181-188.
85. Terwel B.W., ter Mors E., Daamen D.D.L. It's not only about safety: beliefs and attitudes of 811 local residents regarding a CCS project in Barendrecht. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 9:41-51. 10.1016/j.ijggc.2012.02.017.
86. The Economists Carbon Copy 2013, 〈http://www.economist.com/news/business/21591601-some-firms-are-preparing-carbon-price-would-make-big-difference-carbon-copy, [WWW Document].
87. TNO Independent storage assessment of offshore CO2 storage options for Rotterdam. Summary Report 2011, TNO, Utrecht.
88. Tsai W.-H., Chou W.-C. Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: a novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36:1444-1458.
89. Tseng M.-L. Using a hybrid MCDM model to evaluate firm environmental knowledge management in uncertainty. Appl. Soft Comput. 2011, 11:1340-1352. 10.1016/j.asoc.2010.04.006.
90. Tzeng G., Chiang C., Li C. Evaluating intertwined effects in e-learning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Syst. Appl. 2007, 32:1028-1044.
91. UNFCCC Synthesis of Views on Technological, Methodological, Legal, Policy and Financial Issues Relevant to the Consideration of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in Geological Formations as Project Activities under the Clean Development Mechanism: Note by the S 2008, UNFCCC, Bonn.
92. Vaidya O.S., Kumar S. Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2006, 169:1-29.
93. Van Alphen K., van Voorst tot Voorst Q., Hekkert M.P., Smits R.E.H.M. Societal acceptance of carbon capture and storage technologies. Energy Policy 2007, 35:4368-4380. 10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.006.
94. 2 Europipe 2010.
95. Van Egmond S., Brouwer J.H., Heimeriks G.J., Hekkert M.P. Overview and analysis of the Dutch CCS program as a knowledge network. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 11:S1-S9.
96. Von Stechow C., Watson J., Praetorius B. Policy incentives for carbon capture and storage technologies in Europe: A qualitative multi-criteria analysis. Global Environ. Change 2011, 21:346-357.
97. Wallquist L., Seigo S.L., Visschers V.H.M., Siegrist M. Public acceptance of CCS system elements: a conjoint measurement. Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control 2012, 6:77-83.
98. 2 Prices to Average Eur5-10/mt to 2020: Survey 2014, 〈http://www.platts.com/latest-news/electric-power/london/eu-co2-prices-to-average-eur5-10mt-to-2020-survey-26804376, [WWW Document].
99. Wu W.-W., Lee Y.-T. Developing global managers' competencies using the fuzzy DEMATEL method. Expert Syst. Appl. 2007, 32:499-507.
100. Yang Y.O., Shieh H., Leu J., Tzeng G. A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. Int. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 5:160-168.
101. ZEP European Technology Platform for Zero Emission Fossil Fuel Power Plants (ZEP) Strategic Overview 2007, ZEP, Brussels.
102. 2 Capture and Storage (CCS)-ZEP's Proposal 2009, EU, Brussels.
103. ZEP EU CCS Demonstration Projects-Challenges and Blockers on the Way to FID 2012, ZEP, Brussels.
104. ZEROCO2 Rotterdam Afvang en Opslag Demo (ROAD) 2014, 〈http://www.zeroco2.no/projects/rotterdam-afvang-en-opslag-demo-road, [WWW Document].
105. ZeroCO2 CCS Database-List of CCS Projects 2015, 〈http://www.zeroco2.no/projects/list-projects/ (accessed 2.20.15), [WWW Document].
106. Zundel S., Erdmann G., Kemp R., Nill J., Sartorius C. Conceptual framework. Time Strategies, Innovation, and Environmental Policy 2005, Edward Elgar Publishing, Publishing; Cheltenham.