Exogenous abscisic acid significantly affects proteome in tea plant (Camellia sinensis) exposed to drought stress

Horticulture Research

Volumn 1, Issue , 2014, Pages

  Zhou, Lin ^a   Xu, Hui ^a   Mischke, Sue ^b   Meinhardt, Lyndel W ^b   Zhang, Dapeng ^b   Zhu, Xujun ^a   Li, Xinghui ^a   Fang, Wanping ^a,b  

^a NANJING AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84939436592     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20527276     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hortres.2014.29     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Upadhyaya H, Panda SK. Abiotic stress responses in tea [Camellia sinensis L (O) Kuntze]: An overview. Rev Agric Sci 2013; 1: 1-10.
2. Wijeratne MA, Anandacoomaraswamy A, Amarathunga MK et al. Assessment of impact of climate change on productivity of tea (Camellia sinensis L.) plantations in Sri Lanka. J Natn Sci Found Sri Lanka 2007; 35: 119-126.
3. Piás B, Matesanz S, Herrero A et al. Transgenerational effects of three global change drivers on an endemic Mediterranean plant. Oikos 2010; 119: 1435-1444.
4. Upadhyaya H, Panda SK. Responses of Camellia sinensis to drought and rehydration. Biol Plant 2004; 48: 597-600.
5. Damayanthi MM, Mohotti AJ, Nissanka SP. Comparison of tolerant ability of mature field grown tea (Camellia sinensis L.) cultivars exposed to a drought stress in passara area. Trop Agric Res 2010; 22: 66-75.
6. Gupta S, Bharalee R, Bhorali P et al. Identification of drought tolerant progenies in tea by gene expression analysis. Funct Integr Genomics 2012; 12: 543-563.
7. Das A, Das S, Mondal TK. Identification of differentially expressed gene profiles in young roots of tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze] subjected to drought stress using suppression subtractive hybridization. Plant Mol Biol Rep 2012; 30: 1088-1101.
8. Hirayama T, Shinozaki K. Perception and transduction of abscisic acid signals: keys to the function of the versatile plant hormone ABA. Trends Plant Sci 2007; 12: 343-351.
9. Ton J, Flors V, Mauch-Mani B. The multifaceted role of ABA in disease resistance. Trends Plant Sci 2009; 14: 310-317.
10. Zong XJ, Li DP, Gu LK et al. Abscisic acid and hydrogen peroxide induce a novel maize group C MAP kinase gene, ZmMPK7, which is responsible for the removal of reactive oxygen species. Planta 2009; 229: 485-495.
11. Leung J, Giraudat J. Abscisic acid signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Phys 1998; 49: 199-222.
12. Lee SC, Luan S. ABA signal transduction at the crossroad of biotic and abiotic stress responses. Plant Cell Environ 2012; 35: 53-60.
13. Aroca R, Alguacil MD, Vernieri P et al. Plant responses to drought stress and exogenous ABA application are modulated differently by mycorrhization in tomato and an ABA-deficient mutant (sitiens). Microb Ecol 2008; 56: 704-719.
14. Du YL, Wang ZY, Fan JW et al. Exogenous abscisic acid reduces water loss and improves antioxidant defence, desiccation tolerance and transpiration efficiency in two spring wheat cultivars subjected to a soil water deficit. Funct Plant Biol 2013; 40: 494-506.
15. Li CY, Yin CY, Liu SR. Different responses of two contrasting Populus davidiana populations to exogenous abscisic acid application. Environ Exp Bot 2004; 51: 237-246.
16. Christmann A, Weiler EW, Steudle E et al. A hydraulic signal in root-To-shoot signalling of water shortage. Plant J 2007; 52: 167-174.
17. Zeller G, Henz SR, Widmer CK et al. Stress-induced changes in the Arabidopsis thaliana transcriptome analyzed using whole-genome tiling arrays. Plant J 2009; 58: 1068-1082.
18. Rabbani MA, Maruyama K, Abe H et al. Monitoring expression profiles of rice genes under cold, drought, and high-salinity stresses and abscisic acid application using cDNA microarray and RNA gel-blot analyses. Plant Physiol 2003; 133: 1755-1767.
19. Wallach R, Da-Costa N, Raviv M et al. Development of synchronized, autonomous, and self-regulated oscillations in transpiration rate of a whole tomato plant under water stress. J Exp Bot 2010; 61: 3439-3449.
20. Cao MJ, Liu X, Zhang Y et al. An ABA-mimicking ligand that reduces water loss and promotes drought resistance in plants. Cell Res 2013; 23: 1043-1054.
21. Verslues PE, Juenger TE. Drought, metabolites, and Arabidopsis natural variation: A promising combination for understanding adaptation to water-limited environments. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2011; 14: 240-245.
22. Rossignol M, Peltier JB, Mock HP et al. Plant proteome analysis: A 2004-2006 update. Proteomics 2006; 6: 5529-5548.
23. O'Farrell PH. High resolution two-dimensional electrophoresis of proteins. J Biol Chem 1975; 250: 4007-4021.
24. Kosova K, Vitamvas P, Prasil IT et al. Plant proteome changes under abiotic stress-contribution of proteomics studies to understanding plant stress response. J Proteomics 2011; 74: 1301-1322.
25. Hajheidari M, Abdollahian-Noghabi M, Askari H et al. Proteome analysis of sugar beet leaves under drought stress. Proteomics 2005; 5: 950-960.
26. Chitteti BR, Peng ZH. Proteome and phosphoproteome differential expression under salinity stress in rice (Oryza sativa) roots. J Proteome Res 2007; 6: 1718-1727.
27. Deeba F, Pandey AK, Ranjan S et al. Physiological and proteomic responses of cotton (Gossypium herbaceum L.) to drought stress. Plant Physiol Bioch 2012; 53: 6-18.
28. Sharmin SA, Alam I, Rahman MA et al. Mapping the leaf proteome of Miscanthus sinensis and its application to the identification of heat-responsive proteins. Planta 2013; 238: 459-474.
29. Shi Y, Jiang L, Zhang L et al. Dynamic changes in proteins during apple (Malus 3 domestica) fruit ripening and storage. Horti Res 2014; 1: 6.
30. Guo CF, Sun Y, Lai CC et al. [Proteomic analysis of tea leaf under polyethylene glycol stress.] J Tea Sci 2009; 29: 79-88. Chinese.
31. Wan Q, Xu RK, Li XH. Proton release from tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.) roots induced by Al(III) under hydroponic conditions. Soil Res 2012; 50: 482-488.
32. Knudson LL, Tibbitts TW, Edwards GE. Measurement of ozone injury by determination of leaf chlorophyll concentration. Plant Physiol 1977; 60: 606-608.
33. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil 1973; 39: 205-208.
34. Dhindsa RS, Plumb-Dhindsa P, Thorpe TA. Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J Exp Bot 1981; 32: 93.
35. Jacobs DI, Rijssen MS, Heijden R et al. Sequential solubilization of proteins precipitated with trichloroacetic acid in acetone from cultured Catharanthus roseus cells yields 52% more spots after two-dimensional electrophoresis. Proteomics 2001; 1: 1345-1350.
36. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 1976; 72: 248-254.
37. Wang XC, Li XF, Li YX. A modified Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining method at nanogram sensitivity compatible with proteomic analysis. Biotechnol Lett 2007; 29: 1599-1603.
38. Katayama H, Nagasu T, Oda Y. Improvement of in-gel digestion protocol for peptide mass fingerprinting by matrix-Assisted laser desorption/ionization timeof-flight mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Sp 2001; 15: 1416-1421.
39. Sharma P, Kumar S. Differential display-mediated identification of three droughtresponsive expressed sequence tags in tea [Camellia sinensis (L.) O. Kuntze]. J Biosci 2005; 30: 231-235.
40. Mafakheri A, Siosemardeh A, Bahramnejad B et al. Effect of drought stress on yield, proline and chlorophyll contents in three chickpea cultivars. Aust J Crop Sci 2010; 4: 580-585.
41. Lehmann S, Funck D, Szabados L et al. Proline metabolism and transport in plant development. Amino Acids 2010; 39: 949-962.
42. Gunes A, Soylemezoglu G, Inal A et al. Antioxidant and stomatal responses of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) to boron toxicity. Sci Hort 2006; 110: 279-284.
43. Bricker TM, Roose JL, Zhang PP et al. The PsbP family of proteins. Photosynth Res 2013; 116: 235-250.
44. Mercaldi GF, Pereira HM, Cordeiro AT et al. Structural role of the active-site metal in the conformation of Trypanosoma brucei phosphoglycerate mutase. FEBS J 2012; 279: 2012-2021.
45. Bray EA. Plant responses to water deficit. Trends Plant Sci 1997; 2: 48-54.
46. Brash AR. Lipoxygenases: occurrence, functions, catalysis, and acquisition of substrate. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 23679-23682.
47. Park YS, Kunze S, Ni XZ et al. Comparative molecular and biochemical characterization of segmentally duplicated 9-lipoxygenase genes ZmLOX4 and ZmLOX5 of maize. Planta 2010; 231: 1425-1437.
48. Bell E, Mullet JE. Lipoxygenase gene-expression is modulated in plants by water deficit, wounding, and methyl jasmonate. Mol Gen Genet 1991; 230: 456-462.
49. Sofo A, Dichio B, Xiloyannis C et al. Lipoxygenase activity and proline accumulation in leaves and roots of olive trees in response to drought stress. Physiol Plantarum 2004; 121: 58-65.
50. Charron JB, Ouellet F, Houde M et al. The plant apolipoprotein D ortholog protects Arabidopsis against oxidative stress. BMC Plant Biol 2008; 8: 86.
51. Teich R, Zauner S, Baurain D et al. Origin and distribution of Calvin cycle fructose and sedoheptulose bisphosphatases in plantae and complex algae: A single secondary origin of complex red plastids and subsequent propagation via tertiary endosymbioses. Protist 2007; 158: 263-276.
52. Moon HJ, Tiwari MK, Singh R et al. Molecular determinants of the cofactor specificity of ribitol dehydrogenase, a short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase. Appl Environ Microb 2012; 78: 3079-3086.
53. Jacques S, Ghesquiere B, van Breusegem F et al. Plant proteins under oxidative attack. Proteomics 2013; 13: 932-940.
54. Hu XL, Liu RX, Li YH et al. Heat shock protein 70 regulates the abscisic acid-induced antioxidant response of maize to combined drought and heat stress. Plant Growth Regul 2010; 60: 225-235.
55. Andersson I, Backlund A. Structure and function of Rubisco. Plant Physiol Bioch 2008; 46: 275-291.
56. Raven JA. Rubisco: still themost abundant protein of Earth? New Phytol 2013; 198: 1-3.
57. Parry MAJ, Andralojc PJ, Khan S et al. Rubisco activity: effects of drought stress. Ann Bot-London 2002; 89: 833-839.
58. Liu TX, Zhang L, Yuan ZL et al. Identification of proteins regulated by ABA in response to combined drought and heat stress in maize roots. Acta Physiol Plant 2013; 35: 501-513.
59. Horn R, Chudobova I, Hansel U et al. Simultaneous treatment with tebuconazole and abscisic acid induces drought and salinity stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana by maintaining key plastid protein levels. J Proteome Res 2013; 12: 1266-1281.
60. Ellis RJ. Themost abundant protein in the world. Trends Biochem Sci 1979; 4: 241-244.
61. Lee DG, Ahsan N, Lee SH et al. An approach to identify cold-induced low-Abundant proteins in rice leaf. CR Biol 2007; 330: 215-225.
62. Xi JH, Wang X, Li SY et al. Polyethylene glycol fractionation improved detection of low-Abundant proteins by two-dimensional electrophoresis analysis of plant proteome. Phytochemistry 2006; 67: 2341-2348.
63. Alvarez S, Choudhury SR, Pandey S. Comparative quantitative proteomics analysis of the ABA response of roots of drought-sensitive and drought-Tolerant wheat varieties identifies proteomic signatures of drought adaptability. J Proteome Res 2014; 13: 1688-1701.