Motivational interviewing with and without normative feedback for adolescents with substance use problems: A preliminary study

Substance Abuse

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 350-358

  Smith, Douglas C ^a   Ureche, Daniel J ^a   Davis, Jordan P ^a   Walters, Scott T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

Adolescents; clinical trial; motivational interviewing; normative feedback; substance abuse treatment centers

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84939419820     PISSN: 08897077     EISSN: 15470164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08897077.2014.988838     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ilgen MA, Schulenberg J, Kloska DD, Czyz E, Johnston L, OMalley P. Prevalence and characteristics of substance abuse treatment utilization by US adolescents: national data from 1987 to 2008. Addict Behav. 2011; 36: 1349-1352
2. Dennis ML, White MK, Ives ML. Individual characteristics and needs associated with substance misuse of adolescents and young adults in addiction treatment. In: Leukefeld C, Gullotta T, Stanton Tindall M, eds. Adolescent Substance Abuse: Evidence-Based Approaches to Prevention and Treatment. New York: Springer: 45-72
3. Smith DC, Hall JA, Jang M, Arndt S. Therapist adherence to a motivational-interviewing intervention improves treatment entry for substance-misusing adolescents with low problem perception. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2009; 70: 131-136
4. Garnick DW, Lee MT, Horgan CM, Acevedo A. Adapting Washington Circle performance measures for public sector substance abuse treatment systems. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009; 36: 265-277
5. Smith DC, Davis JP, Ureche DJ, Tabb, KM. Normative feedback and adolescent readiness to change: a small randomized trial. Res Soc Work Pract. In press
6. Garnick DW, Lee MT, Horgan C, et al. Lessons from five states: public sector use of the Washington Circle performance measures. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011; 40: 241-254
7. Garnick DW, Lee MT, OBrien PL, et al. The Washington Circle engagement performance measures association with adolescent treatment outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012; 124: 250-258
8. Dennis ML, Scott CK, Funk R, Foss MA. The duration and correlates of addiction and treatment careers. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005; 28: S51-S62
9. Oesterle S, Hill KG, Hawkins JD, Guo J, Catalano RF, Abbott RD. Adolescent heavy episodic drinking trajectories and health in young adulthood. J Stud Alcohol. 2004; 65: 204-212
10. Boden JM, Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ. Alcohol and STI risk: evidence from a new zealand longitudinal birth cohort. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2011; 113: 200-206
11. Strunin L, Hingson R. Alcohol, drugs, and adolescent sexual behavior. Subst Use Misuse. 1992; 27: 129-146
12. Toumbourou JW, Stockwell T, Neighbors C, Marlatt G, Sturge J, Rehm J. Interventions to reduce harm associated with adolescent substance use. Lancet. 2007; 369: 1391-1401
13. Boden JM, Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ. Alcohol misuse and violent behavior: findings from a 30-year longitudinal study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012; 122: 135-141
14. Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ. Alcohol abuse and crime: a fixed-effects regression analysis. Addiction. 2000; 95: 1525-1536
15. Mason WA, Kosterman R, Haggerty KP, et al. Dimensions of adolescent alcohol involvement as predictors of young-adult major depression. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008; 69: 275-285
16. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. 3rd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2012
17. Smith DC. Delivering motivational feedback with motivational feedback following the GAIN-Q3 administration: the CHOICE model. In: Titus JC, Feeney T, Smith DC, Rivers TL, Kelly LL, Dennis ML., eds. GAIN-Q3 3.1: Administration, Clinical Interpretation, and Brief Intervention Manual. Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems; 2012: 121-166
18. Bell EC, Marcus DK, Goodlad JK. Are the parts as good as the whole? A meta-analysis of component treatment studies. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013; 81: 722-736
19. Donohue B, Azrin NH, Lawson H, Friedlander J, Teichner G, Rindsberg J. Improving initial session attendance of substance abusing and conduct disordered adolescents: a controlled study. J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 1999; 8: 1-13
20. Santisteban DA, Szapocznik J, Perez-Vidal A, Kurtines WM, Murray EJ, LaPerriere A. Efficacy of intervention for engaging youth and families into treatment and some variables that may contribute to differential effectiveness. J Fam Psychol. 1996; 10: 35-44
21. Szapocznik J, Perez-Vidal A, Brickman AL, et al. Engaging adolescent drug abusers and their families in treatment: a strategic structural systems approach. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988; 56: 552-557
22. Waldron HB, Kern-Jones S, Turner CW, Peterson TR, Ozechowski TJ. Engaging resistant adolescents in drug abuse treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007; 32: 133-142
23. Garner BR, Godley SH, Funk RR. Evaluating admission alternatives in an outpatient substance abuse treatment program for adolescents. Eval Program Plann. 2002; 25: 287-294
24. Naar-King S, Suarez M. Motivational Interviewing With Adolescents and Young Adults. New York: Guilford Press; 2011
25. Barnett E, Sussman S, Smith C, Rohrbach LA, Spruijt-Metz D. Motivational interviewing for adolescent substance use: a review of the literature. Addict Behav. 2012; 37: 1325-1334
26. Smith DC, Hall JA. Strengths-oriented referrals for teens (SORT): giving balanced feedback to teens and families. Health Soc Work. 2007; 32: 69-72
27. Winters KC, Fahnhorst T, Botzet A, Lee S, Lalone B. Brief intervention for drug-abusing adolescents in a school setting: outcomes and mediating factors. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2012; 42: 279-288
28. Walker DD, Stephens R, Roffman R, et al. Randomized controlled trial of motivational enhancement therapy with nontreatment-seeking adolescent cannabis users: a further test of the teen marijuana check-up. Psychol Addict Behav. 2011; 25: 474-484
29. Miller MB, Leffingwell T, Claborn K, Meier E, Walters S, Neighbors C. Personalized feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: an update of Walters & Neighbors (2005). Psychol Addict Behav. 2013; 27: 909-920
30. Walters ST, Vader AM, Harris TR. A controlled trial of Web-based feedback for heavy drinking college students. Prev Sci. 2007; 8: 83-88
31. Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: a theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000; 55: 469
32. Sussman S, Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: developmental period facilitative of the addictions. Eval Health Prof. 2014; 37: 469-480
33. Smith DC, Godley SH, Godley MD, Dennis ML. Adolescent community reinforcement approach outcomes differ among emerging adults and adolescents. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2011; 41: 422-430
34. Smith DC, Cleeland L, Dennis ML. Reasons for quitting among emerging adults and adolescents in substance-use-disorder treatment. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010; 71: 400-409
35. Steinberg L, Albert D, Cauffman E, Banich M, Graham S, Woolard J. Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: evidence for a dual systems model. Dev Psychol. 2008; 44: 1764-1778
36. Blakemore S, Choudhury S. Development of the adolescent brain: implications for executive function and social cognition. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006; 47: 296-312
37. Blume AW, Marlatt GA. The role of executive cognitive functions in changing substance use: what we know and what we need to know. Ann Behav Med. 2009; 37: 117-125
38. Walker DD. Marijuana use. In: Naar-King S, Suarez M., eds. Motivational Interviewing With Adolescents and Young Adults. New York: The Guilford Press; 2011: 91-99
39. Baer JS, Beadnell B, Garrett SB, Hartzler B, Wells EA, Peterson PL. Adolescent change language within a brief motivational intervention and substance use outcomes. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008; 22: 570-575
40. Dennis M, Godley SH, Diamond G, et al. The cannabis youth treatment (CYT) study: main findings from two randomized trials. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2004; 27: 197-213
41. Titus JC, Feeney T, Smith DC, et al. GAIN-Q3 3.1: Administration, Clinical Interpretation, and Brief Intervention Manual. Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems; 2012
42. Knight JR, Sherritt L, Harris SK, Gates EC, Chang G. Validity of brief alcohol screening tests among adolescents: a comparison of the AUDIT, POSIT, CAGE, and CRAFFT. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2003; 27: 67-73
43. Dennis ML, Titus JC, White MK, Unsicker JI, Hodgkins D. Global Appraisal of Individual Needs: Administration Guide for the GAIN and Related Measures. Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems; 2003
44. GAIN Coordinating Center. NORMS including alpha, mean, N, sd, ICC for adolescents (12-17), young adults (18-25) and adults (18+) by gender race and age using the CSAT 2012 SA dataset (excluding ATM & CYT) [electronic version]. Normal, IL: Chestnut Health Systems. Available at: http://Gaincc.org/-data/files/Psychometrics-and-Publications/resources/GAIN-I-NORMS.xls. Accessed 2013
45. Moyers T, Martin T, Manuel J, Miller W, Ernst D. Revised global scales: motivational interviewing treatment integrity 3.1. 1 (MITI 3.1. 1) [unpublished manuscript]. Albuquerque, NM: Center on Alcoholism, Substance Abuse and Addictions, University of New Mexico; 2010
46. Moyers TB, Martin T, Manuel JK, Hendrickson SM, Miller WR. Assessing competence in the use of motivational interviewing. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2005; 28: 19-26
47. Dennis ML, Funk R, Godley SH, Godley MD, Waldron H. Cross-validation of the alcohol and cannabis use measures in the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) and Timeline Followback (TLFB; Form 90) among adolescents in substance abuse treatment. Addiction. 2004; 99: 120-128
48. Buchan BJ, Dennis ML, Tims FM, Diamond GS. Cannabis use: consistency and validity of self-report, on-site urine testing and laboratory testing. Addiction. 2002; 97: 98-108
49. Dennis M, Scott C, Godley M, Funk R. Comparisons of adolescents and Adults by ASAM Using GAIN Data From the Drug Outcome Monitoring Study (DOMS): Preliminary Data Tables. Bloomington, IL: Chestnut Health Systems; 1999
50. Leon AC, Davis LL, Kraemer HC. The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. J Psychiatr Res. 2011; 45: 626-629
51. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013
52. Walters ST, Vader AM, Harris TR, Field CA, Jouriles EN. Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009; 77: 64-73
53. Doumas DM, Esp S, Turrisi R, Hausheer R, Cuffee C. A test of the efficacy of a brief, Web-based personalized feedback intervention to reduce drinking among 9th grade students. Addict Behav. 2014; 39: 231-238
54. Smith DC, Boel-Studt S, Cleeland L. Parental consent in adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome studies. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009; 37: 298-306
55. Garner BR, Godley SH, Funk RR, Dennis ML, Smith JE, Godley MD. Exposure to adolescent community reinforcement approach treatment procedures as a mediator of the relationship between adolescent substance abuse treatment retention and outcome. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009; 36: 252-264
56. Kraemer HC, Mintz J, Noda A, Tinklenberg J, Yesavage JA. Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006; 63: 484-489
57. Vader AM, Walters ST, Prabhu GC, Houck JM, Field CA. The language of motivational interviewing and feedback: counselor language, client language, and client drinking outcomes. Psychol Addict Behav. 2010; 24: 190-197
58. Killeen TK, Brady KT, Gold PB, Tyson C, Simpson KN. Comparison of self-report versus agency records of service utilization in a community sample of individuals with alcohol use disorders. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004; 73: 141-147