The two-visual-systems hypothesis and the perspectival features of visual experience

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue , 2015, Pages 225-233

  Foley, Robert T ^a,b   Whitwell, Robert L ^c   Goodale, Melvyn A ^b  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Egocentric and allocentric frames of reference; Perspectival accounts of visual experience; The two visual systems hypothesis; Ventral and dorsal processing

Indexed keywords

ALLOCENTRIC PROCESSING; ARTICLE; DORSAL STREAM; EGOCENTRIC PROCESSING; EXPERIENCE; HUMAN; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; TWO VISUAL SYSTEM HYPOTHESIS; VENTRAL STREAM; VISION; VISUAL SYSTEM; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY;

HUMANS; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84939415991     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.005     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bermúdez J. From two visual systems to two forms of content?. Psyche 2007, 13(2):1-7.
2. Bridgeman B., Peery S., Anand S. Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space. Perception & Psychophysics 1997, .
3. Briscoe R. Egocentric spatial representation in action and perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2009, 79(2):423-460. 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00284.x.
4. Briscoe, R., & Schwenkler, J. (n.d.). Conscious vision in action. Cognitive Science, 1-21.
5. Brogaard B. Vision for action and the contents of perception. The Journal of Philosophy 2012, 109(10):569-587.
6. Burge T. Origins of objectivity 2010, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
7. Campbell J. Reference and consciousness 2002, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
8. Cassam Q. Self and world 1994, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Clark A. Visual experience and motor action: Are the bonds too tight?. The Philosophical Review 2001, 110(4):495. 10.2307/3182592.
10. Clark A. Perception, action, and experience: Unravelling the golden braid. Perception, action, and consciousness: Sensorimotor dynamics and two visual systems 2010, 51-68. Oxford University Press, New York. N. Gangopadhyay, M. Madary, F. Spicer (Eds.).
11. Crawford J. Three-dimensional transformations for goal-directed action. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2011, 34:309-331. .
12. Evans G. The varieties of reference 1982, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
13. Ganel T., Tanzer M., Goodale M. A double dissociation between action and perception in the context of visual illusions opposite effects of real and illusory size. Psychological Science 2008, 19(3):221-225. .
14. Gibson J. The ecological approach to visual perception 1979, Houghton-Mifflin, Boston, MA.
15. Gilinsky A. The effect of attitude upon the perception of size. The American Journal of Psychology 1955, 68:173-192. .
16. Goodale M.A. Transforming vision into action. Vision Research 2011, 51(13):1567-1587. 10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.027.
17. Goodale M., Haffenden A. Frames of reference for perception and action in the human visual system. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 1998, .
18. Goodale M., Humphrey G.K. The objects of action and perception. Cognition 1998, 67(1):181-207. .
19. Goodale M., Milner A. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neurosciences 1992, 15(1):20-25. .
20. Goodale M., Pélisson D., Prablanc C. Large adjustments in visually guided reaching do not depend on vision of the hand or perception of target displacement. Nature 1986, 320:748-750. .
21. Grush R. Skill theory v2.0: Dispositions, emulation, and spatial perception. Synthese 2007, 159(3):389-416. .
22. Husserl E. Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: Second book studies in the phenomenology of constitution (R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer trans.) 1990, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA.
23. Jacob P., Jeannerod M. Replies to our critics1. Psyche 2007, 13(2):1-11.
24. Jacob P., Vignemont F.De. Spatial coordinates and phenomenology in the two-visual systems model. Perception, action, and consciousness: Sensorimotor dynamics and two visual systems 2010, 125-144. Oxford University Press, New York. N. Gangopadhyay, M. Madary, F. Spicer (Eds.).
25. Kant, I. (1992). Concerning the ultimate ground of the differentiation of directions in space (1768). In D. Walford & R. M. (Trans.) (Eds.), I. Kant, Theoretical philosophy, 1755-1770 (pp. 365-372). Cambridge.
26. Kelly S. Content and constancy: Phenomenology, psychology, and the content of perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 2008, 76(3):682-690. .
27. Kiverstein J. Sensorimotor knowledge and the contents of experience. Perception, action, and consciousness: Sensorimotor dynamics and two visual systems 2010, 257-274. Oxford University Press, New York. N. Gangopadhyay, M. Madary, F. Spicer (Eds.).
28. Klatzky R. Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: Definitions, distinctions, and interconnections. Spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary approach to representing and processing spatial knowledge 1998, 1-17. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. C. Freksa, C. Habel (Eds.).
29. Kozuch, B. (n.d.). Dislocation, not dissociation: The neuroanatomical argument against visual experience driving motor action. Mind & Language.
30. Kravitz D., Saleem K., Baker C.I., Mishkin M. A new neural framework for visuospatial processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2011, 12(4):217-230. .
31. Kravitz D., Saleem K., Baker C., Ungerleider L., Mishkin M. The ventral visual pathway: An expanded neural framework for the processing of object quality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2013, 17(1):26-49. .
32. Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of perception (D.A. Landis Trans.) 2012, Routledge, New York, NY.
33. Milner D.A., Goodale M.A. The visual brain in action 2006, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
34. Mole C. Illusions, demonstratives, and the zombie action hypothesis. Mind 2009, 118(472):995-1011. 10.1093/mind/fzp109.
35. Noë A. Varieties of presence 2012, Harvard University Press, Boston, MA.
36. O'Regan J.K., Noë A. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24(5):939-973. discussion 973-1031, .
37. Peacocke C. A study of concepts 1992, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
38. Schwenkler J. Vision, self-location, and the phenomenology of the "Point of View". NoÛs 2014, 48(1):137-155. .
39. Shepherd J. Conscious action/zombie action. NoÛs 2015, 1-26. 10.1111/nous.12086.
40. Stöttinger E., Pfusterschmied J., Wagner H., Danckert J., Anderson B., Perner J. Getting a grip on illusions: Replicating Stöttinger et al results with 3-D objects. Experimental Brain Research 2012, 216(1):155-157.
41. Stöttinger E., Soder K., Pfusterschmied J., Wagner H., Perner J. Division of labour within the visual system: Fact or fiction? Which kind of evidence is appropriate to clarify this debate?. Experimental Brain Research 2010, 202(1):79-88.
42. Strawson P. Individuals 1959, Methuen and Co., Ltd, London.
43. Thaler L., Goodale M. Beyond distance and direction: The brain represents target locations non-metrically. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(3):1-27. .
44. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In Analysis of Visual Behavior (Vol. 549, pp. 549-586). doi:10.2139/ssrn.1353746.
45. Wallhagen M. Consciousness and action: Does cognitive science support (mild) epiphenomenalism?. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 2007, 58(3):539-561. 10.1093/bjps/axm023.
46. Wong E., Mack A. Saccadic programming and perceived location. Acta Psychologica 1981, 48(1):123-131. .
47. Wu W. The case for zombie agency. Mind 2013, 122(485):217-230. 10.1093/mind/fzt030.
48. Wu W. Against division: Consciousness, information and the visual streams. Mind & Language 2014, 29(4):383-406. 10.1111/mila.12056.