Application of life cycle assessment to sheep production systems: investigating co-production of wool and meat using case studies from major global producers

International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 463-476

  Wiedemann, Stephen G ^a   Ledgard, Stewart F ^b   Henry, Beverley K ^c   Yan, Ming Jia ^a   Mao, Ningtao ^d   Russell, Stephen J ^d  

^a FSA Consulting   (Australia)

^b RUAKURA RESEARCH CENTRE   (New Zealand)

^c QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Allocation; Carbon footprint; GHG; Land use; LCA

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE;

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BIOPHYSICAL ALLOCATION; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CASE STUDY; ECONOMIC ALLOCATION; FARMING SYSTEM; FOSSIL ENERGY; LAMB MEAT; LAND USE; LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT; LIVEWEIGHT GAIN; MERINO SHEEP; NEW ZEALAND; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; PROTEIN MASS ALLOCATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHEEP FARMING; SYSTEM EXPANSION; TEXTILE; UNITED KINGDOM; WOOL;

OVIS ARIES;

EID: 84939415711     PISSN: 09483349     EISSN: 16147502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11367-015-0849-z     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. AFRC (1990) Nutritive requirements of ruminant animals: energy, Issue 5 of Report (Agriculture and Food Research Council, Technical Committee on Responses to Nutrients), CAB International
2. Ayer NW, Tyedmers PH, Pelletier NL, Sonesson U, Scholz A (2007) Co-product allocation in life cycle assessments of seafood production systems: review of problems and strategies. J Life Cycle Assess 12(7):480–487
3. Basset-Mens C, Rankin DA, Boyes M, Ledgard S (2007) Life cycle assessment of New Zealand wool carpet—preliminary study. Report by AgResearch, Hamilton, New Zealand
4. Beef+LambNZ (2013) Compendium of New Zealand farm facts. P13013: 28
5. Brander M, Wylie C (2011) The use of substitution in attributional life cycle assessment. Greenh Gas Meas Manag 1(3–4):161–166
6. Brock PM, Graham P, Madden P, Alcock DJ (2013) Greenhouse gas emissions profile for 1 kg of wool produced in the Yass region, New South Wales: a life cycle assessment approach. Anim Prod Sci 53:495–508
7. BSI (2011) PAS 2050:2011—Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. BSI, London
8. Cederberg C, Stadig M (2003) System expansion and allocation in life cycle assessment of milk and beef production. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:350–356
9. Cronje PB (2012) Biological partitioning of environmental costs review for wool LCA. Australian Wool Innovation, Sydney
10. CSIRO (2007) Nutrient requirements of domesticated ruminants. CSIRO, Collingwood
11. DCCEE (2012) National Inventory Report 2010, Volume 1. Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency, Canberra, ACT, Australia
12. de Vries M, de Boer IJM (2010) Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: a review of life cycle assessments. Livest Sci 128:1–11
13. Dolle J-B, Agabriel J, Peyraud J-L, Faverdin P, Manneville V, Raison C et al (2011) Greenhouse gases in cattle breeding: evaluation and mitigation strategies. Prod Anim 24(5):415–431
14. Eady S, Carre A, Grant T (2012) Life cycle assessment modelling of complex agricultural systems with multiple food and fibre co-products. J Cleaner Prod 28:143–149
15. EBLEX (2012) Down to earth: The beef and sheep roadmap—phase three. EBLEX, Agriculture & Horticulture Development Board, England
16. EBLEX (2013) The outlook and opportunities for the English sheep industry: 2010 and beyond. EBLEX, Agriculture & Horticulture Development Board, England
17. Edwards-Jones G, Plassmann K, Harris IM (2009) Carbon footprinting of lamb and beef production systems: insights from an empirical analysis of farms in Wales, UK. J Agric Sci 147:707–719
18. FAOSTAT (2014) Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations: Statistics. FAO. http://faostat.fao.org/site/613/default.aspx#ancor. Accessed January 31 2014
19. Finnveden G, Hauschild MZ, Ekvall T, Guinée J, Heijungs R, Hellweg S, Koehler A, Pennington D, Suh S, (2009) Recent developments in life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 91:1–21
20. Flysjö A, Cederberg C, Henriksson M, Ledgard S (2011) How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. J Life Cycle Assess 16:420–430
21. Freer M, Moore AD, Donnelly JR (1997) GRAZPLAN: decision support systems for Australian grazing enterprises—II. The animal biology model for feed intake, production and reproduction and the GrazFeed DSS. Agric Syst 54:77–126
22. Frischknecht R, Jungbluth N, Althaus H, Bauer C, Doka G, Dones R, Hischier R, Hellweg S, Humbert S, Köllner T (2007) Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods vol ecoinvent report No. 3, v2.1. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Switzerland
23. Gac A, Ledgard S, Lorinquer E, Boyes M, Le Gall A (2012) Carbon footprint of sheep farms in France and New Zealand: comparison of results and methodology analysis. In: Corson MS, van der Werf HMG (eds) 8th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2012), Saint Malo, France. INRA, Rennes
24. Gerber P, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, Falcucci A, Tempio G (2013) Tackling climate change through livestock: a global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
25. Howden SM, Munro RK (1994) Methane from Australian livestock; implications for the greenhouse effect. Resour Sci Interface 4:5–9
26. Howden SM, White DH, McKeon GM, Scanlan JC, Carter JO (1994) Methods for exploring management options to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from tropical grazing systems. Clim Chang 27:49–70
27. IDF (2010) A common carbon footprint approach for dairy: the IDF guide to standard lifecycle assessment methodology for the dairy sector Bulletin of the International Dairy Federation 445
28. IPCC (2006) Emissions from livestock and manure management. In: Eggleston S, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (eds) IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, vol 4: agriculture, forestry and other land use. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, IGES, Japan
29. ISO (2006) ISO 14044: environmental management—life cycle assessment–requirements and guidelines. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva
30. Koellner T, de Baan L, Beck T, Brandão M, Civit B, Margni M, Canals M i, Saad R, Maia de Souza D, Müller-Wenk R (2013) UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18(6):1188–1202
31. LEAP (2014) Greenhouse gas emissions and fossil energy demand from small ruminant supply chains: guidelines for quantification. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome
32. Ledgard SF, Lieffering M, Coup D, O’Brien B (2011) Carbon footprinting of New Zealand lamb from the perspective of an exporting nation. Animal Front 1:27–32
33. Lieffering M, Ledgard S, Boyes M, Kemp R (2010) Beef greenhouse gas footprint: Final report Hamilton: AgResearch 95p
34. MfE (2010) New Zealand’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory 1990–2006: an overview. NZ Ministry of the Environment, Wellington
35. MLA (2003) Live assessment yard book: sheep and lamb. Meat & Livestock Australia Limited
36. Nguyen TTH, van der Werf HMG, Eugène M, Veysset P, Devun J, Chesneau G, Doreau M (2012) Effects of type of ration and allocation methods on the environmental impacts of beef-production systems. Livest Sci 145:239–251
37. Opio C, Gerber P, Mottet A, Falcucci A, Tempio G, MacLeod M, Vellinga T, Henderson B, Steinfeld H (2013) Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains—a global life cycle assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
38. Peters GM, Rowley HV, Wiedemann SG, Tucker RW, Short MD, Schulz MS (2010) Red meat production in Australia: life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies. Environ Sci Technol 44:1327–1332
39. Reap J, Roman F, Duncan S, Bras B (2008) A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. J Life Cycle Assess 13(5):374–388
40. Ripoll-Bosch R, de Boer IJM, Bernués A, Vellinga TV (2013) Accounting for multi-functionality of sheep farming in the carbon footprint of lamb: a comparison of three contrasting Mediterranean systems. Agric Syst 116:60–68
41. Sanson D, West T, Tatman W, Riley M, Judkins M, Moss G (1993) Relationship of body composition of mature ewes with condition score and body weight. J Anim Sci 71:1112–1116
42. Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt K, Tignor M, Miller H (2007) The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, pp 235–337
43. Steinfeld H, Gerber P, Wassenaar T, Castel V, de Haan C (2006) Livestock’s long shadow: environmental issues and options. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations, Rome
44. Thomas SM, Ledgard SF, Francis GS (2005) Improving estimates of nitrate leaching for quantifying New Zealand’s indirect nitrous oxide emissions. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 73:213–226
45. Thomassen M, Dolman M, Van Calker K, De Boer I (2009) Relating life cycle assessment indicators to gross value added for Dutch dairy farms. Ecol Econ 68:2278–2284
46. van der Werf HM, Kanyarushoki C, Corson MS (2009) An operational method for the evaluation of resource use and environmental impacts of dairy farms by life cycle assessment. J Environ Manag 90:3643–3652
47. Webby R (1993) Improving the balance of sheep and beef cattle livestock systems. In: Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association, 1993. New Zealand Grassland Association, pp 73–76
48. Weidema B (2000) Avoiding co‐product allocation in life‐cycle assessment. J Ind Ecol 4:11–33
49. Wiedemann S, McGahan E, Murphy C, Yan M-J, (2015a) Resource use and environmental impacts from beef production in eastern Australia investigated using life cycle assessment. J Anim Prod Sci. In press
50. Wiedemann SG, Yan M-J, Murphy CM, (2015b) Resource use and environmental impacts from Australian export lamb production: a life cycle assessment. J Anim Prod Sci. In press
51. Williams AG, Audsley E, Sandars DL (2006) Determining the environmental burdens and resource use in the production of agricultural and horticultural commodities vol Main Report. National Resource Management Institute, Cranfield University and Defra Bedford
52. Zehetmeier M, Gandorfer M, Heibenhuber A, de Boer IJM Modelling GHG emissions of dairy cow production systems differing in milk yield and breed—the impact of uncertainty. In: 8th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-Food Sector (LCA Food 2012), Saint Malo, France. INRA, Rennes, France, 1–4 October 2012
53. Zygoyiannis D (2006) Sheep production in the world and in Greece. Small Rumin Res 62:143–147